On 12/9/2016 8:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Instead, maybe we could backport all that stuff to 2.4, in a backwards
> compatible fashion. That is, basically backport trunk to 2.4. This
> would give us more runway to work on httpd-nextgen.
>
> Thoughts?
Considering a lot of the changes in trunk,
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> It may be weird talking about httpd 2.6/3.0 when we are stuck
> in a holding pattern for 2.4.24, but actually it's not a bad
> idea.
>
> Right now, there are quite a few improvements in trunk that
> should *really* be in a
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:09:42AM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> > I've beaten my head against this wall for a bit longer, and came up with
> > several places where pcre2 changed return types for void *what query
> >
On Dec 9, 2016 8:06 AM, "Petr Pisar" wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:09:42AM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> I've beaten my head against this wall for a bit longer, and came up with
> several places where pcre2 changed return types for void *what query
> interogations
It may be weird talking about httpd 2.6/3.0 when we are stuck
in a holding pattern for 2.4.24, but actually it's not a bad
idea.
Right now, there are quite a few improvements in trunk that
should *really* be in a releasable version... Now we have some
options on how to proceed, but my modus
> On Dec 9, 2016, at 12:20 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 12:16 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
>
> @VP Legal, is this worth an escalation? You didn't see fit to respond today,
> but I think this falls under the purview of
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 11:09:42AM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> I've beaten my head against this wall for a bit longer, and came up with
> several places where pcre2 changed return types for void *what query
> interogations (especially from int to uint32, badness on x86_64-linux).
>
> The
On 5 December 2016 at 16:14, Issac Goldstand wrote:
> Builds and passes all tests on linux x64 with:
>
> Perl/5.18 Apache/2.2.31 mod_perl/2.10
> Perl/5.24 Apache/2.4.23 mod_perl/2.10
>
> I'm +1 on release
All successful on Win32 (x64) / VC10 with:
perl-5.25