Re: Can't find definition of ap_run_child_stopping

On 2023-08-23 07:02, Emile Cormier wrote: Hi Everyone, I'm studying parts of httpd to help me in the development of a TCP server I'm working on. In particular, I'm looking at how httpd handles socket errors. Anyway, I've stumbled upon an ap_run_child_stopping function call within the

Re: [VOTE CLOSED] Switch read/write repository from Subversion to Git

On 2023-05-11 13:45, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 5/11/23 5:40 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: On 2023-05-11 10:33, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 5/11/23 12:27 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 5/4/23 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository

Re: [VOTE CLOSED] Switch read/write repository from Subversion to Git

On 2023-05-11 10:33, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 5/11/23 12:27 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 5/4/23 10:34 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository from Subversion to Git. This means that our latest read/write repository will be no

Re: [VOTE] Switch read/write repository from Subversion to Git

On 2023-05-08 16:18, Christopher Schultz wrote: Graham, On 5/8/23 05:29, Graham Leggett via dev wrote: On 04 May 2023, at 09:34, Ruediger Pluem wrote: This is a formal vote on whether we should move our read/write repository from Subversion to Git. This means that our latest read/write

Re: [VOTE] Switch read/write repository from Subversion to Git

On 2023-05-04 07:48, Eric Covener wrote: [x]: Move the read/write repository from Subversion to Git and leverage the features of Github (for now Actions and PR). [x]: Move the read/write repository from Subversion to Git and leverage the features of Github (for now Actions and PR).

Re: ci vs PR approvals? (was: [apache/httpd] Fix a possible NULL pointer dereference in hook_uri2file (PR #355))

On 2023-05-03 14:12, Eric Covener wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:45 PM Graham Leggett via dev wrote: On 25 Apr 2023, at 07:45, Ruediger Pluem wrote: 2. Switching from Subversion to Git is mostly an emotional problem for me. We have some closer ties to Subversion by some overlaps in

Re: [httpd-site] branch main updated: publishing release httpd-2.4.55

in charge of the cve process about the proper schema here, as ours may be a bit ... off. TBD On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 12:17 PM Daniel Gruno wrote: I have patched the system to deal with the inconsistencies, but those should really be looked at. There seems to be a mix of "timeline&quo

Re: [httpd-site] branch main updated: publishing release httpd-2.4.55

I have patched the system to deal with the inconsistencies, but those should really be looked at. There seems to be a mix of "timeline" entries that are not consistent throughout the dir (even when accounting for v4.0 vs v5.0 CVE data), and those were throwing spanners into the build process.

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.53-rc2 as httpd-2.4.53

On 11/03/2022 13.14, Stefan Eissing wrote: While the 72 hours have not all passed yet, the votes so far are positive. 72 hours is a guideline, not a hard rule. If you wanna do it in 48 or 24, that's fine as long as there's a valid reason. Given that no -1 vote will come, I call for a vote

Re: Remove link to "complete list of mirrors" from download page

I've culled what is no longer relevant here. With regards, Daniel. On 22/01/2022 19.37, Daniel Sahlberg wrote: Hi, Due to ASF's migration to the new Download Content Delivery System, the "complete list of mirrors" ([1]) no longer exists om www.apache.org. Can someone with commit access

Re: Download page appears to be broken

On 31/10/2021 19.11, Craig Russell wrote: Hi, I'm looking at the download page https://httpd.apache.org/download It's https://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi - the other page is the template. I tried the link httpd-2.4.51.tar.bz2

Re: sending announcement mail

it's on announce@httpd.a.o already. I modded it through. You need to send it to annou...@apache.org as well. On 16/09/2021 06.03, ste...@eissing.org wrote: Am 16.09.2021 um 12:40 schrieb Greg Stein : Fails, how? ... email to annou...@apache.org needs to come from your @apache.org account

Re: disallow HTTP 0.9 by default?

On 22/07/2021 10.02, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 7/21/21 10:04 PM, Eric Covener wrote: I was chasing an unrelated thread about close_notify alerts and reminded me -- is it time to change the default for HttpProtocolOptions from Allow0.9 to Require1.0? As the manual says, the requirement was

Re: migration of the HTTPD project website

On 16/07/2021 22.45, Christophe JAILLET wrote: Hi, when a PULL request is generated, it is forwarded to @dev. Same when it is accepted. This is just fine for me. However, when one directly modify within apache/httpd-site on GitHub, apparently, no notification is sent. I think that is would

Re: migration of the HTTPD project website

On 07/07/2021 14.14, Eric Covener wrote: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65439 whoops, looks like the manual links from for the following are not working: https://httpd.apache.org/mod_ftp/ https://httpd.apache.org/mod_cgid/ Daniel, do you recall how this worked before? Maybe we

Re: Security features of Github

On 25/06/2021 09.23, Ruediger Pluem wrote: I would like to leverage the "security features" of GitHub like Dependabot alerts and Code scanning alerts. First question: Do we want this? Does anyone object? Second question: Is this possible with our GitHub setup? I known that this question

Re: migration of the HTTPD project website

On 18/06/2021 14.33, Eric Covener wrote: On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 8:20 AM Daniel Gruno wrote: On 18/06/2021 14.16, Eric Covener wrote: I reviewed Christophes old post, I think we should proceed with the ASF template and migration process. Worst case Christophe can still apply what he has

Re: migration of the HTTPD project website

On 18/06/2021 14.16, Eric Covener wrote: I reviewed Christophes old post, I think we should proceed with the ASF template and migration process. Worst case Christophe can still apply what he has learned to further refine the output of the migration. I'll create an infra ticket to ask for the

Re: libcurl dependency version fix for mod_md

On 15/10/2020 15.50, Stefan Eissing wrote: Am 15.10.2020 um 15:28 schrieb Alexander Gerasimov : Dear httpd devs, Please apply a small patch that fixes a minimal curl version (so mod_md can be built on CentOS 7). I made a pull request https://github.com/apache/httpd/pull/108/ and filed a

Re: Your project's website

On 05/08/2020 14.17, Andrew Wetmore wrote: Hi: I am part of the Infrastructure team, and am writing to ask whether your project is still using the Apache CMS for your project website. As you know, the CMS is reaching end-of-life, and we need projects to move their websites onto a different

Re: Can github activity (new PRs, comments) be forwarded to dev@ ?

On 29/04/2020 10.52, Daniel Gruno wrote: On 29/04/2020 10.22, Daniel Gruno wrote: I recommend using selfserve.apache.org <http://selfserve.apache.org> to create notifications@httpd (the typical name/pattern for this stuff), then to use .asf.yaml to sort out the various emails. O

Re: Can github activity (new PRs, comments) be forwarded to dev@ ?

On 29/04/2020 10.22, Daniel Gruno wrote: I recommend using selfserve.apache.org <http://selfserve.apache.org> to create notifications@httpd (the typical name/pattern for this stuff), then to use .asf.yaml to sort out the various emails. Once we are in agreement on a name here, I c

Re: Can github activity (new PRs, comments) be forwarded to dev@ ?

On 29/04/2020 10.11, Greg Stein wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 8:19 AM Joe Orton > wrote: On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 05:19:09PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > +1 g...@httpd.apache.org (I declare the naming discussion for the

Countdown to 25 years - has httpd changed your life?

Hi wonderful apache people! As we count down to the 25th anniversary of the Apache Group, founded February 27th 1995 (first release of the apache webserver was in April 1995), I'd like to put some extra effort into the quarterly board report I, as chair of the project, have to present to the

Ignore the GitHub email...

That was me trying to get travis notifications working...

Re: Travis CI failures

On 08/12/2019 20.12, Luca Toscano wrote: Il giorno dom 1 dic 2019 alle ore 12:05 Luca Toscano ha scritto: Travis seems not able to deliver emails to dev@, I opened a jira to Infra: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19508 It was suggested to ask a moderator of httpd-dev@ to approve

Re: modify bugzilla resolved statuses?

On 12/11/2019 13.57, Eric Covener wrote: On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 7:47 AM Daniel Gruno wrote: On 12/11/2019 13.29, Eric Covener wrote: Is there a way to add new sub-statuses under Resolved in our bugzilla? It would be nice to have something kind of neutral for things that are essentially

Re: modify bugzilla resolved statuses?

On 12/11/2019 13.29, Eric Covener wrote: Is there a way to add new sub-statuses under Resolved in our bugzilla? It would be nice to have something kind of neutral for things that are essentially answered questions rather than "invalid" or "worksforsome". I think "invalid" is kind of impolite

Re: Migrate to git?

On 14/10/2019 09.51, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 03:27:31PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote: At the moment I think we have a quality control problem for 2.4.x, yet I find it hard to justify spending much time on writing test cases because that stuff is run so rarely. How many tests

Re: Migrate to git?

On 07/10/2019 14.48, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 10/06/2019 06:51 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Oct 5, 2019, at 1:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Various PMCs have made their default/de-facto SCM git and have seen an increase in contributions and contributors... Is this something the httpd

Re: Migrate to git?

On 06/10/2019 17.59, Nick Kew wrote: On 6 Oct 2019, at 04:06, Daniel Gruno wrote: On 05/10/2019 19.30, Nick Kew wrote: If it moves to github, how and at what level is history preserved? Github can do alarming things with history even for a project that's always been there! We would have

Re: Migrate to git?

On 05/10/2019 19.30, Nick Kew wrote: On 5 Oct 2019, at 21:09, Jim Jagielski wrote: Various PMCs have made their default/de-facto SCM git and have seen an increase in contributions and contributors... Is this something the httpd project should consider? Especially w/ the foundation

Re: Migrate to git?

On 05/10/2019 15.09, Jim Jagielski wrote: Various PMCs have made their default/de-facto SCM git and have seen an increase in contributions and contributors... Is this something the httpd project should consider? Especially w/ the foundation officially supporting Github, it seems like time to

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.41

+1 From me as well. A few snags with lua, but that's very platform specific and doesn't affect the vote. I should probably look into better compat with 5.3 later :) On 8/9/19 11:25 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: On 2019/08/09 13:40:38, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the

[COMPLETED] Migrating our wiki

Clarke wrote: On 5/21/19 1:00 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: On 21/05/2019 12.51, Dennis Clarke wrote: On 5/21/19 12:32 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: Hi folks, looks like we have to migrate our moin wiki to confluence in the coming weeks. Unless there are objections, I'll file a self-serve request to start

Re: Migrating our wiki

On 21/05/2019 12.51, Dennis Clarke wrote: On 5/21/19 12:32 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: Hi folks, looks like we have to migrate our moin wiki to confluence in the coming weeks. Unless there are objections, I'll file a self-serve request to start migration tomorrow, and within a day or two, we

Migrating our wiki

Hi folks, looks like we have to migrate our moin wiki to confluence in the coming weeks. Unless there are objections, I'll file a self-serve request to start migration tomorrow, and within a day or two, we should have it all moved to confluence, with LDAP permissions for us.

[NOTICE] This list is closing

Hello, apreq-dev people. As this list has been more or less weaved into dev@httpd, and as there has been virtually no traffic over the past few years, we are now closing this list. People wishing to discuss apreq and co, can do so on the d...@httpd.apache.org list as always. This list will

Re: svn commit: r32075 - /dev/httpd/ /release/httpd/

On 1/22/19 8:13 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: On 2019-01-22 11:39, Daniel Gruno wrote: On 1/22/19 6:08 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, Cristophe;     Thanks for the extra eye. Fortunately, this is expected behavior. Since the announcement goes out on some future date, the date is fixed up later

Re: svn commit: r32075 - /dev/httpd/ /release/httpd/

On 1/22/19 6:08 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, Cristophe;    Thanks for the extra eye. Fortunately, this is expected behavior. Since the announcement goes out on some future date, the date is fixed up later in the announce.sh script. Daniel, could you please make sure to add a Date: header

Re: Apache 0-day / apache-uaf / use after free bugs

On 1/22/19 8:09 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: Hi, in twitter and other social media channels they're talking about a current apache 0 day: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1087593706444730369 which wasn't handled / isn't currently fixed. Some details are here:

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.28

On 1/17/19 6:59 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Ahhh good. On Jan 17, 2019, at 12:46 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 6:44 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: Note that simply changing the commit msg logs does not solve the problem. There is, in fact, no 2.4.38 tag at all. And I'm guessing we

Re: Changing mod_lua to stable

On 12/17/18 8:23 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: Hi folks, I've been pondering on the state of mod_lua, and it seems like it's time to get rid of the 'experimental' note, which still scares off a lot of people. The API has been steady over the past few years, I believe, and the code itself seems

Changing mod_lua to stable

Hi folks, I've been pondering on the state of mod_lua, and it seems like it's time to get rid of the 'experimental' note, which still scares off a lot of people. The API has been steady over the past few years, I believe, and the code itself seems to be in a stable state, so I'm inclined to go

[NOTICE] Mandatory relocation of Apache git repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org

[IF YOUR PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE GIT REPOSITORIES ON GIT-WIP-US PLEASE DISREGARD THIS EMAIL; IT WAS MASS-MAILED TO ALL APACHE PROJECTS] Hello Apache projects, I am writing to you because you may have git repositories on the git-wip-us server, which is slated to be decommissioned in the coming

[NOTICE] Mandatory relocation of Apache git repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org

[IF YOUR PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE GIT REPOSITORIES ON GIT-WIP-US PLEASE DISREGARD THIS EMAIL; IT WAS MASS-MAILED TO ALL APACHE PROJECTS] Hello Apache projects, I am writing to you because you may have git repositories on the git-wip-us server, which is slated to be decommissioned in the coming

[NOTICE] Mandatory relocation of Apache git repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org

[IF YOUR PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE GIT REPOSITORIES ON GIT-WIP-US PLEASE DISREGARD THIS EMAIL; IT WAS MASS-MAILED TO ALL APACHE PROJECTS] Hello Apache projects, I am writing to you because you may have git repositories on the git-wip-us server, which is slated to be decommissioned in the coming

[NOTICE] Mandatory relocation of Apache git repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org

[IF YOUR PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE GIT REPOSITORIES ON GIT-WIP-US PLEASE DISREGARD THIS EMAIL; IT WAS MASS-MAILED TO ALL APACHE PROJECTS] Hello Apache projects, I am writing to you because you may have git repositories on the git-wip-us server, which is slated to be decommissioned in the coming

[NOTICE] Mandatory relocation of Apache git repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org

[IF YOUR PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE GIT REPOSITORIES ON GIT-WIP-US PLEASE DISREGARD THIS EMAIL; IT WAS MASS-MAILED TO ALL APACHE PROJECTS] Hello Apache projects, I am writing to you because you may have git repositories on the git-wip-us server, which is slated to be decommissioned in the coming

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

On 10/15/2018 04:20 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: Am 15.10.2018 um 16:11 schrieb Jim Jagielski : It's up to the RM on whether or not to release... one can't veto a release and a -1 is not a veto. Huh? I was referring to "TLS 1.3 support isn't quite yet tested enough to warrant a public

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

On 09/19/2018 10:56 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: -1, the tag is not from HEAD of 2.4.x. Specifically it seems to me it is missing: r1840757 | jim | 2018-09-12 22:38:02 +0200 (Mi, 12 Sep 2018) | 12 lines Merge r1840010 from trunk: ... Can someone confirm that the tag seems to miss changes at

Re: 2.4.x and 2.6.x ... next steps

On 09/12/2018 10:58 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: On 12 Sep 2018, at 03:15, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: On Tue, Sep 11, 2018, 17:42 Graham Leggett > wrote: On 11 Sep 2018, at 20:35, Jim Jagielski mailto:j...@jagunet.com>> wrote: > This

Re: [apache/httpd] Add Option to generate multiple error logs of different format in Apache 2.4.x (#52)

On 06/06/2018 02:21 AM, Micha Lenk wrote: Hi all, on Github the pull request #52 https://github.com/apache/httpd/pull/52 looks like it has gone wild, receiving new commits from asfgit every once in a while. The pull request itself looks unusable. Does anybody know who created it and who is

Re: Vote 2.4.32 and mod_md no valid Certificate Agreement directive

Would it be possible to just have a link that always points to the _current_ agreement, much like our docs have a /current/ directory that always fetches you the current 2.4 docs? On 03/12/2018 11:03 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > > >> Am 12.03.2018 um 10:39 schrieb Luca Toscano

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

On 03/03/2018 04:56 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; > >    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I know this is a bit nitpicky, and we don't do this in all projects, but...can we please have the tarball digest in

Re: apr "the latest available version"

On 10/26/2017 12:44 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 26.10.2017 um 12:38 schrieb Graham Leggett: >> On 26 Oct 2017, at 12:31 PM, Reindl Harald >> wrote: >> >>> i am not going to subscribe to every single devel list out there for >>> single issues and had already

Re: apr "the latest available version"

On 10/25/2017 06:23 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > it is *not* helpful when you already have deployed httpd 2.4.29 that you > by random luck face a apr-1.6.3 build on the fedora buildserver I'd suggest you post this to d...@apr.apache.org if you want them to update their dist page. With regards,

Re: Time for 2.4.28 ?

On 09/18/2017 06:24 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Seems like a good time to push for a 2.4.28 T by end-of-week. > Review STATUS! Test and Vote on backports! > > Comments? > +1!

flood 0.4 was never signed for?

Hi folks, It appears that flood 0.4 ( https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/httpd/flood/ ) was never signed by anyone, which should likely be fixed. As this was, AIUI, released 8 years ago, I cannot in good conscience sign for it myself. Either we have someone who was present back then sign

Re: ACNA Miami: Who? When?

On 05/08/2017 08:00 PM, Jim Riggs wrote: > So, who all will be in Miami? From what I've seen on Sched and messages here: > > Yes : jimjag, rich, jfc, ruggeri, me > No : rowe, covener > > There are several other ACNA regulars who have been quiet around here lately. > Anyone else coming in? I'm

Re: server-status script donated to ASF

On 03/20/2017 02:01 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Since these are docs, does that mean they can be > CTR'ed into 2.4? :) probably? :) it's just an example script, nothing that needs compiling or counts as de facto replacement yet :) > >> On Mar 20, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Danie

Re: server-status script donated to ASF

On 03/20/2017 01:56 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Cool... URL? https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/server-status/ > >> On Mar 15, 2017, at 10:23 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> FWIW, the stuff that powers https://httpd.apach

server-status script donated to ASF

FWIW, the stuff that powers https://httpd.apache.org/server-status has now been donated to the HTTPd project. With regards, Daniel.

Re: JSON for mod_status

On 01/18/2017 03:48 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 01/18/2017 03:19 PM, Luca Toscano wrote: >> >> >> 2017-01-18 10:56 GMT+01:00 Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org >> <mailto:humbed...@apache.org>>: >> >> On 01/17/2017 07:33 PM, Jim Jagielski

Re: JSON for mod_status

On 01/18/2017 03:19 PM, Luca Toscano wrote: > > > 2017-01-18 10:56 GMT+01:00 Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org > <mailto:humbed...@apache.org>>: > > On 01/17/2017 07:33 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > It all depends on what Bill decides regarding mod_b

Re: JSON for mod_status

On 01/17/2017 07:33 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > It all depends on what Bill decides regarding mod_bmx and if > it is something we intent to backport to 2.4.x > > Still not sure on how to *use* BMX, or how other modules > "hook in" (right now we have several modules hook into > mod_status so the

Re: JSON for mod_status

ed XML in a decade, so I'm +/-0 on that one. If someone wants to do it, fine, but .. :p > > On 30 November 2016 at 20:08, Luca Toscano <toscano.l...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> 2016-11-30 19:03 GMT+01:00 Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org>: >>> >&g

Re: JSON for mod_status

On 11/30/2016 06:54 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I'm thinking about adding JSON support to mod_status... > the "plain" version output really stinks and lacks parity > w/ the info we provide via HTML, and it would be nice > to produce a really easily parseable format. > > Thoughts...? > +1, a

Re: Thoughts on using HW for httpd?

Since it's only been +1s, I plan to put the widget on our site today. It's on httpd.staging.apache.org if anyone wants to preview it, yell if you disagree :-) With regards, Daniel. On 02/12/2016 09:11 PM, Luis Gil wrote: > love it! > > El vie., 12 de febrero de 2016 13:20, Dan

Thoughts on using HW for httpd?

Hi folks, as some may know, ComDev is trialling a new thing called 'Help Wanted!' at https://helpwanted.apache.org/ I've added a few example entries for httpd, and I'm wondering if this is something we would want to plug into our web site? You can see an example web site widget at

Re: Thoughts on using HW for httpd?

nn Ylavic <ylavic@gmail.com > <mailto:ylavic@gmail.com>>: > > +1! > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com > <mailto:j...@jagunet.com>> wrote: > > /me like > > > >> On Feb 12

Re: [users@httpd] Block access to "OPTIONS *"

On 02/12/2016 01:28 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Blocking OPTIONS has a long and illustrious history... > I am -0 on doing anything more related to it ;) > Isn't that why we have the optional mod_allowmethods these days anyway... With regards, Daniel.

Re: 2.4.18?

I don't care who the author is - if people keep up with toxic language like what has been used in this thread, they will be removed from the lists without any further warning. Consider this your first, last and only warning. I trust I don't have to go into details about who said what here. With

Re: Moderations for modules.apache.org

On 11/9/2015, 1:54:59 PM, Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm> wrote: > On 09 Nov 2015, at 2:41 PM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > > > You're welcome to try to clean it up ;) > > make a user account on the system and give me the UID of that user

Re: Moderations for modules.apache.org

to contribute to this. :) Does this sound like a good idea, or complete overkill? With regards, Daniel. On 11/9/2015, 1:54:59 PM, Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm> wrote: > On 09 Nov 2015, at 2:41 PM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > > > You're welco

Re: Moderations for modules.apache.org

On 11/09/2015 01:25 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 06 Nov 2015, at 6:55 PM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I'm sorry to say modules.apache.org is so bot/spam infested now, that >> it's impossible to moderate it unless I spend more than an hour every

Re: Moderations for modules.apache.org

On 11/06/2015 05:53 PM, Graham Leggett wrote: > Hi all, > > I've had a module waiting to be approved at modules.apache.org for a while, > anyone know who the moderator is? > > Regards, > Graham > -- > Hi Graham, I'm sorry to say modules.apache.org is so bot/spam infested now, that it's

Re: Thx and merit

Indeed, +1! With regards, Daniel On 10/14/2015, 2:58:48 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > The ASF is all about recognizing and rewarding merit. The whole > "Apache Way" started here, with this project, and httpd has always > been the sort of "guiding light" and example of how Apache

Re: svn commit: r10796 - /release/httpd/

On 10/13/2015 01:12 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 7:42 PM, wrote: >> Author: jim >> Date: Mon Oct 12 17:42:21 2015 >> New Revision: 10796 >> >> Log: >> Push and populate mirrors... > > Despite this commit, httpd.a.o (including /download.cgi) still refers > to

Re: GitHub (mirror) pull requests notifications

On 10/09/2015 11:12 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > Could they somehow be sent to dev@, or is there legal issues? > No, nothing legal there...just that people didn't want GH integration ;) If there's a desire to have it enabled, we can make it so.. With regards, Daniel.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.17 as GA

On 10/09/2015 07:40 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.17 can be found > at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.17 GA. > > [ ] +1: Good to go > [ ] +0: meh > [ ] -1:

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

On 10/06/2015 02:01 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org > <mailto:humbed...@apache.org>> wrote: > > On 10/05/2015 06:35 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > +1! > > There's so much new goodness we hav

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

On 10/05/2015 06:35 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > +1! > There's so much new goodness we have to share! :) > > On 10/5/2015, 5:54:04 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> I propose a T of 2.4.17 this week with a release for next. I >> will RM. >> >

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

+1! There's so much new goodness we have to share! :) On 10/5/2015, 5:54:04 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I propose a T of 2.4.17 this week with a release for next. I > will RM. > > Comments? >

Re: svn commit: r1706637 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http2/config.m4

On 10/04/2015 04:22 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > This is CTR in the 2.4.x branch, right? (i.e., can just commit it?) > Yeah, it was informally decided (last week) to CTR the http2 stuff. With regards, Daniel.

Re: Lua coroutines

Not to mention that should we opt for the Lua coroutines, this would also indirectly mean it would be possible to dynamically alter the HTTP process using custom scripts, which could be very interesting :) sort of like mod_lua on steroids ;). Other ways this could be used would be unit

Re: question about mod_lua's status

On 09/20/2015 10:00 PM, Guilherme Macedo - BlueSecure wrote: > Hi. > > Does anyone know why mod_lua is still in experimental status and if > there is any plan for it to go to extension or base? > > Thanks in advance. > > Guilherme Macedo | bluesecure.com.br The experimental status refers to

Re: mod_lua unable to delete cookie

Hi Mark, you have to give it a number different from 0, because of how the internals work. This is an "optional integer" which falls back to 0 if nothing is given, and if 0, then it's not written. Set it to the past using os.time instead: r:setcookie{ key = 'foobar', value = 'blah',

Re: Helping out with release testing

Anyone is free to test and help out, and frankly, we'd highly appreciate it if you did :). As for the voting; Anyone can vote on a release, but only committers can cast binding votes. Having said that, if anyone - even a non-committer - casts a -1, it WILL cause us to pause and think about it,

Re: Helping out with release testing

There is actually an ambiguity in our policy on that. We should fix it ;) With regards, Daniel. On 2015-07-13 14:42, Eric Covener wrote: On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote: As for the voting; Anyone can vote on a release, but only committers can cast

Re: mod_lua: Accessing multiple Set-Cookie response headers

This should really go to users@, but anyway... You might want to take a look at: http://modlua.org/api/builtin#getcookie http://modlua.org/api/builtin#setcookie With regards, Daniel. On 2015-05-18 16:53, Christian Folini wrote: Hello, Mod_lua gave me a few quick wins when I started to play

Re: svn commit: r1643179 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm: prefork/prefork.c worker/worker.c

I'm working on that right now, Yann :) With regards, Daniel. On 2014-12-05 13:40, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 8:57 AM, yla...@apache.org wrote: Author: ylavic Date: Fri Dec 5 07:57:57 2014 New Revision: 1643179 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1643179view=rev The URL

Re: svn commit: r1643179 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm: prefork/prefork.c worker/worker.c

All fixed now - took a bit of digging, but it works :) On 2014-12-05 13:43, Yann Ylavic wrote: OK, thanks Daniel. On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote: I'm working on that right now, Yann :) With regards, Daniel. On 2014-12-05 13:40, Yann Ylavic wrote

Re: Change of web site layout

On 06/17/2014 12:46 AM, Tim Bannister wrote: On 16 Jun 2014, at 22:23, Rich Bowen wrote: Apache httpd being #1 on the internet is great news, but personally I'd put that on the carousel. What sort of leading text should go in its place? I'm happy to put some work into this. Also, it's

Re: Change of web site layout

On 06/16/2014 10:38 AM, Greg Stein wrote: On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 3:00 AM, André Malo n...@perlig.de mailto:n...@perlig.de wrote: * Daniel Gruno wrote: ... I'm finding the back/forth here to be a bit more combative than maybe needed. Daniel: you asked for feedback. Andre could

Re: Change of web site layout

' suggestions. Cheers, -g On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Daniel Gruno rum...@cord.dk mailto:rum...@cord.dk wrote: Hi there, dev@ people (and docs@ cc'ed), For some time now, a lot of us from the documentation team have been pondering on making our site, well, not so

Change of web site layout

Hi there, dev@ people (and docs@ cc'ed), For some time now, a lot of us from the documentation team have been pondering on making our site, well, not so 1990s looking and unappealing. We've had some input from various people over time, and together with my own thoughts, I've come up with a new

Re: Change of web site layout

[Disclaimer: I am being terse. It is late here. Or early, as it were.] On 06/16/2014 01:44 AM, André Malo wrote: Hi, * Daniel Gruno wrote: Hi there, dev@ people (and docs@ cc'ed), For some time now, a lot of us from the documentation team have been pondering on making our site, well

Re: developper/lua.xml

On 04/10/2014 03:45 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote: Hi, manual/developper/lua.xml and co are only in trunk. Should they be copied in 2.4.x? I guess so. Best regards, CJ That file is mostly a WIP which has since (for me, personally) been replaced by modlua.org I wouldn't just backport

Re: svn commit: r1582858 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: docs/log-message-tags/next-number modules/lua/lua_apr.c modules/lua/lua_apr.h modules/lua/lua_request.c modules/lua/lua_request.h

On 03/28/2014 09:29 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: Why this check if we already use t-r-pool above :-)? +ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_WARNING, 0, t-r, +APLOGNO(02614) mod_lua: Value for '%s' in table '%s' contains newline!, + key, t-n); +

  1   2   3   >