On 12/10/2014 08:21 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/10/2014 02:21 PM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
On 12/10/2014 01:49 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
But this way we lose the base ones that are not touched in the virtual host and
e.g. are only used by rewriterules.
So we should transfer the
On 12/11/2014 08:47 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
On 12/10/2014 08:21 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/10/2014 02:21 PM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
On 12/10/2014 01:49 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
But this way we lose the base ones that are not touched in the
virtual host and e.g. are only used
-Original Message-
From: Jan Kaluža [mailto:jkal...@redhat.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 11. Dezember 2014 14:40
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Balancers, VirtualHost and ProxyPass
On 12/11/2014 08:47 AM, Jan Kaluža wrote:
On 12/10/2014 08:21 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 10 Dec 2014, at 12:22 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
+rv = ap_get_brigade(f-next, ctx-tmp, mode, block,
ctx-remaining);
+
But if you want to keep the following apr_bucket_read() nonblocking,
you could do :
if (APR_BRIGADE_EMPTY(ctx-tmp) {
rv =
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
[]
It has always seemed wrong to me to assume what is in the brigade from an
earlier filter (ie that the bucket will be memory resident and therefore non
blocking).
Input filters' passed-in brigades usually have the
