Hi all,
I tried this.
struct check {
int data;
} *strucSup;
shmid =
shmget(key, 32768 * sizeof(strucSup), IPC_CREAT | 0666)) 0);
This was working and the value inserted in one process was seen in other
process.
But when i tried this.
struct check {
int *data;
On 12/10/2008 02:09:19 AM, Sorin Manolache wrote:
I would propose the following approach:
Hook post_config. This one is executed once by the parent process
before any child is spawned. Therefore, any resource opened there is
inherited by all child processes. Thus, I would create _shared_
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 19:55, Ray Morris supp...@bettercgi.com wrote:
On 12/10/2008 02:09:19 AM, Sorin Manolache wrote:
I would propose the following approach:
Hook post_config. This one is executed once by the parent process
before any child is spawned. Therefore, any resource opened there
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 22:08, Sorin Manolache sor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 19:55, Ray Morris supp...@bettercgi.com wrote:
On 12/10/2008 02:09:19 AM, Sorin Manolache wrote:
I would propose the following approach:
Hook post_config. This one is executed once by the parent
On Dec 10, 2008, at 8:05 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Dec 10, 2008, at 4:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 9, 2008, at 4:56 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
It's unfortunate there's no clear copyright statement, but would it
not be reasonable to assume Copyright Pan Qingfeng and deal with
him?
typedef enum {
TOKEN_STRING,
TOKEN_RE,
TOKEN_AND,
} token_type_t;
} token_t;
} backref_t;
... all lack namespace-safety.
as do:
typedef const char *(*string_func_t)(request_rec*, const char*);
typedef int (*opt_func_t)(request_rec*, ap_parse_node_t*, string_func_t);
which are also
Hi --
I believe Pan Qingfeng (潘庆峰), the developer of mod_fcgid, has
joined this list for the time being while the possibility of mod_fcgid
becoming project in the Apache incubator is discussed. I'll use his
English name of Ryan Pan from here on.
I asked Ryan to join so that he could answer
On Dec 9, 2008, at 10:45 AM, Chris Darroch wrote:
This is all fairly simple, I think, especially if
MatchNotAny/RequireNone is removed as well so that Require retains
its
apparent meaning everywhere. See if the patch below meets your
expectations; if so, I'll commit it and update the
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I don't see a problem with RequireNone inverting the logic, and
I think it would actually be useful for blocking a set of bad
clients. Is it difficult to include that without MatchNotAny?
Not at all difficult; trivial, in fact. The only reason I took
it out as well
Hi, guys
Nice to meet you :) I hope I can help to clarify the questions.
When you wrote mod_fcgid, was there any code which you borrowed
from mod_fastcgi?
No. I didn't borrow any code from mod_fastcgi.
Your current intention is for mod_fcgid to be available under
the GPL
10 matches
Mail list logo
