David Crossley wrote:
DC I think that it confuses people. Forrest can have multiple
DC source input formats, so this description conflicts with that.
I changed that back an forth a couple of times and finally took
'formats' out. Not just because the repetition sounds bad, but mostly
because to
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
DC I think that it confuses people. Forrest can have multiple
DC source input formats, so this description conflicts with that.
I changed that back an forth a couple of times and finally took
'formats' out. Not just because the repetition
David Crossley wrote:
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
DC I think that it confuses people. Forrest can have multiple
DC source input formats, so this description conflicts with that.
I changed that back an forth a couple of times and finally took
'formats' out. Not just because the
Ross Gardler wrote:
RG I'd say stick with what we had
I agree. No point in having a lengthy discussion. To a large extent it
depends on the perspective you have and the background you come from.
So if you feel happier with it, just ignore my proposal and
stick with the previous text.
--
Ross Gardler wrote:
In that case I may have liked it because of the work Ferdinand and I are
doing on the ApacheCon presentation. I'm used to his words etc.
Stick to the original if this new one is confusing.
We can enhance the original. Ferdinand, i don't mean
to dismiss any of your
David Crossley wrote:
DC We can enhance the original. Ferdinand, i don't mean
DC to dismiss any of your contribution.
OK, that's fine by me. Just go ahead and change what bugged you
about it.
On the other hand: A lot of people put their mind on improving the
previous text, so may be it was not
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 10:25 +0200, Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
DC We can enhance the original. Ferdinand, i don't mean
DC to dismiss any of your contribution.
OK, that's fine by me. Just go ahead and change what bugged you
about it.
On the other hand: A lot of people
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 11:25 +0200, Johannes Schaefer wrote:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 10:25 +0200, Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
DC We can enhance the original. Ferdinand, i don't mean
DC to dismiss any of your contribution.
OK, that's fine by me.
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 21:51 +1000, David Crossley wrote:
The Apache voting system is not used to settle competing views.
It is intended to ensure that people are happy with the
proposed course. If a vote fails then we go back to the
proposal stage and come up with something different.
You
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
Ross Gardler wrote:
RG I'd say stick with what we had
I agree. No point in having a lengthy discussion. To a large extent it
depends on the perspective you have and the background you come from.
So if you feel happier with it, just ignore my proposal and
stick
David Crossley wrote:
...
The Apache voting system is not used to settle competing views.
It is intended to ensure that people are happy with the
proposed course.
How true!
+1 :-)
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions
Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote:
Does anyone work on a plugin to generate a simple version of the site
(for Mozilla/firefox sidebar or for PDA ?)
I do not know if someone is working on it, but it would be nice at least
to do some research and put the result on a bug. This way someone could
start
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
TS Are you sure about your two commits?
No, I seem to have a problem with the Eclipse SVN plugin.
But why two? So far SVN web has only shown one (165014).
Since I don't want to touch the eclipse plugin until I know what is
going wrong and why, I'd appreciate if
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
FS I'd appreciate if you'd revert the changes I made.
OK, I found a way to revoke that commit.
So what is the second one?
--
Ferdinand Soethe
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
FS So what is the second one?
OK, now I see it. Revoked 165015 as well.
Sorry for the mess folks. I hope I've cleaned it up properly.
--
Ferdinand Soethe
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 20:18 +0200, Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
Ferdinand Soethe wrote:
FS So what is the second one?
OK, now I see it. Revoked 165015 as well.
Sorry for the mess folks. I hope I've cleaned it up properly.
No worries, no harm done. ...and yes you did. :)
Sorry I could
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 18:07 +0200, Juan Jose Pablos wrote:
Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote:
Does anyone work on a plugin to generate a simple version of the site
(for Mozilla/firefox sidebar or for PDA ?)
I do not know if someone is working on it, but it would be nice at least
to do some
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Forrest
has asked Johannes Schaefer to become a committer and a
member of the PMC and he has accepted.
Johannes has obviously been using Forrest in a demanding
environment and is uncovering a number of important bugs,
documenting them in the issue
Cyriaque Dupoirieux wrote:
http://forrest.apache.org/0.7/docs/plugins/index.html
description of org.apache.forrest.plugin.input.dtdx Plugin :
... generate automa*g*ically some ...
The original author perhaps intended it as a joke.
http://forrest.apache.org/0.7/docs/dtd-docs.html
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: David Crossley
Created: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:25 PM
Body:
Moving Ross' suggestion over from task FOR-454 ...
I would like to make a suggestion for this issue which will save us time on
future releases.
If we add an
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: David Crossley (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:28 PM
Changes:
Comment was deleted.
-
For a full history of the issue, see:
The following issue has been updated:
Updater: David Crossley (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:37 PM
Comment:
There are some notes now added, so reducing issue priority.
Changes:
priority changed from Blocker to Major
Message:
The following issue has been closed.
Resolver: David Crossley
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:39 PM
Closing this issue. The reorganisation of docs at FOR-391 is addressing these
concerns.
-
View the issue:
23 matches
Mail list logo
