When I encounter certain error conditions in my output filter, I would like to
return a specific error code/page (eg 503 - service not available). However,
the following code results in a 500 beeing returned to the browser:
apr_status_t my_out_filter(ap_filter_t *f, apr_bucket_brigade *bb)
{
Try this:
apr_status_t my_out_filter(ap_filter_t *f, apr_bucket_brigade *bb)
{
if (I_should_return_503)
{
ap_remove_output_filter(f);
f-r-status = HTTP_SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE;
return HTTP_OK;
}
}
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 4:25 PM, John Zhang [EMAIL
I have 100's of files stored in different directories and i load all these in
the memory in arrays and hash table. and i want to reload the memory
automatically using some handlers. When i do this in only the particular child
thread is having the updated one and the other request are showing
On 12/09/2008 01:16 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The problem with velocity's site is an interaction between mod_deflate,
mod_include, subrequests and directory indexes. In production, we are
still running 2.3.0-alpha, but I have disabled mod_deflate, which
I am a little frustrated by the changes to authorization since 2.2.
I don't understand why they were needed in the first place, nor why
we need two different but equally incomprehensible ways to configure
the same things.
I totally understand the desire to make the implementation more
modular
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:13:52PM +, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
At Joe's request I've posted the last comment here. It is in reference
to bug #43822 which is OCSP Stapling support for mod_ssl:
Thanks for posting.
...
The mutex code has been removed and some dummy functions to replace them
On 12/06/2008 05:30 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
Summarizing the vote so far it looks quite promising.
It would be cool if we would
On Dec 8, 2008, at 7:43 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The change fixed velocity.apache.org, but broke www.apache.org.
All of this sub-request + output filter stuff started in r620133
kinda
needs some more thought.
My thought is that fast_internal_subrequest (which
On 12/09/2008 02:06 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 8, 2008, at 7:43 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The change fixed velocity.apache.org, but broke www.apache.org.
All of this sub-request + output filter stuff started in r620133 kinda
needs some more thought.
My
On Dec 6, 2008, at 11:30 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
+1 on Solaris 10/sparc
SunOS sunsys 5.10 Generic_127127-11 sun4u sparc
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Summarizing the vote so far it looks quite promising.
It would be cool if we would have a Windows source bundle
to give the Windows guys a chance to test.
Are there any scripts that can be used to prepare this?
If not can Bill (sorry you are the first one that comes to
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/09/2008 02:06 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 8, 2008, at 7:43 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The change fixed velocity.apache.org, but broke www.apache.org.
All of this sub-request + output filter stuff started in r620133 kinda
needs some
On Dec 9, 2008, at 12:15 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/09/2008 02:06 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 8, 2008, at 7:43 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The change fixed velocity.apache.org, but broke www.apache.org.
All of this sub-request + output
Joe Orton wrote:
* include/ap_socache.h: Use C++ safety wrappers, and rename -delete
to -remove since the former is a C++ reserved word.
Thanks again for the socache refactoring! I've been trying to
keep these two modules up-to-date with both the socache stuff and
Apache ZooKeeper
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I totally understand the desire to make the implementation more
modular and to make a more sensible Satisfy logic, but I don't
understand the need for Match (as opposed to just extending Require)
and the odd changes in defaults (multiple Require defaults to
MatchAny
Hi --
As Paul Querna noted recently, some folks are using mod_fcgid
these days instead of mod_fastcgi, in part because it was (I believe)
the first of the two to work with httpd 2.2. Unfortunately, the
original developer of mod_fcgid, Pan Qingfeng, has largely moved on
to other things.
He
Hi --
This is all fairly simple, I think, especially if
MatchNotAny/RequireNone is removed as well so that Require retains its
apparent meaning everywhere. See if the patch below meets your
expectations; if so, I'll commit it and update the docs.
Sorry, here's a slightly updated one
+1 vanilla on 2000, XP and Vista
I have details but cannot get that mail through at the moment so I'll
break it into pieces, if that's ok.
Gregg
On 12/09/2008 07:23 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 9, 2008, at 12:15 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/09/2008 02:06 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 8, 2008, at 7:43 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The change fixed velocity.apache.org, but broke
On Dec 9, 2008, at 1:30 PM, Chris Darroch wrote:
One key question I have (jumping ahead a little) is whether
everyone who has contributed a patch to the project needs to contacted
and a signed contributor agreement recovered from them. If not,
then I
would think that we'd just need a CLA
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 9, 2008, at 1:30 PM, Chris Darroch wrote:
One key question I have (jumping ahead a little) is whether
everyone who has contributed a patch to the project needs to contacted
and a signed contributor agreement recovered from them. If not, then I
would think that
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
If the *original* code dates to Open Market's implementation, we need to
use some caution. The original license was very restrictive. The current
mod_fastcgi license is much less restrictive;
Open Market permits you to use, copy, modify, distribute, and
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 9, 2008, at 1:30 PM, Chris Darroch wrote:
One key question I have (jumping ahead a little) is whether
everyone who has contributed a patch to the project needs to contacted
and a signed contributor agreement recovered from them. If not,
On Dec 9, 2008, at 2:39 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/09/2008 07:23 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 9, 2008, at 12:15 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/09/2008 02:06 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 8, 2008, at 7:43 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Hi,
Chris Darroch wrote:
Hi --
As Paul Querna noted recently, some folks are using mod_fcgid
these days instead of mod_fastcgi, in part because it was (I believe)
the first of the two to work with httpd 2.2. Unfortunately, the
original developer of mod_fcgid, Pan Qingfeng, has largely
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The mod_fastcgi implementation has the following terms;
Open Market permits you to use, copy, modify, distribute, and license
this Software and the Documentation solely for the purpose of
implementing the FastCGI specification defined by Open Market or
Chris Darroch wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The mod_fastcgi implementation has the following terms;
Open Market permits you to use, copy, modify, distribute, and license
this Software and the Documentation solely for the purpose of
implementing the FastCGI specification defined
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 10:30:54 -0800
Chris Darroch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He and I have been in touch lately about long-term maintenance
of mod_fcgid. (We've helped by a colleague of mine who can translate
fluently between Chinese and English, although Pan Qingfeng's English
is quite good
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 21:56:43 +
Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have a complete list of people who have made nontrivial
contributions, such that their IP might be affected?
Ignore that - I meant to chop those lines when I read (as opposed
to skimmed) the following paragraphs.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. Dezember 2008 21:54
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.3.0-alpha
On Dec 9, 2008, at 2:39 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/09/2008 07:23 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
[... to the thread as a whole, not specifically to Jim's mail ...]
Let's just say, I usually run alpha-level code in a sandbox for a while
to find problems, We could use it e.g. on people.a.o or maybe httpd.a.o
if you are so keen on it. :-)
Sorry this seems to
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
+1 here, a flawless build.
-win32-src, .msi's and -symbols are all in /dev/dist waiting
to catch up with the
On 12/10/2008 08:34 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
+1 here, a flawless build.
-win32-src, .msi's and
Paul Querna wrote:
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.0-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
±1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha
Vote closes at 7:00 UTC on Tuesday December 9 2008.
Thanks,
34 matches
Mail list logo
