Look at the httpd-test/framework package:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/test/framework/trunk/
On Dec 12, 2008, at 8:54 AM, Kevac Marko wrote:
Hello.
What is the best way to write unit tests for C apache modules? Maybe
some frameworks?
--
С уважением, Кевац Марко
Sincerely
Sam Carleton wrote:
I am trying to use apr_strtok() for the first time. I am taking the
add_cookie() function from mod_rewrite.c, no changes. I am passing in
the string, variable 's':
KioskViewingStation:KVS_VERSION::5
The first line that executes in the function is:
char *tok_cntx;
Sam Carleton wrote:
I am trying to use apr_strtok() for the first time. I am taking the
add_cookie() function from mod_rewrite.c, no changes. I am passing in
the string, variable 's':
KioskViewingStation:KVS_VERSION::5
The first line that executes in the function is:
char
2008/12/13 Saju Pillai saju.pil...@gmail.com:
On 13-Dec-08, at 1:02 PM, Mark Harrison wrote:
Sam Carleton wrote:
I am trying to use apr_strtok() for the first time. I am taking the
add_cookie() function from mod_rewrite.c, no changes. I am passing in
the string, variable 's':
pque...@apache.org wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Fri Dec 12 00:04:47 2008
New Revision: 725940
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=725940view=rev
Log:
Add a new mod_proxy_fdpass module to pass a client connection off to a separate
daemon.
So, this module right now is pretty simple.
It
Paul Querna wrote:
Here is an example python script that can act as a server for this:
http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/fdrecv.py
Run it:
$ python fdrecv.py -p /tmp/helloworld
And in your config file:
ProxyPass /test fd:///tmp/helloworld
Comments :-) ?
This is very cool :)
Docs?
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.11 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
+1, tested on Ubuntu 8 (kernel 2.6.24).
ciao...
--
Lars Eilebrecht
l...@apache.org
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 10:30:51AM -0800, Chris Darroch wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
* include/ap_socache.h: Use C++ safety wrappers, and rename -delete
to -remove since the former is a C++ reserved word.
Thanks again for the socache refactoring! I've been trying to
keep these two modules
Hai all,
Thanks a lot for your inputs and the mod_shmget source code.
I have tried the apr_shm and apr_rmm api's for shared memory and dynamic
allocating space for member elements and was working fine..
I did something like this.
My struture is.
typedef struct {char *name;
On Dec 12, 2008, at 3:54 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
pque...@apache.org wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Fri Dec 12 00:04:47 2008
New Revision: 725940
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=725940view=rev
Log:
Add a new mod_proxy_fdpass module to pass a client connection off
to a separate daemon.
Hello.
What is the best way to write unit tests for C apache modules? Maybe
some frameworks?
--
С уважением, Кевац Марко
Sincerely yours, Kevac Marko
Hi,
the struct process_score in scoreboard.h contains a sb_type member. Can
anyone please explain what that item is for? I couldn't find any usage
in the code.
The global_score does contain a similar member. That one is used.
Thanks,
Torsten
Joe Orton wrote:
Both modules look very neat! Are you going to commit them? I might
debate the naming of mod_shmap ;)
Heh, thanks. I don't know, I hadn't really thought about committing
them ... maybe the shmap one is more useful to other folks?
- have all providers consistently
my short list of things it would be nice to get done before rolling a
2.3.1-alpha:
- Confirm trunk Win32 build works
- Fixup dtrace build issues
- Solidify the configuration changes going on in auth{n,z}_core.
- rename mod_wombat to mod_luau
- more documentation :)
Anything else anyone thinks
On Dec 12, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
my short list of things it would be nice to get done before rolling
a 2.3.1-alpha:
- Confirm trunk Win32 build works
- Fixup dtrace build issues
- Solidify the configuration changes going on in auth{n,z}_core.
- rename mod_wombat to mod_luau
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:15:49AM -0800, Chris Darroch wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
Both modules look very neat! Are you going to commit them? I might
debate the naming of mod_shmap ;)
Heh, thanks. I don't know, I hadn't really thought about committing
them ... maybe the shmap one is
jor...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Fri Dec 12 12:20:40 2008
New Revision: 726109
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=726109view=rev
Log:
mod_ssl: Make the size of the per-dir-reneg request-body buffer
configurable, by popular demand:
Nice, now if we just grew apreq
Sander Temme wrote:
On Dec 12, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
my short list of things it would be nice to get done before rolling a
2.3.1-alpha:
- Confirm trunk Win32 build works
- Fixup dtrace build issues
- Solidify the configuration changes going on in auth{n,z}_core.
- rename
On 12/12/2008 09:46 AM, pque...@apache.org wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Fri Dec 12 00:46:47 2008
New Revision: 725946
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=725946view=rev
Log:
Add configuration of the Flush provider for mod_proxy_fdpass.
Modified:
Torsten Foertsch wrote:
the struct process_score in scoreboard.h contains a sb_type member. Can
anyone please explain what that item is for? I couldn't find any usage
in the code.
Looks like this was added back in r89115 along with a number of
other things which were (mostly) quickly
On 12/12/2008 09:20 PM, jor...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Fri Dec 12 12:20:40 2008
New Revision: 726109
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=726109view=rev
Log:
mod_ssl: Make the size of the per-dir-reneg request-body buffer
configurable, by popular demand:
*
Joe Orton wrote:
mod_shmap would be useful at least in modules/test so I can write some
perl-framework tests for mod_socache!
OK, I'll think about doing that. The m4/dsp/NWGNU wizardry required
makes me tired just thinking about it, though. :-) In the meantime,
I think they compile again
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:27:11 -0800
Paul Querna c...@force-elite.com wrote:
my short list of things it would be nice to get done before rolling a
2.3.1-alpha:
- Confirm trunk Win32 build works
- Fixup dtrace build issues
- Solidify the configuration changes going on in auth{n,z}_core.
-
On 12/12/2008 07:25 PM, chr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: chrisd
Date: Fri Dec 12 10:25:17 2008
New Revision: 726082
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=726082view=rev
Log:
Per suggestions by Roy T. Fielding:
- remove Match directive, allow Require to be negated
- rename Match*
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Sorry, but I currently don't get the reason for moving the negate check down
in the code.
So far as I'm aware, there's no functional or even performance
difference at the moment (not that performance really matters here,
since this function runs at configuration time).
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/12/2008 09:46 AM, pque...@apache.org wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Fri Dec 12 00:46:47 2008
New Revision: 725946
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=725946view=rev
Log:
Add configuration of the Flush provider for mod_proxy_fdpass.
Modified:
On Dec 6, 2008 11:30am, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote:
Your votes please;
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd-2.2.11 as GA
+1
built with Sun Studio Express and tested lightly on OpenSolaris 2008.11
On 12/12/2008 09:31 PM, chr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: chrisd
Date: Fri Dec 12 12:31:09 2008
New Revision: 726113
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=726113view=rev
Log:
I'm not 100% sure about this, but it seems to silence the
compiler warnings generated by r101236 (which was, in
On 12/12/2008 09:33 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:15:49AM -0800, Chris Darroch wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
One other thought ... does this change need an ap_mmn.h bump?
Ah, I was waiting for Ruediger to ask ;) Personally I think it is
I must have missed this during my
On 12/12/2008 05:31 PM, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Fri Dec 12 08:31:15 2008
New Revision: 726068
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=726068view=rev
Log:
Treat proxy/balancers normally and independently...
also, allow nice pretty
Making all in proxy
...
On 12/12/2008 11:10 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/12/2008 05:31 PM, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Fri Dec 12 08:31:15 2008
New Revision: 726068
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=726068view=rev
Log:
Treat proxy/balancers normally and independently...
also, allow nice
On 12/12/2008 11:31 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/12/2008 11:10 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/12/2008 05:31 PM, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Fri Dec 12 08:31:15 2008
New Revision: 726068
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=726068view=rev
Log:
Treat proxy/balancers
On 12/12/2008 11:10 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/12/2008 05:31 PM, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Fri Dec 12 08:31:15 2008
New Revision: 726068
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=726068view=rev
Log:
Treat proxy/balancers normally and independently...
also, allow nice
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Not quite sure if this is really correct because apr_atomic_casptr
wants to have a (volatile void**) as first parameter.
That's what made me less than sure ... but my gcc 4.1.2 -Wall
definitely doesn't like that void** (dereferencing type-punned pointer ...).
I
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:27:11 -0800
Paul Querna c...@force-elite.com wrote:
Anything else anyone thinks would be good to get in?
How about increasing worker_score::request?
This was originally proposed in Oct 2007.
Event MPM has been Experimental for a long time.
Is there any plan to mark as Productional MPM?
Or any plan to drop it like Leader, Threadpool or Perchild?
Regards,
Takashi
Takashi Sato wrote:
Event MPM has been Experimental for a long time.
Is there any plan to mark as Productional MPM?
Or any plan to drop it like Leader, Threadpool or Perchild?
Right now the push is to bring Simple up to the caliber of all
of the above, and replace 95% of people's applications.
pqf wrote:
When you wrote mod_fcgid, was there any code which you borrowed
from mod_fastcgi?
No. I didn't borrow any code from mod_fastcgi.
Your current intention is for mod_fcgid to be available under
the GPL version 2.0, correct? Could you confirm that you wanted
the GPL to
pqf wrote:
Hi, guys
Nice to meet you :) I hope I can help to clarify the questions.
Likewise :)
When you wrote mod_fcgid, was there any code which you borrowed
from mod_fastcgi?
No. I didn't borrow any code from mod_fastcgi.
That's good - we are looking at the headers you use and
Takashi Sato wrote:
Event MPM has been Experimental for a long time.
Is there any plan to mark as Productional MPM?
Or any plan to drop it like Leader, Threadpool or Perchild?
It should be moved out of experimental. It is a stable MPM, and its
experiment proved correct imo.
I was hoping to
40 matches
Mail list logo
