Re: missing license headers

2009-07-28 Thread David Crossley
Gavin wrote: David Crossley wrote: While doing the scan to ensure that our licensing is in order, i found some anomalies. Would the responsible committers please ensure that these files are their own work. If so then please add the ASF license header. If not then please indicate

RE: missing license headers

2009-07-22 Thread Gavin
-Original Message- From: David Crossley [mailto:cross...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, 20 July 2009 5:04 PM To: dev@forrest.apache.org Subject: missing license headers While doing the scan to ensure that our licensing is in order, i found some anomalies. Would the responsible

missing license headers

2009-07-20 Thread David Crossley
While doing the scan to ensure that our licensing is in order, i found some anomalies. Would the responsible committers please ensure that these files are their own work. If so then please add the ASF license header. If not then please indicate appropriately. Gavin:

Re: missing license headers

2009-07-20 Thread Ross Gardler
2009/7/20 David Crossley cross...@apache.org: While doing the scan to ensure that our licensing is in order, i found some anomalies. ... Ross: whiteboard/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.input.tei/resources/stylesheets/tei-to-document.xsl

Re: missing license headers

2009-07-20 Thread Thorsten Scherler
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 17:03 +1000, David Crossley wrote: While doing the scan to ensure that our licensing is in order, i found some anomalies. Would the responsible committers please ensure that these files are their own work. If so then please add the ASF license header. If not then

Re: missing license headers

2009-07-20 Thread David Crossley
Thorsten Scherler wrote: David Crossley wrote: While doing the scan to ensure that our licensing is in order, i found some anomalies. Would the responsible committers please ensure that these files are their own work. If so then please add the ASF license header. If not then

License headers

2005-07-04 Thread Ross Gardler
I noticed that the license headers in the recent Eclipse commit were incorrect. I guess Anil copied it directly from some other files, which would make me think that we have some old headers hidden away. I'm still out of the office so won't have chance to look over them until tomorrow

Re: License headers

2005-07-04 Thread David Crossley
Ross Gardler wrote: I noticed that the license headers in the recent Eclipse commit were incorrect. I guess Anil copied it directly from some other files, which would make me think that we have some old headers hidden away. I'm still out of the office so won't have chance to look over them

Re: License headers

2005-07-04 Thread Ross Gardler
David Crossley wrote: Ross Gardler wrote: I noticed that the license headers in the recent Eclipse commit were incorrect. I guess Anil copied it directly from some other files, which would make me think that we have some old headers hidden away. I'm still out of the office so won't have

Re: License headers

2005-07-04 Thread David Crossley
Ross Gardler wrote: I didn't check in detail, but I did notice the date range was 1999-2004, Oh is that all. I haven't been concerned about that at this stage. Probably new files should be 2005 and others could be tweaked. There was one file in Anil's patch that was missing the license

Re: License headers

2005-07-04 Thread Anil Ramnanan
Ross Gardler wrote: I didn't check in detail, but I did notice the date range was 1999-2004, for example: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/forrest/trunk/tools/eclipse/plugins/org.apache.forrest/src/org/apache/forrest/eclipse/job/ForrestManager.java?rev=208884view=markup Ross That