On 02/29/12 07:52, Rui Hu wrote:
hi,
I want to set Content-Type and Cache-Control fields in my private
module. So I hooked fixups and used apr_table_setn to set
r-headers_out but nothing happened. Was it thought through?
Thanks for you help!
Try to set r-err_headers_out.
For content-type
Thanks!
I tried to hook handler and it works well.
Rui Hu
2012/2/29 Sorin Manolache sor...@gmail.com
On 02/29/12 07:52, Rui Hu wrote:
hi,
I want to set Content-Type and Cache-Control fields in my private
module. So I hooked fixups and used apr_table_setn to set
r-headers_out but nothing
I use r-request_config to store module data as a substitute for global
vars. One type_checker_hook function uses ap_get_module_config at its
beginning. But what I got is NULL. Strangely, post_read_request_hook
function works fine, whose codes is basically the same.
Is there any caution in calling
On 2012-02-28 22:05, Ben Rockefeller wrote:
Hello,
I have a module which creates a thread using pthread_create and then
registers for SIGRTMIN+4 signal from another process. Problem is I do not
see a signal callback when the signal is sent to me. I only see it when I
try to kill apache where
On 29 Feb 2012, at 10:47, Rui Hu wrote:
I use r-request_config to store module data as a substitute for global
vars. One type_checker_hook function uses ap_get_module_config at its
beginning. But what I got is NULL. Strangely, post_read_request_hook
function works fine, whose codes is
Hi
Is there anyway to intercept HTTP 301/302 redirects ? I tried
registering a very simple output filter (AP_FTYPE_RESOURCE) and the
filter function did not get a callback. I would assume all output goes
through the filter chain
Rgds
Bhaskar
On 02/29/2012 06:01 PM, Swaminathan Bhaskar wrote:
Hi
Is there anyway to intercept HTTP 301/302 redirects ? I tried
registering a very simple output filter (AP_FTYPE_RESOURCE) and the
filter function did not get a callback. I would assume all output goes
through the filter chain
Rgds
Thanks for the quick response Joe. Just to make sure, here is what I did:
IfModule mod_myfilter.c
Location /
SetOutputFilter myfilter
/Location
/IfModule
and the code
#include stdio.h
#include httpd.h
#include http_protocol.h
#include http_config.h
#include util_filter.h
#define
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:01 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 2/28/2012 8:11 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
AP_DECLARE_DATA just affects visibility, but the switch to __stdcall
for AP_DECLARE() is an API change. (important, since AIX needs this
in 2.4.x)
If they weren't
thanks!
Problem solved. It the problem with internal redirects.
2012/2/29 Nick Kew n...@apache.org
On 29 Feb 2012, at 10:47, Rui Hu wrote:
I use r-request_config to store module data as a substitute for global
vars. One type_checker_hook function uses ap_get_module_config at its
All Windows builds for 2.2.22 and 2.4.1 Win32 are now in place at
http://www.apachelounge.com/download/
Both VC10 and for the time being also VC9 builds, Win64 64 VC10 follows.
Btw.
No serious 2.4 bug reports received till now, which you do not already know.
All runs fine.
On 29/02/2012 14:10, Steffen wrote:
No serious 2.4 bug reports received till now, which you do not
already know. All runs fine.
Cool. You refer to reports from users on your forums, I assume?
Issac
Yep and reported directly to me which are primarily companies
using/testing the builds.
On Wednesday 29/02/2012 at 14:06, Issac Goldstand wrote:
On 29/02/2012 14:10, Steffen wrote:
No serious 2.4 bug reports received till now, which you do
not already know. All
How did you make these builds, particularly those Windows 64 bits Binaries? Can
we share the directives, or can your method be integrated into the official
release?
Bing
发件人: Steffen [mailto:i...@apachelounge.com]
发送时间: 2012年2月29日 21:13
收件人: dev@httpd.apache.org
主题: Re: Windows
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Bing Swen bs...@pku.edu.cn wrote:
How did you make these builds, particularly those Windows 64 bits Binaries?
Can we share the directives, or can your method be integrated into the
official release?
The official release is the source code. Binaries are
On Wednesday 29 February 2012 04:11:35 William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I withdraw this vote, reverting my position to -1, until collaboration and
respect for options and insights of fellow committers as well as project
decisions and votes can be consistently demonstrated.
I always thought, you'd
On 2/29/2012 8:59 AM, André Malo wrote:
On Wednesday 29 February 2012 04:11:35 William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I withdraw this vote, reverting my position to -1, until collaboration and
respect for options and insights of fellow committers as well as project
decisions and votes can be consistently
Why even bother... I simply posted a comment and moved on.
On Feb 28, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Bing Swen wrote:
Some Nginx people just made a performance test with Apache 2.4.1 at
http://blog.zhuzhaoyuan.com/category/c10k/
Were the Event_MPM configuration parameters somewhere close to optimal?
On Feb 28, 2012, at 10:05 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
You have only three votes for mod_policy... please fix this today, before I
withdraw what starts to look like an ill-cast vote for introducing code with
dubious support of the community.
only three votes???
How many does he
On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:32 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
It's the reason why mod_aspdotnet was ejected, and why mod_arm4, mod_ftp and
perhaps even mod_fcgid are all on their way out of the project as it is,
unless
more committers participate in those subprojects.
The other way to
I entirely agree with you on your comment.
2012/3/1 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com:
Why even bother... I simply posted a comment and moved on.
On Feb 28, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Bing Swen wrote:
Some Nginx people just made a performance test with Apache 2.4.1 at
+1
- Original Message -
On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:32 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
It's the reason why mod_aspdotnet was ejected, and why mod_arm4,
mod_ftp and
perhaps even mod_fcgid are all on their way out of the project as
it is, unless
more committers participate in
On 2/29/2012 9:41 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 28, 2012, at 10:05 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
You have only three votes for mod_policy... please fix this today, before I
withdraw what starts to look like an ill-cast vote for introducing code with
dubious support of the community.
On 2/29/2012 9:45 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:32 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
It's the reason why mod_aspdotnet was ejected, and why mod_arm4, mod_ftp and
perhaps even mod_fcgid are all on their way out of the project as it is,
unless
more committers participate in
On 2/29/2012 8:59 AM, André Malo wrote:
On Wednesday 29 February 2012 04:11:35 William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I withdraw this vote, reverting my position to -1, until collaboration and
respect for options and insights of fellow committers as well as project
decisions and votes can be consistently
New features are a natural part of the software life-cycle, but they
bring with it a greater product surface area to document and support,
as well as more technical issues which could detract from other
developer activities. For this reason, the httpd project as a whole
has a vested interest in
Anyway, ran this live at a customer who is working with AIX5, AIX6 and AIX7.
Good news: the package I had built on AIX5, Power5 ran (Syntax test OK) on
AIX 7.1 on Power7.
Less good news: ./configure did not work using gcc (they had a very old one
installed) - embedded apr reported many errors
With the new introduction in 2.3/2.4 of the mpm run time
specification modules needing to detect which mpm is
actually running cannot rely on the old preprocessor symbols
once in mpm.h.
I confess I've been unable to find a call to the core which
returns the loaded mpm name: the module I'm
On Feb 29, 2012, at 12:19 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/29/2012 9:45 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 29, 2012, at 10:32 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
It's the reason why mod_aspdotnet was ejected, and why mod_arm4, mod_ftp and
perhaps even mod_fcgid are all on their way out of the
Wow...
As far as I can tell, we have *never* been so tight arsed with
anything else: not mod_proxy_html, mod_sed, mod_rewrite,
mod_dumpio, mod_substitute, (add your favorite one here)...
And especially not with someone who's been a PMC member for
as long as Graham has (~10yrs).
I reiterate my
On Feb 29, 2012, at 9:42 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/29/2012 8:59 AM, André Malo wrote:
On Wednesday 29 February 2012 04:11:35 William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I withdraw this vote, reverting my position to -1, until collaboration and
respect for options and insights of fellow committers
31 matches
Mail list logo
