Title: Apache 2.0
Hi,
Currently I am using HTTP Apache WebServer 1.3.9 with apache JServ 1.0 or 1.1 . I want to move to HTTP Apache (because multi threaded support) WebServer 2.0.43.Does Apache 2.0 support any of Apache JServ versions which is 1.0.x or 1.1.x. Or any other alternate to use
* Guntupalli, Santhi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Hi,
Currently I am using HTTP Apache WebServer 1.3.9 with apache JServ
1.0 or 1.1 . I want to move to HTTP Apache (because multi threaded
support) WebServer 2.0.43.Does Apache 2.0 support any of Apache JServ
versions which is 1.0.x or
Thom May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Guntupalli, Santhi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Hi,
Currently I am using HTTP Apache WebServer 1.3.9 with apache JServ
1.0 or 1.1 . I want to move to HTTP Apache (because multi threaded
support) WebServer 2.0.43.Does Apache 2.0 support any of Apache
Sander Striker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
First, congrats with 2.0.44 ;)
*) Introduce the EnableSendfile directive, allowing users of NFS
shares to disable sendfile mechanics when they either fail
outright or provide intermitantly corrupted data. PR
[William Rowe]
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 03:07:36PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
First, congrats with 2.0.44 ;)
*) Introduce the EnableSendfile directive, allowing users of NFS
shares to disable sendfile mechanics when they either fail
outright or provide intermitantly corrupted data. PR
Hi all,
There is a bug report PR16261 that claims that the AuthLDAPURL directive
needs quotes around it if it contains spaces.
AuthLDAPURL is defined as AP_INIT_TAKE1 - surely with such a definition
the parameter does not need quotes around it?
I just need to define the docs to be consistent
Some parties will recall that this repository is a minimalist pop3
server that stands on the apr and httpd code. Ryan was it's primary
author. Following up on some discussions in other venues... What do
people think of moving this code into the examples? As an aside, it
needs to have the
At 08:07 AM 1/21/2003, Jeroen Massar wrote:
Sander Striker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
First, congrats with 2.0.44 ;)
Glad you like it. I'm forwarding your email to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
list, since the docs are now a subproject in their own right (though some
of the same individuals
thanks!
that was the solution
--
solo turn wrote:
there is a compile error on solaris 2.8:
/bin/bash /home/src/httpd-2.0.44/srclib/apr/libtool --silent
--mode=compile cc -g -mt-DSOLARIS2=8
-D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS
-D_REENTRANT
--On Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:10 AM -0500 Ben Hyde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some parties will recall that this repository is a minimalist pop3
server that stands on the apr and httpd code. Ryan was it's
primary author. Following up on some discussions in other
venues... What do people
Hi,
have modified the 1.3 patch against mod_autoindex to provide configurable colored
indexes for 2.0;
is this of any interest?
Guenter.
#
# Apache 2.0.44 mod_autoindex patch for configurable text, link #
# and background colors
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
have modified the 1.3 patch against mod_autoindex to provide configurable colored
indexes for 2.0;
is this of any interest?
-0.
I'd prefer a patch that allows the specification of a stylesheet without
having to do SupressHTMLPreamble and
* Joshua Slive wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Günter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
have modified the 1.3 patch against mod_autoindex to provide configurable colored
indexes for 2.0;
is this of any interest?
-0.
hmm, I don't have a strong opinion about this.
mod_autoindex normally puts out HTML 3.2, so
I'm planning to apply some request dependent extensions to mod_negotiation.
The first is ready-to-commit :) but I'd like to hear some comments about
them in general.
The main goal is to make some configuration cases more simple.
The attached patch (mod_negotiation.c.patch) introduces a new
AGGGH!!! Guess I need to look into this. :(
--Cliff
-- Forwarded message --
Date: 22 Jan 2003 03:13:45 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Apache HTTPD Bugs Notification List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16313] New: -
At 10:10 PM 1/21/2003, Cliff Woolley wrote:
AGGGH!!! Guess I need to look into this. :(
Ok...you broke MMap, I broke Win9x(ME) time, and I just closed a new segv
in mod_ssl. I'm prepared to RM a release version 2.0.45 beginning on next
Tuesday, dropping as soon as we are happy
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
AGGGH!!! Guess I need to look into this. :(
Ok...you broke MMap, I broke Win9x(ME) time, and I just closed a new segv
in mod_ssl. I'm prepared to RM a release version 2.0.45 beginning on next
+1
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Cliff Woolley wrote:
#0 0x400fca8d in mmap_cleanup (themmap=0x80e6340) at mmap.c:90
#1 0x400fe986 in apr_pool_cleanup_run (p=0x80a8ef0, data=0x80e6340,
cleanup_fn=0x400fca58 mmap_cleanup) at apr_pools.c:1967
#2 0x400fccee in apr_mmap_delete (mm=0x80e6340) at mmap.c:195
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Cliff Woolley wrote:
It's unlikely that this problem has anything to do with APR; it's quite
likely just a (newly uncovered) bug in mod_file_cache.
Looks that way. mod_file_cache keeps a hash table in the cmd-pool and
puts an entry in that hash table for each of its files
Brad Nicholes wrote:
While we are on the subject of splitting auth_ldap, does it still make
sense to have mod_auth_ldap and mod_ldap? Would it make more sense to
combine these two modules. It seems that the split was initially due to
trying to include the ldap connection caching in apr-util.
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 5:31 AM
At 10:10 PM 1/21/2003, Cliff Woolley wrote:
AGGGH!!! Guess I need to look into this. :(
Ok...you broke MMap, I broke Win9x(ME) time, and I just closed a new segv
in mod_ssl.
21 matches
Mail list logo
