Hi Graham,Here is the test handler I've used :from mod_python import apachedef handler(req): req.content_type = 'text/plain' req.write(req.hlist.directory+'\n') req.write(req.filename+'\n'
) return apache.OKIf I use :DocumentRoot c:\\apache22\\htdocsDirectory c:\\apache22\\htdocs # ... SetHandler
Was this with mod_python from subversion or 3.2.8?
Want to qualify whether latest set of changes I checked in to support
Files directive has caused it to behave differently as how it determines
req.hlist.directory is different to before.
Thanks.
Graham
On 18/04/2006, at 4:33 AM, Nicolas
This was with the Subversion trunk.Ill do some tests with 3.2.8 and tell you the results.Nicolas2006/4/17, Graham Dumpleton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:Was this with mod_python from subversion or 3.2.8?
Want to qualify whether latest set of changes I checked in to supportFiles directive has caused it to
Google is about to start it's summer of code project
what does this mean for HTTP/APR ?
we need:
- mentors
and
- project ideas.
so.. if there is any niggly things or cool projects you haven't got
the time to do yourself, but could devote 2-3 hrs/week to help
someone else do, and could be
On Monday 17 April 2006 07:13, Ian Holsman wrote:
ideas so far (half joking):
- mod_ircd
- implementing a UDP protocol
- a caching module implement CML (cache-meta-language)
- a SEDA type MPM
OK, let's play ...
- Language bindings (mod_[perl|python|etc]) for new goodies
like DBD and
On 17/04/2006, at 4:27 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Monday 17 April 2006 07:13, Ian Holsman wrote:
OK, let's play ...
- Language bindings (mod_[perl|python|etc]) for new goodies
like DBD and XMLNS
This possibly ties up with something which I was intending to one day
implement
in mod_python.
On Monday 17 April 2006 07:45, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
On 17/04/2006, at 4:27 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Monday 17 April 2006 07:13, Ian Holsman wrote:
OK, let's play ...
- Language bindings (mod_[perl|python|etc]) for new goodies
like DBD and XMLNS
This possibly ties up with
On 17/04/2006, at 6:43 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Monday 17 April 2006 07:45, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
On 17/04/2006, at 4:27 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Monday 17 April 2006 07:13, Ian Holsman wrote:
OK, let's play ...
- Language bindings (mod_[perl|python|etc]) for new goodies
like DBD and XMLNS
After switching to Apache 2.2.1 (the unreleased version) we found MS
IE could no longer access our site (which has keepalive, mod_deflate,
mod_proxy, and mod_ssl). At first I thought it was a keepalive or
cipher problem, but it turned out to be a problem with IE (6.0) not
being able to
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 06:44:11PM +1000, John Vandenberg wrote:
A cool project that appears to needs a coder is mod_bittorrent.
There's already a mod_bittorrent, but it only produces .torrent files
dynamically, it doesn't act as as a seed or participate in the p2p.
There's mod_torrent too
IE is still a pretty popular browser, it's relatively important to
handle it well ;)
Shouldn't that read: IE is still a pretty popular browser, it's relatively
important that it handles things well.?
Joost
Ian Holsman wrote:
ideas so far (half joking):
- mod_ircd
- implementing a UDP protocol
- a caching module implement CML (cache-meta-language)
- a SEDA type MPM
mod_snmp would be very useful.
--
Jeff McAdams
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a
little temporary safety deserve
I've seen a mod_snmp somewhere:http://www.mod-snmp.com/mod_snmp.htmldon't know how if its free and for what version though.
On 4/17/06, Jeff McAdams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Holsman wrote: ideas so far (half joking): - mod_ircd - implementing a UDP protocol - a caching module implement CML
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:25:46PM +0200, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
I've seen a mod_snmp somewhere:
http://www.mod-snmp.com/mod_snmp.html
don't know how if its free and for what version though.
SNMP module for Apache 1.3.x as you can see on www.mod-snmp.com
vh
Mads Toftum
--
`Darn it, who
On 4/15/06, Brandon Fosdick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I might have asked this before, but I've forgotten the answer, and so has
google. Has any of the large file goodness from 2.2.x made it into 2.0.x?
Will it ever?
Different answer than you got before, but I think this is more accurate
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 07:27:08AM +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
- Update apxs to search web, download verify modules,
get security and license info.
More details from the discussions at apachecon EU last year:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200507.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
vh
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 09:09:12AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 4/15/06, Brandon Fosdick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I might have asked this before, but I've forgotten the answer, and so has
google. Has any of the large file goodness from 2.2.x made it into 2.0.x?
Will it ever?
Different
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Since there doesn't seem to be mutch interest in this i'll post what i
got in hopes of attracting some more poeple.
FWIW - there is a new project in incubation... sources have recently been
imported by the original authors (a small team of administrators at Merck
who
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
I'm not sure if I'm stepping on anyone's toes here, if I am, I don't
mean to be, I can remember a few different abandonded potential releases
at this point, I just wanna get the basic fixes out there.
Of course not :) Holiday weekend and all - if you are ready before
Brandon Fosdick wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
I haven't tried files that size, but that's far too small for
LARGE_FILE to
be relevant. I guess you knew that already, so does something else
lead you to suppose you're hitting an Apache limit?
It does seem like a rather small and arbitrary limit. I
Ian Holsman wrote:
so.. lets get brainstorming. Let's see HTTP get the prize for most
ideas (and beat those java weanies)
LOL! Ok, in all seriousness, error message localization is -sooo- long
overdue, and we have a perpetual problem with apr_status_t extention.
The next 2.0 release of
An example I'd like to do (or mentor someone) is a mod_memcached that
could serve as the basis of memcached based modules. It could handle
all the configuration details, errors, and general heavy lifting of
memcached. It would then be very easy to write other modules that had
hooks into
Quoting Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ideas so far (half joking):
- mod_ircd
- implementing a UDP protocol
- a caching module implement CML (cache-meta-language)
- a SEDA type MPM
http://www.kegel.com/c10k.html
I think a SoC project that profiles Apache (and finds out where we fall short)
so
Very interesting, lot of potention there...Might put mine on hold then... and see what comes of this.On 4/17/06, William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Jorge Schrauwen wrote: Since there doesn't seem to be mutch interest in this i'll post what i
got in hopes of attracting some more
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 12:34:29PM -0400, Rian A Hunter wrote:
I think a SoC project that profiles Apache (and finds out where we
fall short) so that we are able to compete with other lightweight HTTP
servers popping up these days would be a good endeavor for any CS
student.
Right now, I'm
On 4/16/06, Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Google is about to start it's summer of code project
what does this mean for HTTP/APR ?
we need:
- mentors
I'd be willing to help mentor.
and
- project ideas.
A few ideas:
in APR:
- Improve the build system so that it can generate
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:13:06 +1000
Ian Holsman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so.. if there is any niggly things or cool projects you haven't got
the time to do yourself,
Yeah, my no 1. wish is a mod_tal (the existing sourceforge project was
abandomed before start) that:
1. acts as an output
On 4/17/06, Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 12:34:29PM -0400, Rian A Hunter wrote:
I think a SoC project that profiles Apache (and finds out where we
fall short) so that we are able to compete with other lightweight HTTP
servers popping up these days would
On Apr 17, 2006, at 10:04 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
I suspect that a significant problem with this sort of project will be
lack of proper hardware for benchmarking purposes. From everything
I've heard it's not all that hard to totally saturate the kind of
networks you're likely to have
On 4/17/06, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 17, 2006, at 10:04 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
I suspect that a significant problem with this sort of project will be
lack of proper hardware for benchmarking purposes. From everything
I've heard it's not all that hard to
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 10:15:09AM -0700, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Perhaps, but AFAICT infra@ doesn't have this kind of thing lying
around at the moment, so unless someone is going to step up with
hardware people can use it's kind of a showstopper.
Correct.
vh
Mads Toftum
--
`Darn it, who
FWIW, in our earlier discussions we discussed segmented keys, that any
provider wouldn't have to provide multiple keys (to be hooked) but would
have to support segmented keys such that (for example) three UUID's would
designate highest - narrower - narrowest lookup, and it would (of course)
be
Rian A Hunter wrote:
This seems to be more viable for our threaded MPMs. For the prefork
MPM, maybe a
goal for 10,000 connections might be impractical.
Using worker, we do many thousands of connections (ie, much more than
10k). I think Colm has published some numbers about his experiences.
Garrett Rooney wrote:
I suspect that a significant problem with this sort of project will be
lack of proper hardware for benchmarking purposes. From everything
I've heard it's not all that hard to totally saturate the kind of
networks you're likely to have sitting around your house with
Garrett Rooney wrote:
To really benchmark it's going
to require more stuff than your average college student has lying
around the house.
Simple dual opteron with GigE networking is more than sufficient. I can
mentor by testing some changes if somebody needs it.
--
Brian Akins
Lead
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
LOL - not to mention the converse. Even when eating all four 1GB network
segments it's quite difficult to saturate anything but the NICs on one of
Sun's T2000 loaner boxes until you add dynamic content to the mix :)
Try smaller files. like 1 byte. That is how I
Alright folks, both the Netware and Win32 maintainers asked that the
directory NOT be named debugging. In vengance, for example, we would
just toss out a .libs/ directory to describe lib resources? That's
the effect here.
So - can I get everyone to agree on modules/debugging/ before we tar
I will be Out of the Office
Start Date: 13/04/2006.
End Date: 24/04/2006.
I will respond to your message when I return.
For downloads issues, please contact Steffen Mueller:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For Italy relaunch issues, contact Ross McDonald: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For all other issues, contact
On 4/17/06, Jeff McAdams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Holsman wrote: ideas so far (half joking): - mod_ircd - implementing a UDP protocol - a caching module implement CML (cache-meta-language) - a SEDA type MPMmod_snmp would be very useful.
I have implemented snmp for Apache 2.0.x
Alright folks, both the Netware and Win32 maintainers asked that the
directory NOT be named debugging. In vengance, for example, we would
just toss out a .libs/ directory to describe lib resources? That's
the effect here.
So - can I get everyone to agree on modules/debugging/ before we tar
Also all is fine with building against APR 1.2.7.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 19:39
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.1 as GA
Done.
I build against APR and APR-util 1.3.0 and the Perl scripts
Was playing with memcached and mod_cache when I had some thoughts.
-mod_cache should be renamed to mod_http_cache
-new modules mod_cache (or some inventive) name would be a more general
purpose cache)
So mod_http_cache would simply be a front end to mod_cache providers.
These providers do
- mod_cache_requestor (which i don't think really took off)
and 2 active comitters.
I still haven't given up on it. :-) I am trying to remove the libcurl
dependency by creating mocked up connection and request. hopefully, it
would take off one day :-)
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Brian Akins wrote:
Was playing with memcached and mod_cache when I had some thoughts.
-mod_cache should be renamed to mod_http_cache
-new modules mod_cache (or some inventive) name would be a more general
purpose cache)
So mod_http_cache would simply be a front end to
An example I'd like to do (or mentor someone) is a mod_memcached that
could serve as the basis of memcached based modules. It could handle
all the configuration details, errors, and general heavy lifting of
memcached. It would then be very easy to write other modules that had
hooks into
Davi Arnaut wrote:
Something similar to the Squid Storage Interface [1] ?
sorta. maybe more simple. simple fetch and store for now.
Also, do you mean to use mod_memcached as an application
cache (mod_cache working as a frontend for a site) or as
a proxy cache ?
Doesn't matter. current
Parin Shah wrote:
I have liked the idea of mod_memcached. I can work on it with you (if
we have Soc student for this project, I can work with him as well )
To clarify, I really meant to say mod_memcache, the client part, not the
server.
Was just an idea, I can help in some way as well. I
No response has been sent to the originator; feel free to
do so.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
Millennium hand and shrimp!
---BeginMessage---
Dear Apache,
This isn't a request for help (you
Hey Phil,
we're always responsive to such suggestions, but I think we've beaten
you to it, at least somewhat, see below for what may be useful
resources.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 04:16:45PM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Much Better Solution:
***
* Modify Apache so
yeah.. thats the hard part of SoC.
not coding it yourself in 20 minutes, and leaving it for your student
to do ;-)
On 18/04/2006, at 5:43 AM, Brian Akins wrote:
Parin Shah wrote:
I have liked the idea of mod_memcached. I can work on it with you (if
we have Soc student for this project, I
Hi all,
I have a protocol handler that worked perfectly in apache 2.0.53,
but after upgrading to 2.2, something strange is happening. The protocol
handler processed gnudip2 TCP update requests for yi.org dynamic DNS.
The GnuDIP2 protocol requires that a password salt be sent by
Tyler MacDonald wrote:
Hi all,
I have a protocol handler that worked perfectly in apache 2.0.53,
but after upgrading to 2.2, something strange is happening. The protocol
handler processed gnudip2 TCP update requests for yi.org dynamic DNS.
The GnuDIP2 protocol requires that a
Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add/Change your configuration to the Following:
Listen 1234 GnuDIP2
AcceptFilter GnuDIP2 none
This will disable the Accept Filter that by default waits for data.
See also the docs:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#acceptfilter
Tyler MacDonald wrote:
Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add/Change your configuration to the Following:
Listen 1234 GnuDIP2
AcceptFilter GnuDIP2 none
This will disable the Accept Filter that by default waits for data.
See also the docs:
Here's another odd one...
My apache is compiled with large file support. However, when apxs goes to
compile a DSO, it doesn't pass the correct cflags in. This results in a
bunch of syntax error before off64_t errors.
To work around this, I'm doing this:
APXS = /opt/apache2/bin/apxs
APR_CONFIG =
Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, mostly because with how the current API is structured, we don't
know what module will handle the protocol until runtime. It could be
one that wants Accept Filtering, or one that doesn't.
If you could with 100% accuracy match a single Listener
Colm:
The worker and event MPMs would use these to track their
non-worker threads; and the parent process for these MPMs could
monitor them as per option C to decide when the child process's
workers were ready to be counted.
+1, I think this could be very useful, I came accross the same
57 matches
Mail list logo
