Re: 2.6/3.0

2016-12-09 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 12/9/2016 8:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Instead, maybe we could backport all that stuff to 2.4, in a backwards > compatible fashion. That is, basically backport trunk to 2.4. This > would give us more runway to work on httpd-nextgen. > > Thoughts? Considering a lot of the changes in trunk,

Re: 2.6/3.0

2016-12-09 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > It may be weird talking about httpd 2.6/3.0 when we are stuck > in a holding pattern for 2.4.24, but actually it's not a bad > idea. > > Right now, there are quite a few improvements in trunk that > should *really* be in a

Re: PCRE 10 and puzzling edge cases

2016-12-09 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:09:42AM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > I've beaten my head against this wall for a bit longer, and came up with > > several places where pcre2 changed return types for void *what query > >

Re: PCRE 10 and puzzling edge cases

2016-12-09 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Dec 9, 2016 8:06 AM, "Petr Pisar" wrote: On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:09:42AM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > I've beaten my head against this wall for a bit longer, and came up with > several places where pcre2 changed return types for void *what query > interogations

2.6/3.0

2016-12-09 Thread Jim Jagielski
It may be weird talking about httpd 2.6/3.0 when we are stuck in a holding pattern for 2.4.24, but actually it's not a bad idea. Right now, there are quite a few improvements in trunk that should *really* be in a releasable version... Now we have some options on how to proceed, but my modus

Re: T of 2.4.24

2016-12-09 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Dec 9, 2016, at 12:20 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 12:16 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: > > @VP Legal, is this worth an escalation? You didn't see fit to respond today, > but I think this falls under the purview of

Re: PCRE 10 and puzzling edge cases

2016-12-09 Thread Petr Pisar
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:09:42AM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > I've beaten my head against this wall for a bit longer, and came up with > several places where pcre2 changed return types for void *what query > interogations (especially from int to uint32, badness on x86_64-linux). > > The

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2-2.14 RC

2016-12-09 Thread Steve Hay
On 5 December 2016 at 16:14, Issac Goldstand wrote: > Builds and passes all tests on linux x64 with: > > Perl/5.18 Apache/2.2.31 mod_perl/2.10 > Perl/5.24 Apache/2.4.23 mod_perl/2.10 > > I'm +1 on release All successful on Win32 (x64) / VC10 with: perl-5.25