Re: svn commit: r1358167 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: acinclude.m4 modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c
On 06.07.2012 14:41, b...@apache.org wrote: Author: ben Date: Fri Jul 6 12:41:10 2012 New Revision: 1358167 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1358167view=rev Log: Work correctly with a development version of OpenSSL. I suspect something similar is needed when there are two OpenSSL installations, one in a default location. Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/acinclude.m4 httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/acinclude.m4 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/acinclude.m4?rev=1358167r1=1358166r2=1358167view=diff == --- httpd/httpd/trunk/acinclude.m4 (original) +++ httpd/httpd/trunk/acinclude.m4 Fri Jul 6 12:41:10 2012 [...] +dnl See if we've been given a development OpenSSL (lib does not exist) +if test ! -d $ap_openssl_base/lib; then + AC_MSG_WARN([Using development version of OpenSSL]) + dnl we need to prepend the directories to override the system version + CPPFLAGS=-I$ap_openssl_base/include $CPPFLAGS + INCLUDES=-I$ap_openssl_base/include $INCLUDES + LDFLAGS=-L$ap_openssl_base $LDFLAGS + dnl naughty, but easier than the alternatives + saved_LDFLAGS=$LDFLAGS + SSL_LIBS=-L$ap_openssl_base +else The --with-ssl argument to configure expects a path to (the base of) an installed version of OpenSSL. If I'm understanding correctly, then this patch tries to support building against an OpenSSL source tree (or perhaps a build directory where only make libs has been executed)? If that assumption is correct, then I would suggest to use a separate configure argument to support this build option, e.g. --with-ssl-srcdir. Kaspar
[VOTE] Adopt the comments.a.o system to the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of the httpd docs
After many an attempt, we now have LDAP authentication for comments.apache.org set up, and the comment system is ready to roll. Any committer that wishes to moderate comments can now do so using their Apache credentials. With that in order, and with the comment system already tested in our trunk branch (as well as on the Apache Traffic Server site), I would propose that we also adopt this new system for the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of our documentation, so we can get some useful comments from the majority of people who don't normally visit the trunk docs. Voting will last the usual 72 hours, standard majority consensus applies. If you haven't already, I suggest you try out the system by either posting a comment somewhere or by logging onto the moderator control panel and familiarizing yourself with it. [ ] +1: Adopt the comments.a.o system in the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of docs [ ] 0: I don't care [ ] -1: Don't adopt the system, because With regards, Daniel.
Re: [VOTE] Adopt the comments.a.o system to the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of the httpd docs
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 10:33:56PM +0200, Daniel Gruno wrote: [ ] +1: Adopt the comments.a.o system in the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of docs [ ] 0: I don't care [X] -1: Don't adopt the system, because Only trunk is CTR. vh Mads Toftum -- http://soulfood.dk
Re: [VOTE] Adopt the comments.a.o system to the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of the httpd docs
On 07/08/2012 10:33 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: [X] +1: Adopt the comments.a.o system in the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of docs [ ] 0: I don't care [ ] -1: Don't adopt the system, because Forgot to cast my own vote - so there.
mod_mime_magic doesn't process files smaller than 63 bytes?
Hi, I just ran into an interesting Problem. There are two gif files without extensions and one gets delivered as image/gif and the other as text/plain. What I found is that if I append 0-bytes to the text/plain gif (a 1x1 transparent pixel gif) then it get delivered as soon as the size reaches 63 bytes. I can't really think of a reason why a small file shouldn't be processed like other files. The gif entry in the mime magic files just checks for the first three bytes being GIF so I think this file should be recognized. The Apache version I'm using is 2.2.15 from CentOS 6. I've also tried this with 2.2.22 from Fedora 15 and see the same issue there. Any idea what could be going on here? Regards, Dennis
Re: [VOTE] Adopt the comments.a.o system to the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of the httpd docs
+1! - Original Message - From: Daniel Gruno rum...@cord.dk To: dev@httpd.apache.org; d...@httpd.apache.org Cc: Sent: Sunday, July 8, 2012 6:22 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adopt the comments.a.o system to the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of the httpd docs On 07/08/2012 10:33 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: [X] +1: Adopt the comments.a.o system in the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of docs [ ] 0: I don't care [ ] -1: Don't adopt the system, because Forgot to cast my own vote - so there.
