Fwd: Getting Ready for FOSDEM 2017

FYI, if you're going to be at FOSDEM in February, it would be awesome to see you there, and we can use some help promoting the ASF at the booth. Forwarded Message Subject: Getting Ready for FOSDEM 2017 Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 13:30:49 - From: Sharan Foga

Re: [proposed] 2.4 Maintenance SIG

On 01/04/2017 11:55 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: On 04 Jan 2017, at 8:37 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: So, there's 3k of the 20k. And remember, my point was that we can fix what I call "dead code" with good old fashioned legwork. I don't advocate trashing trunk, and I don't

Re: svn commit: r1777460 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_filters.c

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:08 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >>> Do we want this for the 2.2 release? >> >> I don't feel

Re: svn commit: r1777460 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_filters.c

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:08 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >> Do we want this for the 2.2 release? > > I don't feel strongly about this. > > It is such an unusual edge case (I believe Yann pointed out it

Re: 2.2 needs a reviewer for http strict backport ...

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 3:03 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Eric Covener wrote: >> >> 2.2 running clean under test suite for me on Linux. > > Same here, thanks Eric for backporting. > > PS: I had to apply the OPENSSL_NO_SSL3 patch

Re: [proposed] 2.4 Maintenance SIG

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: > On 01/04/2017 11:55 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: >> >> On 04 Jan 2017, at 8:37 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: >>> >>> So, there's 3k of the 20k. And remember, my point was that we can >>> fix what I call

Re: svn commit: r1777460 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_filters.c

Do we want this for the 2.2 release? On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 7:31 AM, wrote: > Author: ylavic > Date: Thu Jan 5 12:31:48 2017 > New Revision: 1777460 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1777460=rev > Log: > http: allow folding in check_headers(), still compliant with

Re: svn commit: r1777460 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_filters.c

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > Do we want this for the 2.2 release? I don't feel strongly about this. It is such an unusual edge case (I believe Yann pointed out it was a custom module he was working around) that it should rarely be seen in the wild.

Re: Fixing module-specific, public include/*.h file inclusion on trunk

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 1:22 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:57 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: >> >> So today's primary bogus result is courtesy of is due to leaving >> public headers hiding in modules/class/*.h paths for our

Re: svn commit: r1777460 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_filters.c

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> >> But if any of you fears a possible regression for older 2.2.x apps (I >> see now that Eric included a test, I personnaly tested it this >>

Re: 2.2 needs a reviewer for http strict backport ...

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > > 2.2 running clean under test suite for me on Linux. Same here, thanks Eric for backporting. PS: I had to apply the OPENSSL_NO_SSL3 patch for my debian (libssl-1.0.2) to compile. One more vote please ;) PPS: The other

Re: 2.2.x release on the horizon

Exported revision 1777442. No go: Error13error C2143: syntax error : missing ';' before 'type' E:\VC10\Win32\httpd-2.2.32\modules\proxy\mod_proxy.c1093 Error14error C2065: 'post_status' : undeclared identifier E:\VC10\Win32\httpd-2.2.32\modules\proxy\mod_proxy.c

Re: 2.2.x release on the horizon

Thanks Steffen for testing. On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Steffen wrote: > Exported revision 1777442. > > No go: > > Error 13 error C2143: syntax error : missing ';' before 'type' > E:\VC10\Win32\httpd-2.2.32\modules\proxy\mod_proxy.c 1093 > Error 14 error C2065:

Re: svn commit: r1777390 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:37 AM, Eric Covener wrote: >> + wrowe asks: covener, would you apply? I'd like to have at least a >> second >> + pair of hands and eyes on merging this to branches/2.2.x >> and >> + am happy to compare/verify

Re: 2.2.x release on the horizon

It builds now on VC10 with the patch. I cannot test is extensive, I have no test site for 2.2. Btw. I already stopped distributing 2.2 for some time. Regards, Steffen AL On Thursday 05/01/2017 at 11:40, Yann Ylavic wrote: Thanks Steffen for testing. On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:02 AM,

Re: 2.2.x release on the horizon

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Steffen wrote: > It builds now on VC10 with the patch. Good, so I'll "promote" it as showstopper. > > I cannot test is extensive, I have no test site for 2.2. > > Btw. I already stopped distributing 2.2 for some time. Oh well, good to

Re: 2.2.x release on the horizon

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 6:12 AM, Steffen wrote: > It builds now on VC10 with the patch. > > I cannot test is extensive, I have no test site for 2.2. Thanks for jumping on the request so quickly. > Btw. I already stopped distributing 2.2 for some time. Double-thanks in