Re: Moving httpd-2.0 to Subversion

2004-09-27 Thread Sander Striker
On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 06:13, Joe Schaefer wrote: Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Probably not worth it given all of the parallel development. Well, I'd rather see us using something like this: httpd/ apreq/ trunk/ branches/ tags/ +1, with

Re: Moving httpd-2.0 to Subversion

2004-09-27 Thread Joe Schaefer
Sander Striker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 06:13, Joe Schaefer wrote: [...] apreq/branches/1.3 and httpd-apreq-2 cvs can go to apreq/trunk. *nod* Correction: apreq/branches/1.x We've already released libapreq-1.3, and since we're still maintaining that codebase

Re: Moving httpd-2.0 to Subversion

2004-09-18 Thread Edward Rudd
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 17:20:08 -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote: +1 Subversion still lacks a few features in commit notices, and I don't see the equivalent of viewcvs diff (must be hidden somewhere), but the developer interaction is much better. the latest CVS of Horde's Chors provids a

Re: Moving httpd-2.0 to Subversion

2004-09-18 Thread Paul Querna
On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 07:57 +0200, Sander Striker wrote: What are the barriers to moving to Subversion? Other than making the actual decision? None. I believe we might as well do it now, before we start on a new stable branch (2.2). Time for another Vote? Here's my +1. I should

Re: Moving httpd-2.0 to Subversion

2004-09-17 Thread Paul Querna
On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 07:57 +0200, Sander Striker wrote: I can't believe I am not in this list... You made the proposal, but didn't say '+1', so at best, it was an implied vote. :)

Re: Moving httpd-2.0 to Subversion

2004-09-17 Thread Geoffrey Young
Paul Querna wrote: The Original Proposal was in March of this year: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10791831443r=2w=2 +1 Votes: Tom May Justin Erenkrantz Andr Malo Erik Abele Jim Jagielski Bill Stoddard Joe Orton +1 here, too. --Geoff

Re: Moving httpd-2.0 to Subversion

2004-09-17 Thread Roy T. Fielding
+1 Subversion still lacks a few features in commit notices, and I don't see the equivalent of viewcvs diff (must be hidden somewhere), but the developer interaction is much better. What are we going to use for trunk names? httpd-1.3 and httpd-2? I wonder how hard it would be to make

Moving httpd-2.0 to Subversion

2004-09-16 Thread Paul Querna
The Original Proposal was in March of this year: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10791831443r=2w=2 +1 Votes: Tom May Justin Erenkrantz Andr Malo Erik Abele Jim Jagielski Bill Stoddard Joe Orton -1 Votes: Aaron Bannert Aaron said: This will, at least for now, raise the bar

Re: Moving httpd-2.0 to Subversion

2004-09-16 Thread Sander Striker
From: Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 7:34 AM Hi, The Original Proposal was in March of this year: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10791831443r=2w=2 +1 Votes: Tom May Justin Erenkrantz Andr Malo Erik Abele Jim Jagielski Bill Stoddard