APR bug, sorry for opening a bug report more then once

Hi apache/apr developers, sorry for opening the same APR bug report more then once, but I got an error message from bugzilla that there are missing flags for the attached patch. Also If I tried to mark the reports as DUPLICATE, I'm getting the first time an error message with unknown methode

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.21 as GA

On 2016-06-16 19:07, Jim Jagielski wrote: > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.21 can be found > at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.21 GA. > > [ ] +1: Good to go > [ ] +0: meh > [ ] -1:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.21 as GA

On 2016-06-16 19:07, Jim Jagielski wrote: > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.21 can be found > at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.21 GA. > > [ ] +1: Good to go > [ ] +0: meh > [ ] -1:

Re: svn commit: r1732275 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ include/ap_mmn.h include/http_connection.h include/scoreboard.h modules/generators/mod_status.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_kernel.c server/con

On 2016-04-14 22:43, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:28 PM, olli hauer <oha...@gmx.de> wrote: >> >> I've done some tests with 2.4.19 there is maybe an interesting detail. >> With 2.4.19 the last request is empty for an idle worker, with 2.4.20 not

Re: svn commit: r1732275 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ include/ap_mmn.h include/http_connection.h include/scoreboard.h modules/generators/mod_status.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_kernel.c server/con

On 2016-04-14 22:14, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:05 PM, olli hauer <oha...@gmx.de> wrote: >> On 2016-04-14 21:48, Yann Ylavic wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:40 PM, olli hauer <oha...@gmx.de> wrote: >>>> I've done a quick test

Re: svn commit: r1732275 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ include/ap_mmn.h include/http_connection.h include/scoreboard.h modules/generators/mod_status.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_kernel.c server/con

On 2016-04-14 22:05, Rainer Jung wrote: > Am 14.04.2016 um 22:05 schrieb olli hauer: >> On 2016-04-14 21:48, Yann Ylavic wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:40 PM, olli hauer <oha...@gmx.de> wrote: >>>> I've done a quick test with >>>> $ ab -n 1

Re: svn commit: r1732275 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ include/ap_mmn.h include/http_connection.h include/scoreboard.h modules/generators/mod_status.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_kernel.c server/con

On 2016-04-14 21:48, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:40 PM, olli hauer <oha...@gmx.de> wrote: >> I've done a quick test with >> $ ab -n 1 -c 100 $host/$url >> >> During the test the count of idle worker are incrementing and decrementing >&

Re: svn commit: r1732275 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ include/ap_mmn.h include/http_connection.h include/scoreboard.h modules/generators/mod_status.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_kernel.c server/con

On 2016-04-14 21:47, Eric Covener wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:40 PM, olli hauer <oha...@gmx.de> wrote: >> During the test the count of idle worker are incrementing and decrementing >> but it ab has finished the requests the count of idle workers stays on the

Re: svn commit: r1732275 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ include/ap_mmn.h include/http_connection.h include/scoreboard.h modules/generators/mod_status.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_kernel.c server/con

On 2016-04-14 20:36, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 7:10 PM, olli hauer <oha...@gmx.de> wrote: >> I got this morning a request from a FreeBSD user to back-port r1739008, and >> also already the feedback that scoreboard is usable again with the patch. >&

Re: svn commit: r1732275 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ include/ap_mmn.h include/http_connection.h include/scoreboard.h modules/generators/mod_status.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_kernel.c server/con

On 2016-04-13 22:04, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:27 AM, wrote: >> Author: icing >> Date: Thu Feb 25 10:27:27 2016 >> New Revision: 1732275 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1732275=rev >> Log: >> merging pre_close_connection hook,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.20 as GA

On 2016-04-04 18:20, Jim Jagielski wrote: > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.20 can be found > at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.20 GA. > > [ ] +1: Good to go > [ ] +0: meh > [ ] -1:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.19 as GA

On 2016-03-21 18:37, Jim Jagielski wrote: > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.19 can be found > at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.19 GA. > > [ ] +1: Good to go > [ ] +0: meh > [ ] -1:

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

On 2015-10-05 23:07, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:30 PM, olli hauer <oha...@gmx.de> wrote: >> >> would you mind to look at #58126 ? >> >> It contains a simple patch for acinclude.m4 to suppress warnings about >> underquoted calls to AC_DEFU

Re: T of 2.4.17 this week

On 2015-10-05 17:54, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I propose a T of 2.4.17 this week with a release for next. I > will RM. > > Comments? > Hi Jim, would you mind to look at #58126 ? It contains a simple patch for acinclude.m4 to suppress warnings about underquoted calls to AC_DEFUN. -- Thanks,

Re: AW: [RFC] Enable OCSP Stapling by default in httpd trunk

On 2015-07-03 12:13, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Rob Stradling [mailto:rob.stradl...@comodo.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Juli 2015 12:01 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: [RFC] Enable OCSP Stapling by default in httpd trunk On 02/07/15

Re: Intent to Tag 2.5.0 for -alpha consideration

On 2015-08-26 17:21, William A Rowe Jr wrote: I'm planning to tag trunk on 11 Sept to get 2.5.0 and mod_h2 into users hands ASAP and collect feedback on that module ahead of any merges back into the stable 2.4.x branch. Concerns/Questions/Roadblocks/Showstoppers? In case there will be a

Re: NOTE: Intent to TR 2.4.15 Tomorrow (Friday, June 19)

On 2015-06-18 19:08, Jim Jagielski wrote: Subj sez it all. I don't know if it is worth to report this, but the on 2.4.12. I don't see the following warnings Test build 2.4.15 (Last Changed Rev: 1686275) --- core.lo --- core.c:5003:1: warning: unused variable 'aplog_module_index'

Re: NOTE: Intent to TR 2.4.15 Tomorrow (Friday, June 19)

On 2015-06-18 22:17, Rainer Jung wrote: Am 18.06.2015 um 21:54 schrieb Jeff Trawick: On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:03 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de mailto:oha...@gmx.de wrote: On 2015-06-18 19:08, Jim Jagielski wrote: Subj sez it all. I don't know if it is worth to report

Re: NOTE: Intent to TR 2.4.15 Tomorrow (Friday, June 19)

On 2015-06-18 21:54, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:03 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote: On 2015-06-18 19:08, Jim Jagielski wrote: Subj sez it all. I don't know if it is worth to report this, but the on 2.4.12. I don't see the following warnings Are you using clang

Re: SSLCertificateChainFile deprecation, still (was: svn commit: r1685371 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS)

On 2015-06-16 13:39, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:24 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote: As a side note, even I've read the Release Notes I was thankful to see my console was trashed with the deprecation warning ;) What I miss is a section on httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4

Re: SSLCertificateChainFile deprecation, still (was: svn commit: r1685371 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS)

On 2015-06-15 03:36, Gregg Smith wrote: On 6/14/2015 6:14 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 6/14/2015 2:56 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Gregg Smithg...@gknw.net wrote: http://people.apache.org/~gsmith/proposal/sslcertificatechainfile_compromise.diff I'm fine with this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.14 as GA

On 2015-06-14 02:46, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: I did not look at pr12355.t and

Re: 2.2 and 2.4 and 2.6/3.0

On 2015-05-27 17:34, William A Rowe Jr wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: Anyone else think it's time to EOL 2.2 and focus on 2.4 and the next gen? Nope, we'll let the internet speak for itself -

Re: Upcoming 2.2.x any chance to include the following fixes/additions

On 2015-05-25 10:44, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:08 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, is there a chance to get the following revisions merged to 2.2.x - r1551685, r1652929 (fix IPv4 mapping

Re: Upcoming 2.2.x any chance to include the following fixes/additions

On 2015-05-24 23:25, Rainer Jung wrote: Am 24.05.2015 um 23:08 schrieb olli hauer: Hi, is there a chance to get the following revisions merged to 2.2.x - r1551685, r1652929 (fix IPv4 mapping on FreeBSD) In ssl_engine_dh.c there are calls to generate dh512 and dh1012, perhaps it is also

Upcoming 2.2.x any chance to include the following fixes/additions

Hi, is there a chance to get the following revisions merged to 2.2.x - r1551685, r1652929 (fix IPv4 mapping on FreeBSD) In ssl_engine_dh.c there are calls to generate dh512 and dh1012, perhaps it is also an idea to drop dh512 and add dh2048 or higher. -system(openssl gendh $rand -out dh512.pem

Re: Looking ahead to 2.4.13 / 2.2.30

On 2015-05-05 15:03, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:52 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: Concerns / observations / thoughts? I'd like to propose those 2.4.x CHANGES (r1542327+r1569005+r1542327) for backport to 2.2.x (in reverse order): *) mod_ssl: Fix

Re: svn commit: r1626978 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: docs/log-message-tags/next-number modules/generators/mod_cgi.c

On 2015-01-17 14:44, Rainer Jung wrote: Am 17.01.2015 um 05:45 schrieb Rainer Jung: Hi Jan, Am 23.09.2014 um 13:14 schrieb jkal...@apache.org: Author: jkaluza Date: Tue Sep 23 11:14:09 2014 New Revision: 1626978 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1626978 Log: mod_cgi: log cgi script stderr to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.11 as GA

Will Robinson. And why. Vote will last the normal 72 hrs. NOTE: The *-deps are only there for convenience. Thx! Forget about or any special reasons to not include the two smal fixes? On 2015-01-09 14:46, Jim Jagielski wrote: Thx. Will do. On Jan 8, 2015, at 7:06 AM, olli hauer oha

Re: Time for 2.4.11

On 2015-01-08 12:11, Jim Jagielski wrote: Let's shoot for a TR next week. The work will keep me warm :) Perhaps you can take a look into this two bug id's: - https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53824 contains a corrected fix (use correct '[[1234]].*' instead single '[1234].*'

disable SSLv3 the same way SSLv2 was disabled in mod_ssl

Hi, is there a special reason to keep SSLv3 support on current httpd version (CVE-2014-3566 POODLE attack) ? It seems all mayor browsers have disabled SSLv3 already. Are the attached patches sufficient to remove SSLv3 support the same way it was done for SSLv2? I'm not sure about

Re: disable SSLv3 the same way SSLv2 was disabled in mod_ssl

On 2015-01-02 19:31, Tim Bannister wrote: On 2 Jan 2015, at 18:18, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, is there a special reason to keep SSLv3 support on current httpd version (CVE-2014-3566 POODLE attack) ? See the previous thread starting at http://tinyurl.com/ouyk2cd My summary

[patch] fix l MPM modules listed httpd.conf

Hi Apache team, in case apache was configured with --enable-mpms-shared=all only mpm_event is listed in httpd.conf. If an additional MPM was given as default, then this MPM is listed as default but not the others, anyway in both cases all possible modules where build and installed. Resulting

Re: Apache 2.2.28 release timing.

On 2014-08-05 15:21, Mark Blackman wrote: Hi, This might be more of user than dev question, but as the discussions about timing were here, I’ll go with here.

Re: httpd release version confusion re HTTP Server 2.4.10

On 2014-07-20 19:14, Graham Leggett wrote: On 20 Jul 2014, at 18:03, dev d...@cor0.com wrote: Has 2.4.10 been released or not ? It has been released, but we need to wait for the mirrors to update before formerly announcing the release. Regards, Graham -- Looking at the

Re: Problem of URL in bugzilla

On 2014-04-20 19:36, Christophe JAILLET wrote: Hi, When browsing https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56371, in the top most frame, we can see: ASF Bugzilla – Bug 56371 Please merge r1576233 into the next httpd-2.4.10 version, the fix is missing in httpd-2.4.9 But below,

Re: Any reason why building with OpenSSL shouldn't add its lib dir to rpath?

On 2014-04-19 10:47, Tom Browder wrote: On Apr 14, 2014, at 13:30, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote: I usually force it with ./configure LDFLAGS=-Wl,-rpath -Wl,/path/to/my/openssl. +1 to have this automagically done according to --with-ssl So that should solve the problem I have on

Re: Any reason why building with OpenSSL shouldn't add its lib dir to rpath?

On 2014-04-14 13:08, Jeff Trawick wrote: (not to say there aren't complications, like trying to keep system directories out of rpath) On FreeBSD it is possible that a user has openssl 0.9.x or 1.0.x in the base OS (/usr/lib) but installs openssl 1.x.x from the ports system (/usr/local/lib).

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.2.27 as GA?

On 2014-03-13 21:55, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: The pre-release candidate Apache httpd 2.2.27 can be found in; http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ +/-1 [ ] Release 2.2.27 (apr 1.5.0, apr-util 1.5.3) Please take note of APR minor version bump from 1.4.8 to 1.5.0. Votes

Re: Issue with apr-1.5.0 on FreeBSD 10beta3

On 2013-11-25 23:25, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:28 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote: On 2013-11-25 22:14, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote

Re: Issue with apr-1.5.0 on FreeBSD 10beta3

On 2013-11-26 22:01, Rainer Jung wrote: On 26.11.2013 15:58, olli hauer wrote: On 2013-11-25 23:25, Jeff Trawick wrote: See if this brings any happiness: Index: network_io/unix/sockets.c === --- network_io/unix/sockets.c

Re: Issue with apr-1.5.0 on FreeBSD 10beta3

On 2013-11-25 22:14, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: Let's move this to dev@httpd and omit dev@apr (after this e-mail)... On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 8:28 AM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote: On 2013-11-22 00:08, Jeff Trawick wrote