I had a brief conversation with some people on IRC tonight because my svn
import was failing. The error was:
subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/util.c:358: (apr_err=175002)
svn: RA layer request failed
svn: OPTIONS request failed on /foobar
subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/util.c:343: (apr_err=175002)
svn: The
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Monday, January 13, 2003, at 02:40 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
2) I got this even if I put /foobar/ in my request. I haven't done
enough research to determine if my shell or the svn client was
stripping
off the trailing slash, but something
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
apr_brigade_create(bb, ...);
fill_brigade_with_data(bb, ...);
ap_pass_brigade(bb, ...)
ap_clean_brigade(bb, ...);
fill_brigade_with_more_data(bb, ...);
ap_pass_brigade(bb, ...);
This is
On 20 Dec 2002, Brian Pane wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 21:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20 Dec 2002, Brian Pane wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 13:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically, if you received a brigade from a higher filter, you can only
assume that it will survive
On 20 Dec 2002, Brian Pane wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 22:03, Cliff Woolley wrote:
Can we at least agree to do one thing:
release 2.0.44 *without* Brian's change.
Okay with me.
I am vetoing this change until I get a clear description of the problem it
is solving. I have explained
On 21 Dec 2002, Brian Pane wrote:
On Sat, 2002-12-21 at 07:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm really sorry, but I am sick of hearing this isn't a solution for apps
in general. This is now the fourth time that I have asked for a clear
description of _why_. I helped to design and write
What
you've done is said The brigade may not live long enough, but you
haven't explained how that is the case.
This, too, is something that we've discussed already. Request
cleanups can happen asynchronously relative to transmission of
brigades created from the request. Having a
I am actually pretty sure that allocating brigades out of the
bucket_allocator is a VERY big mistake. In fact, I am close to asking
that change to be backed out because it is too dangerous.
When we first designed buckets and bucket brigades, we made one VERY clear
distinction. Bucket_brigades
On 20 Dec 2002, Brian Pane wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 08:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am actually pretty sure that allocating brigades out of the
bucket_allocator is a VERY big mistake. In fact, I am close to asking
that change to be backed out because it is too dangerous.
When we
and you will have a hell of a time tracking it down. I can gaurantee that
this change caused a memory leak. I know it did because Greg Stein and I
argued over leaving a comment in the code that said essentially This
would be a memory leak if the brigade were allocated out of a pool, but it
On 20 Dec 2002, Brian Pane wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 12:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for this not working when the filter and handler are in different
threads, of course it will. As long as the buckets are copied into a
brigade that was allocated out of a pool that will still be
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20 Dec 2002, Brian Pane wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 08:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am actually pretty sure that allocating brigades out of the
bucket_allocator is a VERY big mistake. In fact, I am close to asking
that change to be
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Friday, December 20, 2002, at 01:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The pools are used so that we don't
have to track resources this closely, that is, in fact, their main
benefit.
They were also added for performance reasons, but I don't know if
On 20 Dec 2002, Brian Pane wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 13:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically, if you received a brigade from a higher filter, you can only
assume that it will survive a single trip down the filter stack.
Right. And you also can't assume that the context that passed
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 08:33 PM 12/20/2002, Brian Pane wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 13:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically, if you received a brigade from a higher filter, you can only
assume that it will survive a single trip down the filter stack.
mod_include.h requires util_filter.h, but it doesn't include it. This is
fine for Apache itself, because everywhere that mod_include is used,
util_filter is already included. However, for people extending
mod_include, this means that they must include util_filter. Here is a
patch to fix it.
Consider the case where an admin configures the server to listen on
www.foo.com:8080, but he never assigns a child process to listen to that
port. If you just don't accept the connections, the user will hang
forever. If every child process, however, actively closes the sockets
that it
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
Ryan, I've CC'd you on this just to let you see the patch. If you don't
want me to involve you in this, please accept my apologies and let me
know and I won't CC you in any further patches.
I have no problem being CC'ed on patches, although for the
the child
processes close the sockets for any requests that they cannot
handle. This will also improve the chance that a request won't be passed
if you have vhosts with different ports. Consider the following:
VHost www.foo.com:80
AssignChildPerUidGid rbb rbb
/Vhost
Vhost
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I was thinking was to add an artificial limitation that you can't
share an IP:port pair across two different uid/gid's since that's the
only case you want to pass a
The recent conversations on this list have made me finally realize that I
have been here too long. I need a project that is not the Apache web
server. So, this is my good-bye. I will be unsubscribing from the Apache
web server development lists in the next day or two. I will still be
look at httpd-test.
Ryan
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, David Burry wrote:
Has anyone worked on an Apache test suite? You know, like how many things
have a make test that runs all sorts of tests... or perhaps a separate
package that runs tests... I might be interested in starting one but would
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Glenn wrote:
Glenn, thanks I had deleted Jim's message and I was re-creating it. You
made it so I didn't have to. :-)
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 05:11:29PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
This is going to sound like a grumpy old man talking, but it's sounding
more and more
On 12 Oct 2002, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- mod_negotiation.c Fri Aug 9 15:21:57 2002
+++ mod_negotiation.c.new Sat Oct 12 15:47:36 2002
@@ -2881,7 +2881,7 @@
int res;
int j;
-if (r-finfo.filetype !=
On 13 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wrowe 2002/10/12 20:25:04
Modified:server log.c
Log:
Some errors are impossible to fathom, without the user knowing certain
base numbers. This patch introduces (EAP ##): Eap message for the EAP
errors, (OS ##): Message
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In all of these cases, there was a developer or three, who created a CVS
tree either in their home directories, or in the main CVS area. They made
the major changes that they wanted to see made, and then they announced
? They shouldn't. I will
personally be doing some pwork in /home/rbb/cvs either on www.apache.org
or www.rkbloom.net in the next few weeks. Once I have a working
prototype, I will open it up to people to look at and play with. Only
then can we decide if it belongs in 2.1 or 2.0.
As for the Auth patches
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Friday, October 11, 2002 10:00 PM -0700 Brian Pane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have a strong opinion about the authn redesign,
but I do have one change in mind that would fit well in
2.1: async write support. And async read
I am so sick of this conversation. 2.0 isn't done yet. It won't be done
until it is actually stable, and it isn't currently stable.
But, you have worn me down. Create a new fscking tree, populate it and
begin working on it. I will be finishing 2.0.
And yes, this is very harshly worded. We
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 11:21 PM 10/11/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am so sick of this conversation. 2.0 isn't done yet. It won't be done
until it is actually stable, and it isn't currently stable.
Fine. That's no reason to deprecate modules mid-stream.
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Greg Stein wrote:
On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 06:18:41PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I think there is a much easier way to satisfy everybody and stay in the
2.0 tree. The problem right now, is that the MMN isn't granular
enough. All we know, is that we broke
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 11:40 AM 10/13/2002, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the message above, I don't
think you are advocating a 2.1 branch. It sounds like you believe that
we should take the time to finish 2.0 before moving on. Am I
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 03:33 PM 10/13/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 11:40 AM 10/13/2002, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the message above, I don't
think you are advocating a 2.1
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Sunday, October 13, 2002 9:36 PM -0400 Joshua Slive
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more note: I'd like to see the rename of mod_access reversed.
That just seems like a gratuitous change that hurts users and
doesn't really help
On 12 Oct 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Fri, 2002-10-11 at 18:58, David Burry wrote:
This should also be a concern for anyone who's using mod_logio to charge for
bandwidth, because customers should be concerned about some serious
overcharging going on here!
Only if you charge for
What we are learning here is simple. We need to do the counting in the
core_output_filter. If that means adding a field to the conn_rec, or
somehow getting the request_rec in the core_output_filter doesn't
matter. The count needs to be done in the core_output_filter, by tallying
the amount of
Please do not mark bugs FIXED unless the problem is actually solved. I
have noticed that bugs against experimental modules are often being closed
with the explanation that the module isn't really ready for production use
yet. That isn't a good reason to close a bug. The bug still exists, but
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Randall Stewart wrote:
Hi:
I am working on getting apache2 (2.0.43) to be able
to listen on SCTP sockets as well as TCP.
This involves a small amount of work expanding the
socket_t to have a protocol field.
It should be possible to do this without any core changes,
uOn Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote:
This might sound silly, but can one make Apache 2.0 listen to a Unix domain
socket instead of a TCP socket?
I looked through the code that has to do with sockets and it seemed as if that
was not possible at this point. But I might have missed
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Randall Stewart wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Randall Stewart wrote:
Hi:
I am working on getting apache2 (2.0.43) to be able
to listen on SCTP sockets as well as TCP.
This involves a small amount of work expanding the
socket_t to have
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 7/10/02 21:45, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 03:27 PM 10/7/2002, Sander Temme wrote:
Your HEAD probably uses the glibtool(ize) installation on your local box,
which on 10.2 by default is 1.4.2. The tarball was built using
Just a heads up. I wrote SSL Upgrade support this weekend for Apache
2.0. In my (currently) limited testing, things look pretty good. We
currently respond to all requests correctly, and I think I have the SSL
filters being inserted properly. However, there are no clients that I
know of that
Please do not close bug reports without entering some kind of information
about why it is being closed.
Ryan
On 4 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
On 1 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gstein 2002/10/01 09:24:41
Modified:server core.c
Log:
Fix bug in the default handler. POST is not allowed on regular files.
The resource must be handled by something *other* than the default
handler.
-1. This is going to
I just tried to make a minor change to the server, and test it to ensure
that it didn't break anything. Unfortunately, the test suite is currently
broken with regard to SSL.
I haven't had time to look into this yet, and probably won't until Tuesday
at the earliest.
Ryan
--
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Monday, September 30, 2002 4:43 PM -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just tried to make a minor change to the server, and test it to ensure
that it didn't break anything. Unfortunately, the test suite is currently
broken with regard to
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
In the department of scratching old itches - any strong objections to me
adding the following patch which allows one to do things like
# httpd.conf
ServerRoot ${HOME}/apache
Port ${PORT:=80}
ErrorDocument 500
Serving content over UDP does work with 2.0. It takes some work, but all
of the required features are there. However, I modified Apache a couple
of years ago to serve HTTP over UDP, it doesn't work. The only reason to
serve over UDP with Apache, is to serve a different protocol.
IF you would
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Ian Holsman wrote:
Leonardo Javier Belén wrote:
I think I have a question to ask associated to this thread: How can I
implement a global pool of objects. Let me say it better, I want a global
pool of database connection, first because I have a limited number of
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
And then try to install (on Solaris) a module as a .so:
../a2/bin/apxs -i -n mod_foo mod_foo.so
I would suggest looking at HEAD rather than 2.0.40 as I made changes
to instdso.sh to explicitly handle this case. instdso.sh will
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Ryan Morgan wrote:
Thats a good point, I didn't think about that case. Maybe the safe way is
to just add a check for APR_TIMEUP?
I would much rather check for EAGAIN than continue to add more codes that
could mean failure. Or put more succinctly, there are far more
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 07:47:14PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote:
Okay... I've checked in the change. I'd suggest tossing 2.0.41 and roll this
fix into a 2.0.42. (I'm not suggesting using HEAD for 2.0.42)
Something like:
$ cvs tag -r
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 10:05 AM 9/19/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for .42
Agreed here, no signs of trouble.
And to make it official, .41 should be classified as an alpha release.
All tarballs rolled are Alpha until otherwise released as Beta
Done
Ryan
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Jon Travis wrote:
Hep pease unscripe !!
--
___
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
550 Jean St
Oakland CA 94610
More details. YAY
First, a stack trace:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1024 (LWP 18642)]
0x403cf42f in dav_method_options (r=0x8123470) at mod_dav.c:1762
1762if ((err = (*vsn_hooks-get_option)(resource, elem,
body))
(gdb) where
On 17 Sep 2002, Brian Pane wrote:
On Mon, 2002-09-16 at 23:32, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 09:46:47AM -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
I disagree entirely. There's no need to let the API keep changing
continuously, especially not for the sake of correctness. All of
our
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I was thinking about this. What about -eliminating- the mod_authn_default
and mod_authz_default, merging them into mod_auth, and moving the
directives from mod_auth_basic and mod_auth_digest into the common
mod_auth.
Mod_auth would further
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Greg Stein wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 10:26:02AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 01:00:44PM -0400, Ryan Bloom wrote:
Does that make any sense? I'm certain you will have users misconfigure
the 'backstop' modules (_default flavors) resulting
I would also recommend a new tarball with the timestamp tweaked. Something
like so:
$ tar xzf httpd-tar.gz
$ touch .../ssl_expr_parse.c
$ tar czf httpd-tar.gz httpd-...
That's gonna affect the tarball's MD5 signature tho.
And the PGP signatures. Do I hear objections
You don't want to do this. A connection based filter is connection
oriented. By definition, it has no concept of a request. While this
might make sense for HTTP, other protocol modules will have a much harder
time with this change.
Ryan
On 18 Sep 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Justin,
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Bojan Smojver wrote:
I understand. But isn't the ap_read_request HTTP specific given it's creating
the request and all? In other words, if protocol is HTTP, we let connection
filter know about the request. If not, we don't. That to me sounds exactly the
same as your
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 01:36 AM 9/10/2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 03:00:51AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jerenkrantz2002/09/09 20:00:50
Modified:.CHANGES
support htpasswd.c
Log:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Can we settle down? A donation of code was being offered, and there was
discussion within the ASF about it, but the status of those discussions
weren't being folded back to the donator.
Before we veer off on yet another tangent, can we address the
This message is complete hand-waving. The point of htpasswd is to create
password files for mod_auth. It doesn't create password files for use
with other authentication schemes. More to the point, if anybody ever
uses this option, it will FAIL with mod_auth. That violates the principle
of
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Jim Jagielski wrote:
At 11:07 AM -0700 9/10/02, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:07:30PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure
process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly under
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Chris Taylor wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- - Original Message -
From: Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 11:22 PM
Subject: Re: Tagged the tree
If there are enough people like
+1, as soon as both APR and APR-util have a release.
Ryan
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Ian Holsman wrote:
APR now has version management.
is it time to stop just tagging the HEAD of the apr/apr-util trees
when we make a release and just use the offically released ones?
ie.. we would bundle apr
Generally, we do not create tarballs of tags, because the tags are meant
to be used by developers before the release is rolled. The problem with
tarballs, is that once they are created, they can be downloaded, and then
it is very difficult to determine which version of the tarball a user
has.
So I haven't really looked into how it works, but have you looked at
mod_cplusplus?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/modcplusplus/
Ryan
On 6 Sep 2002, Jeff Trawick wrote:
At about the same time recently that I was doing horrible,
uncommittable hacks to the build to get Apache 2.0 to support
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Dale Ghent wrote:
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Greg Stein wrote:
| On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:12:10PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
| ...
| There are a few other little bugs that I'd like to fix so that 2.0.41
| holds most folks for a month or few. I have no objection
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Someone recently brought up the fact that they couldn't add a PHP
filter to a SVN-served repository via AddOutputFilter.
I think this is due to the following issues:
1) type_checker is a run_first rather than run_all.
Any reason why this
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
Is it possible to read brigades from two filter stacks simultaneously?
Yes and no. The two filter stacks share no data at all, so it is
perfectly safe to call ap_get_brigade on both filter stacks. However, we
can't poll based on filter
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 09:45:47AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is run_first because each response can only have a single content-type,
and the only reason to use that hook is to get the content-type. This is
also a performance issue.
There are currently two possible avenues.
1) The code goes into apr-util.
2) The code goes into a sandbox project.
The APR option is faster, but there is some misgivings about whether it
belongs in apr-util. The vote was done, and it seems to be accepted, but
Greg was keeping tally, so I
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Please vote:
[X] Check in aaa rewrite to 2.0.
[ ] Check in aaa rewrite to 2.1.
Ryan
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Chris Taylor wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ ] Check in aaa rewrite to 2.0.
[X] Check in aaa rewrite to 2.1.
My view is that it's important to keep 2.0 stable to attract new
users, and breaking things all the time won't help :)
Can I ask a
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Chris Taylor wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ ] Check in aaa rewrite to 2.0.
[X] Check in aaa rewrite to 2.1.
My view is that it's important to keep 2.0 stable to attract new
users,
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Chris Taylor wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ ] Check in aaa rewrite to 2.0.
[X] Check in aaa rewrite to 2.1.
My view is
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 01:48 AM 8/30/2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Since no one had any feedback to the earlier posts about splitting
the auth modules into authn/authz, I decided to just call it authn
(old auth) and authz (what Dirk called access).
[...]
Look at all of the repositories we created that are still left
around:
apache-1.2
apache-1.3
apache-apr
apache-nspr
httpd-2.0
The apache-apr and apache-nspr repositories were fairly short-lived.
I wasn't around when they were created, so perhaps the intention
++1.
Ryan
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Ian Holsman wrote:
what we need most is a stable tree for a couple of months not spliting
out to a 2.1 tree
++1
--
___
Ryan Bloom
That is awesome! The code is REALLY crufty still, but it would be great
to get more eys on it. Fair warning, it is REALLY fragile still. Happy
hacking. :-)
Ryan
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Except for the poll.h header line, perchild compiled quite nicely on
Darwin
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
Justin and I have both given our thumbs up. The question is now where to put
the thing. A few people say APR, and few don't like that. A few say httpd,
and a few don't like that. Bleh :-)
I'm 100% comfy with the landing spot being in APR,
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:25:36PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
branches in CVS are awful (perhaps not so with SVN though).
I have only heard anecdotal evidence for this, but have actually
used cvs branches on other large and very successful
I realized earlier today that I haven't been seeing commit messages.
Is anybody getting these messages?
Ryan
--
___
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
550 Jean St
Oakland CA 94610
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 12:27:29AM -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
The remaining problem is: how can we identify the request_rec from
within core_output_filter()? Within that filter, f-r is NULL. I
have some ideas for solving this by putting some
On 21 Aug 2002, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Joe Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The apreq developers would like to see apreq-2 [*]
make its way into the apache 2 distribution. Here's why:
Did you consider adding it to apr-util? (probably a dumb idea, but I'm
interested in what other
Noah,
I already answered your question through Jim Harter at Covalent. You
cannot pass information from an input filter to the access checker,
because the input filter runs during the handler phase, and the
access_checker function runs long before that.
You will need to do your access
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Don't we -already- have some argv parsing code in either proc.c or the mod_cgi
that could be used for this purpose??? Let's make that exported, accessible
code from apr itself.
We already have it, and it is exported from APR. Look in
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Ian Holsman wrote:
Ryan Bloom wrote:
I don't believe that this should be incorporated into the core
server. The core of Apache is an HTTP server, which means that it should
only know how to listen on TCP sockets. The support is there however, for
other socket
I guess I wasn't clear. I have automation that creates a new conf/, then copies
in httpd.conf* from the production conf/ with appropriate edits. So my conf/
directory exists, but doesn't contain mime.types (or several other files which
aren't relevant on daedalus).
make install runs
On 19 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gregames2002/07/19 08:11:58
Modified:.Makefile.in
Log:
Install mime.types and magic in conf/ if they don't already exist.
This also re-enables existing logic to always install *-std.conf with
substitutions made. These
On 17 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trawick 2002/07/17 15:15:01
Modified:.STATUS
Log:
somebody please tell me I don't know how to read C code anymore
(I guess the pool for an Apache socket will grow on every read/write
operation that would block.)
+
On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
What is a dynamic page if not a PHP page?
Like I said, Apache doesn't know if a file on disk is meant for PHP or
not. The best way to fix this would be for mod_php to set the value if
the filter is added for the request.
I agree, it would
On 15 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rbb 2002/06/14 22:49:06
Modified:.CHANGES
server core.c
Log:
Make the default_handler catch all requests that aren't served by
another handler. This also gets us to return a 404 if a directory
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I noticed that when issuing a HEAD request on a CGI page (trying
unsuccessfully to reproduce the showstopper), the Content-Length is
not returned.
RFC 2616 Section 9.4:
The metainformation contained in the HTTP headers in response to a
HEAD
+if (APR_BUCKET_IS_EOS(bucket)) {
+seen_eos = 1;
+break;
+}
+
+/* Ahem, what to do? */
+if (APR_BUCKET_IS_METADATA(bucket)) {
+continue;
+
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 06:26:53PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The filter should remain regardless of whether there is a C-L, because we
use that filter to determine exactly how much data was sent through the
filter stack. That is useful
Congrat's on the baby. :-)
Ryan
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Ian Holsman wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
It's my pleasure to announce that the Apache Software Foundation's Apache
HTTP Server, version 2.0.35, has now been released for General Availability.
Gees guys..
you leave for a couple of days
On 20 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wrowe 02/03/19 20:29:55
Modified:server/mpm/winnt mpm_winnt.c
Log:
When restarting [always graceful on Win32], we don't repeat pre_mpm
(Unix doesn't, we shouldn't either.) [Ryan Bloom]
-if ((parent_pid == my_pid)
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
