On 8/17/05, David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Williams wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
However there are two potential problems there:
What if the new person refused to submit the CLA?
I cannot see why - it doesn't take away any of
their
At the moment we do everything on the PMC private list
and only announce the new PMC member at the very end.
We do this ...
1) Vote and frank discussion in private.
2) If successful, then invite them.
after they accept, then do:
3) Advise them about next steps, ask for Contributor
License
David Crossley wrote:
Now all that waiting causes problems, e.g. Cyriaque's case
had successful vote, but we cannot yet announce it to the
dev list.
I didn't follow Cyriaque's case closely so I'm not sure what problem
this creates, could you explain this please.
It would be better if we
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Now all that waiting causes problems, e.g. Cyriaque's case
had successful vote, but we cannot yet announce it to the
dev list.
I didn't follow Cyriaque's case closely so I'm not sure what problem
this creates, could you explain this
David Crossley wrote:
It would be better if we could announce them to dev@ list
at step 3 and just say that there are more procedural steps
which will take some time.
+1
However there are two potential problems there:
What if the new person refused to submit the CLA?
I cannot see why - it
On 8/17/05, Ross Gardler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
It would be better if we could announce them to dev@ list
at step 3 and just say that there are more procedural steps
which will take some time.
+1
However there are two potential problems there:
What if
Tim Williams wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
However there are two potential problems there:
What if the new person refused to submit the CLA?
I cannot see why - it doesn't take away any of
their rights.
If someone does refuse then that would lead to an
