Re: mod_dav inconsistent behaviour for GET requests

2010-01-30 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Saturday 30 January 2010, Roy T. Fielding wrote: */ if (!conf-provider-repos-handle_get) { +if (r-finfo.filetype != APR_DIR) +r-handler = none; return DECLINED; } } It looks to me like that would introduce a

Re: [PATCH] mod_fcgid: SEGV with empty output from fcgi process

2010-01-30 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Tatsuki Sugiura s...@nemui.org wrote: Hello all, I found a problem that mod_fcgi makes segmentation fault when FastCGI process returns empty outout. It's caused with missing to check end of brigade when parsing CGI response header. I worte a patch to fix

Re: [VOTE] 1.3.42 release candidate

2010-01-30 Thread Colm MacCárthaigh
Just a reminder; Intention is to release 1.3.42 on Tuesday. If anyone has strong feelings, make them known :-) Nóirín has kindly translated the announcement into English; http://people.apache.org/~noirin/Announcement1.3.txt 2010/1/27 Colm MacCárthaigh c...@allcosts.net: 2010/1/27 Colm

Re: svn commit: r904768 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/core.xml server/core.c

2010-01-30 Thread Dan Poirier
I'm just curious, why use Define with ! rather than creating a new Undefine directive? Dan

Re: svn commit: r904768 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/core.xml server/core.c

2010-01-30 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote: I'm just curious, why use Define with ! rather than creating a new Undefine directive? same question here Of course Define !FOO has some similarities with IfDefine !FOO, but it is even more unsatisfying aesthetically IMHO.

Re: mod_dav inconsistent behaviour for GET requests

2010-01-30 Thread Graham Leggett
On 30 Jan 2010, at 12:04 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: The recommended setup is to map separate URLs for DAV and script execution to the content. It has been like this since at least 2.0. The patch intentionally breaks existing configs that rely on the ability to use the same URLs for DAV and

Re: svn commit: r904768 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/core.xml server/core.c

2010-01-30 Thread Graham Leggett
On 30 Jan 2010, at 3:55 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: I'm just curious, why use Define with ! rather than creating a new Undefine directive? same question here Of course Define !FOO has some similarities with IfDefine !FOO, but it is even more unsatisfying aesthetically IMHO. +1. Regards,

Re: svn commit: r904768 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/core.xml server/core.c

2010-01-30 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote: I'm just curious, why use Define with ! rather than creating a new Undefine directive? same question here No particular reason except the similarity to IfDefine !FOO. I will

Re: mod_dav inconsistent behaviour for GET requests

2010-01-30 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Graham Leggett wrote: On 30 Jan 2010, at 12:04 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: I don't follow how this makes it easier to use the recommended setup? In your example config, you defined /dav as being handled by mod_dav, and then you defined a FilesMatch (as I recall) that

Re: svn commit: r904768 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/core.xml server/core.c

2010-01-30 Thread Rainer Jung
On 30.01.2010 19:40, Stefan Fritsch wrote: A related question: I want to introduce a directive to set variables that are expanded during config file parsing, just like environment variables are. The problem I want to solve is that environment variables cannot be changed during graceful restart.