That did it. thx!
On Aug 26, 2014, at 1:20 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Looks like its been folded into 2.4-branch...
Sorry you are
Hello everyone,
I hope I am in the right place to ask this: I am looking to join a project on
the development of an http/2 module for Apache (http://http2.github.io/).
Anyone knows of such a project going on ? I could not find anything on the
Internet. Does Apache even consider deploying
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:28 AM, hugues.desa...@orange.com wrote:
I hope I am in the right place to ask this: I am looking to join a project
on the development of an http/2 module for Apache (http://http2.github.io/).
Anyone knows of such a project going on ? I could not find anything on the
-Message d'origine-
De : Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 27 août 2014 15:34
À : Apache HTTP Server Development List
Objet : Re: http/2 Apache module
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:28 AM, hugues.desa...@orange.com wrote:
I hope I am in the right place to ask this: I
FYI - building and loading all modules in 2.4.x gives a very similar test
result. i.e., loading more modules meant getting more errors. Now that I am
finally getting to the point that I understand a bit of this I might even
start digging for causes. First I want to get PHP builds improved - now
On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 14:57 +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
Hi Simo - thanks for sending this in! I'm fine with adding this. One
question - this part looks a bit magic:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 06:24:29PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
+} else if (x != NULL) {
+const EVP_MD *md;
+
+
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:47 AM, hugues.desa...@orange.com wrote:
Thanks for your answer; I was also wondering if Apache was willing to use
already existing http/2 stack implementations, like nghttp2
(https://nghttp2.org) ?
Only speaking for myself as a committer, I think it's a reasonable
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:05:40AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
Yes the spec is strange wrt digest, which is why the code looks
strange too, here is the quote from RFC 5929 (4.1):
Great, thanks. It took me two commits due to PEBKAC issues...
On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 17:15 +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:05:40AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
Yes the spec is strange wrt digest, which is why the code looks
strange too, here is the quote from RFC 5929 (4.1):
Great, thanks. It took me two commits due to PEBKAC issues...
unsubscribe
Am 27.08.2014 um 22:26 schrieb dev:
unsubscribe
your job, no list-member can do that for you
hence the mail headers
list-help: mailto:dev-h...@httpd.apache.org
list-unsubscribe: mailto:dev-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org
List-Post: mailto:dev@httpd.apache.org
List-Id: dev.httpd.apache.org
On 27.08.2014 16:13, Eric Covener wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:47 AM, hugues.desa...@orange.com wrote:
Thanks for your answer; I was also wondering if Apache was willing to use
already existing http/2 stack implementations, like nghttp2
(https://nghttp2.org) ?
Only speaking for myself
12 matches
Mail list logo
