[PATCH] suppress SUEXEC_BIN printfs when suexec disabled

2008-06-11 Thread David Jones
mod_info and apachectl -V both output SUEXEC info, even if suexec has been explicitly turned off with --disable-suexec. example of current apachectl -V after running with ./configure --disable-suexec: bin/apachectl -V ... Server compiled with -D APACHE_MPM_DIR=server/mpm/worker -D

[PATCH] Response to TRACE garbled from EBCDIC platform

2008-05-15 Thread David Jones
The response to TRACE when TraceEnable Off is not used on an EBCDIC platform is partially in ASCII and partially in EBCDIC (part readable, part garbage). routine ap_send_http_trace in modules/http_filters.c recreates the request and echoes it back when TRACE is requested. form_header_field (from

Re: PATCH: build failure from ./Makefile due to no ability to add CFLAGS to buildmark compile

2007-08-09 Thread David Jones
Yes, updated our build and can now compile and link fine, Thanks, David On 8/2/07, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 01:18:08PM -0400, David Jones wrote: zOS needs to compile with extra CFLAGS in order to link correctly. After revisions 153273/153266

PATCH: build failure from ./Makefile due to no ability to add CFLAGS to buildmark compile

2007-07-27 Thread David Jones
zOS needs to compile with extra CFLAGS in order to link correctly. After revisions 153273/153266 to ./Makefile.in there is no ability to add any flags as buildmark.c is made without them directly using compile, i.e: PROGRAM_PRELINK = $(COMPILE) $(top_srcdir)/server/buildmark.c This patch will

status of incorrect use of an enum in util_ldap.h struct PATCH?

2007-06-04 Thread David Jones
I put 2 posts out awhile ago and haven't seen anything on them, can someone commit/comment on them, or should i bugzilla? post on Feb 23: PATCH: incorrect use of an enum in util_ldap.h struct http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200702.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] post on Feb 19:

Re: PATCH: support utilities should enable crypt() , current htdbm checks broken

2007-04-09 Thread David Jones
) || defined(NETWARE))) case 'd': h-alg = ALG_CRYPT; break; On 4/4/07, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/4/07, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/23/07, David Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok here's the simple patch at the 2.0.x level

Re: PATCH: support utilities should enable crypt() , current htdbm checks broken

2007-03-23 Thread David Jones
ok here's the simple patch at the 2.0.x level that just checks platforms for htdbm.c Also appended is the semi-related patch for htpasswd.c that adds TPF to the platforms checked in 2 cases where its missed, which seems like an oversight.

Re: PATCH: support utilities should enable crypt() , current htdbm checks broken

2007-03-20 Thread David Jones
Re: Jeff's last note, yes httpd does call crypt() directly, Any other questions that need discussion / resolution? David Jones -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 3/16/07, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/16/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jeff Trawick wrote: APR

Re: util_ldap.c use of hardcoded sizelimit on ldap_search_ext_s causing error

2007-03-12 Thread David Jones
that defines APR_HAS_ZOS_LDAPSDK as well. Also include a patch for util_ldap.c that will define APR_LDAP_SIZELIMIT if the version of apr-util does not include the #define. Brad On Wed, Mar 7, 2007 at 8:36 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Patch to commit

Re: util_ldap.c use of hardcoded sizelimit on ldap_search_ext_s causing error

2007-03-07 Thread David Jones
rather than hiding the value in configure. Brad On 3/1/2007 at 7:07 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about: changes to apr_ldap.h.in: #define APR_HAS_ZOS_LDAPSDK @apu_has_ldap_zos@ #if APR_LDAP_HAS_ZOS_LDAPSDK #define APR_LDAP_SIZELIMIT

Re: util_ldap.c use of hardcoded sizelimit on ldap_search_ext_s causing error

2007-03-01 Thread David Jones
How about: changes to apr_ldap.h.in: #define APR_HAS_ZOS_LDAPSDK @apu_has_ldap_zos@ #if APR_LDAP_HAS_ZOS_LDAPSDK #define APR_LDAP_SIZELIMIT LDAP_NO_LIMIT #else #ifdef LDAP_DEFAULT_LIMIT #define APR_LDAP_SIZELIMIT LDAP_DEFAULT_LIMIT #else #define APR_LDAP_SIZELIMIT -1 /* equivalent to

Re: util_ldap.c use of hardcoded sizelimit on ldap_search_ext_s causing error

2007-02-28 Thread David Jones
APR_LDAP_DEFAULT_SIZELIMIT to -1 or 0 accordingly. On 2/23/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What LDAP client SDK does z/OS use? (Novell, OpenLDAP, Netscape, Other???) Brad On 2/22/2007 at 12:52 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Its the z/OS, has

PATCH: incorrect use of an enum in util_ldap.h struct

2007-02-23 Thread David Jones
In util_ldap.h there is a use of an enum in util_ldap.h (struct util_ldap_connection_t) with the assumption that it is of length int. Similar enum in aaa/mod_authnz_ldap.c. As the size of an enum is indeterminate this call in util_ldap.c may/may not get a valid value based on how the compiler

Re: util_ldap.c use of hardcoded sizelimit on ldap_search_ext_s causing error

2007-02-22 Thread David Jones
/07, David Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently util_ldap.c has a hard coded -1 as the search limit value (meaning infinite/no limit) on ldap_search_ext_s() calls. Some platforms cannot handle the -1, but need a 0. Linux, zoS (and others) have a LDAP_NO_LIMIT value in ldap.h. Below

Re: util_ldap.c use of hardcoded sizelimit on ldap_search_ext_s causing error

2007-02-22 Thread David Jones
Its the z/OS, has LDAP_NO_SIZELIMIT defined. Does not have nor support LDAP_DEFAULT_SIZELIMIT On 2/22/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/22/2007 at 7:12 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about something alone these lines? It assumes

Remove dead defines in util_ldap.c

2007-02-19 Thread David Jones
{ \ -- David Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]

util_ldap.c use of hardcoded sizelimit on ldap_search_ext_s causing error

2007-02-15 Thread David Jones
, -NULL, NULL, NULL, -1, res)) +NULL, NULL, NULL, LDAP_NO_LIMIT, res)) == LDAP_SERVER_DOWN) { ldc-reason = ldap_search_ext_s() for user failed with server down; -- David Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: link failure from buildmark

2007-02-07 Thread David Jones
] wrote: --- David Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: zOS needs to compile with extra CFLAGS in order to link correctly. After revisions 153273/153266 to ./Makefile.in all compile and link flags are lost as buildmark.c is made without them: concept sounds fine but... --- Makefile.in.orig Wed Jan

link failure from buildmark

2007-01-24 Thread David Jones
\ $(BUILTIN_LIBS) \ Note: Can't use $(LT_COMPILE) directly instead of $(LIBTOOL) as rules.mkuses parms '-c $ touch $@' which get in the way. -- David Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]