Thorsten Scherler wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 08:33 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
Tim Williams wrote:
The actual merge is going to be complex though.
Why?
I will happily merge the stuff. Actually not too much have changed.
Because it will not be a simple merge this branch with the
On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 11:52 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 08:33 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
Tim Williams wrote:
The actual merge is going to be complex though.
Why?
I will happily merge the stuff. Actually not too much have
Tim Williams wrote:
Now to the road-map I see for views and the lm-branch:
1) Fix all issues with the lm in the lm-branch (there are just minor
ones that I am aware of)
2) merge all lm related stuff with trunk (branch-trunk)
3) merge all view changes into whiteboard trunk (branch-trunk) That
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 08:33 +0100, Ross Gardler wrote:
Tim Williams wrote:
Now to the road-map I see for views and the lm-branch:
1) Fix all issues with the lm in the lm-branch (there are just minor
ones that I am aware of)
2) merge all lm related stuff with trunk (branch-trunk)
3) merge all
Now to the road-map I see for views and the lm-branch:
1) Fix all issues with the lm in the lm-branch (there are just minor
ones that I am aware of)
2) merge all lm related stuff with trunk (branch-trunk)
3) merge all view changes into whiteboard trunk (branch-trunk) That
step is and should