On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:22 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:53 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
How soon do we want another tarball with the whole flurry of fixes
committed to mod_fcgid already?
I'd like to see another beta
Hi,
I spoke a little too soon, there is one problem.
mod_fcgid correctly uses the VirtualHost as one of the unique inputs
for each backend daemon.
(Sidenote: This virtualhost code is *only* present in the unix process
manager, which means there is a separate bug/issue in the win32
process
On 21.09.2009 09:11, Paul Querna wrote:
While, this is obviously a terrible thing for a general purpose
module, I would like to propose that we add a 'FCGIIgnoreVirtualHost'
configuration option, which would set the vhost field to a constant
value, so FCGI processes would be shared between
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.dewrote:
On 21.09.2009 09:11, Paul Querna wrote:
While, this is obviously a terrible thing for a general purpose
module, I would like to propose that we add a 'FCGIIgnoreVirtualHost'
configuration option, which would set the
On 21.09.2009 09:11, Paul Querna wrote:
(Sidenote: This virtualhost code is *only* present in the unix process
manager, which means there is a separate bug/issue in the win32
process manager code)
I compared the two spawn functions and made them more consistent in
r817237 (both now using the
On 21.09.2009 13:41, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de
mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 21.09.2009 09:11, Paul Querna wrote:
While, this is obviously a terrible thing for a general purpose
module, I would like to
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[ ] +1 to release as 2.3.1-beta
With +1's recorded from chrisd, trawick and wrowe, the package is
released as-beta (due principally to the more experimental auth issues
and terse documentation).
And this is done.
At 2pm EDT we can
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:53 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[ ] +1 to release as 2.3.1-beta
With +1's recorded from chrisd, trawick and wrowe, the package is
released as-beta (due principally to the more
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:53 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
How soon do we want another tarball with the whole flurry of fixes
committed to mod_fcgid already?
I'd like to see another beta within the week, and a GA within the
month. (This could easily drag on
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[ ] +1 to release as 2.3.1-beta
With +1's recorded from chrisd, trawick and wrowe, the package is
released as-beta (due principally to the more experimental auth issues
and terse documentation).
I've staged the release, and in response to the details from Rainer,
I
Rainer Jung wrote:
Some people seem to indicate, that the implementation of pgp is safer,
on the other hand md5sum etc. have a builtin check option (-c), so you
can run them directly against the checksum file to compares the checksum
in the checksum file with a freshly computed checksum of
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[X] +1 to release as 2.3.1-beta
Beta, not GA yet IMHO. I'll work out the schema of httpd.a.o/mod_fcgid/
following mod_ftp's pattern and call this vote completed, with all positive
responses; +1's from trawick and wrowe, plus a nod from from Rainer, Gregg,
and
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Please fetch up the newly minted mod_fcgid-2.3.1.tar.gz (or bz2)
or the win32 suitable package mod_fcgid-2.3.1-crlf.zip from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_fcgid/
review, take it for a spin, and cast your choice
[X] +1 to release as 2.3.1-beta
Gave
Chris Darroch wrote:
[X] +1 to release as 2.3.1-beta
Gave it a quick compile and test run -- no heavy testing but it
handles a pre-2.3 script fine, at least. So I'd vote we get a beta
out there and encourage others to take a look. Thanks again,
Thanks Chris, I saw your positive
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Chris Darroch wrote:
[X] +1 to release as 2.3.1-beta
Gave it a quick compile and test run -- no heavy testing but it
handles a pre-2.3 script fine, at least. So I'd vote we get a beta
out there and encourage others to take a look. Thanks again,
Thanks
Chris Darroch wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Chris Darroch wrote:
[X] +1 to release as 2.3.1-beta
Gave it a quick compile and test run -- no heavy testing but it
handles a pre-2.3 script fine, at least. So I'd vote we get a beta
out there and encourage others to take a look.
From the Windows Peanut Gallery,
[ ] +1 to release as 2.3.1-beta
[X] +1 to release as 2.3.1-GA
Builds great (good Win32 build instructions), module loads quietly,
works wonderfully with existing config and shaves an average of two
seconds off a simple and straightforward chew on this
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:48 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
mod_fcgid freinds;
Please fetch up the newly minted mod_fcgid-2.3.1.tar.gz (or bz2)
or the win32 suitable package mod_fcgid-2.3.1-crlf.zip from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_fcgid/
review, take it for
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:48 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
mod_fcgid freinds;
Please fetch up the newly minted mod_fcgid-2.3.1.tar.gz (or bz2)
or the win32 suitable package mod_fcgid-2.3.1-crlf.zip from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_fcgid/
review, take it
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:48 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
mod_fcgid freinds;
Please fetch up the newly minted mod_fcgid-2.3.1.tar.gz (or bz2)
or the win32 suitable package mod_fcgid-2.3.1-crlf.zip
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Jeff Trawicktraw...@gmail.com wrote:
- mod_fcgid: user %s access check failed, respond
%d, URI %s,
+ mod_fcgid: user %s authorization failed, respond
%d, URI %s,
+1 to these and friends, noticed the
+1
On Sep 10, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Jeff Trawicktraw...@gmail.com
wrote:
- mod_fcgid: user %s access check failed,
respond
%d, URI %s,
+ mod_fcgid: user %s authorization
failed, respond
Jeff Trawick wrote:
I've been experimenting with AAA, and am currently getting massive
bogosity -- an access checker script is called for authorization -- on
subsequent requests.
I'd like to proceed on at least a beta, if we consider the AAA side to be
strictly experimental? Thoughts?
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:47 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
I've been experimenting with AAA, and am currently getting massive
bogosity -- an access checker script is called for authorization -- on
subsequent requests.
I'd like to proceed on at
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been experimenting with AAA, and am currently getting massive bogosity
-- an access checker script is called for authorization -- on subsequent
requests.
Interestingly, I found this post from Chris some time ago
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Interestingly, I found this post from Chris some time ago that covers
the issue:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mod-fcgid-us...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00085.html
His patch:
http://people.apache.org/~chrisd/patches/mod_fcgid_auth/mod_fcgid-1auth-trunk.patch
Yes -- we
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Chris Darroch chr...@pearsoncmg.comwrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Interestingly, I found this post from Chris some time ago that covers the
issue:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mod-fcgid-us...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00085.html
His patch:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:48 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
mod_fcgid freinds;
Please fetch up the newly minted mod_fcgid-2.3.1.tar.gz (or bz2)
or the win32 suitable package mod_fcgid-2.3.1-crlf.zip from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_fcgid/
review, take it for
On 09.09.2009 01:48, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
mod_fcgid freinds;
Please fetch up the newly minted mod_fcgid-2.3.1.tar.gz (or bz2)
or the win32 suitable package mod_fcgid-2.3.1-crlf.zip from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_fcgid/
review, take it for a spin, and cast your
Rainer Jung wrote:
Signing good, hash files are in a format at least my md5sum and sha1sum
do not understand how to check.
Can anyone point out what I'm doing wrong with 'gpg --print-md md5'? Am I
missing some magic flag, or is the idea of using gpg to create hashes simply
broken?
Rainer Jung wrote:
I think it's still beta, because the docs are not enough to get one
started. Especially the description for FCGIWrapper is strange:
Well, all the docs are strange ;-) Any volunteers?
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_fcgid/trunk/docs/manual/mod/
- I wasn't able
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Signing good, hash files are in a format at least my md5sum and sha1sum
do not understand how to check.
Can anyone point out what I'm doing wrong with 'gpg --print-md md5'? Am I
missing some magic flag, or is the idea of using gpg to create
mod_fcgid freinds;
Please fetch up the newly minted mod_fcgid-2.3.1.tar.gz (or bz2)
or the win32 suitable package mod_fcgid-2.3.1-crlf.zip from:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_fcgid/
review, take it for a spin, and cast your choice
[ ] -1 for any release of 2.3.1 (regressed from
33 matches
Mail list logo
