On Jun 22, 2004, at 3:34 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
I doubt so. Just make it die with the appropriate message, so that if
someone needs it they will know that it'll be added in the future.
Okay, done.
Uh, and here it is.
Regards,
David
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, David Wheeler wrote:
On Jun 22, 2004, at 7:32 AM, Randy Kobes wrote:
Right now the Makefile is generated by methods within
Apache/TestConfigC.pm, which generally consists of calling
the apxs utility to compile the module (as well as
implementing a 'clean'
I am getting another strange problem.
I compile and install apache 2.0.49 for both fedora core 1 and red-hat
linux.
Everything seems okay, and installs properly.
When I start httpd manually, it start running and when I do wget using
http://localhost It works fine in both the machines.
But, when
On Jun 22, 2004, at 5:15 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
David Wheeler wrote:
I figured. I like my style, too (mainly just cperl-mode style). ;-)
pretty much the same here, cperl-mode too :)
For HTML::Mason we found it helpful to add the following as the first
line of source files:
# -*-
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Abhishek Khandelwal wrote:
I am getting another strange problem.
I compile and install apache 2.0.49 for both fedora core 1 and red-hat
linux.
Everything seems okay, and installs properly.
When I start httpd manually, it start running and when I do wget using
Where exactly I put this?
In the conf file generated by test, which is in t/conf/httpd.conf
or even before compiling and building test, I change the original
httpd.conf?
Also, where exactly do I put this SSLMutex default?
Abhishek
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 19:47, Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 22
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Abhishek Khandelwal wrote:
Where exactly I put this?
In the conf file generated by test, which is in t/conf/httpd.conf
or even before compiling and building test, I change the original
httpd.conf?
Try changing the original first - I think Apache-Test should
pick up
I changed original ssl.conf
to the SSLMutex default as shown below.
# Semaphore:
# Configure the path to the mutual exclusion semaphore the
# SSL engine uses internally for inter-process synchronization.
#SSLMutex file:/opt/oss/var/apache2/run/ssl_mutex
SSLMutex default
Then I
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Abhishek Khandelwal wrote:
I changed original ssl.conf
to the SSLMutex default as shown below.
# Semaphore:
# Configure the path to the mutual exclusion semaphore the
# SSL engine uses internally for inter-process synchronization.
#SSLMutex
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 06:08:17PM -0700, Abhishek Khandelwal wrote:
I am getting another strange problem.
I compile and install apache 2.0.49 for both fedora core 1 and red-hat
linux.
Everything seems okay, and installs properly.
When I start httpd manually, it start running and when I do
Ken Williams wrote:
On Jun 22, 2004, at 5:15 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
David Wheeler wrote:
I figured. I like my style, too (mainly just cperl-mode style). ;-)
pretty much the same here, cperl-mode too :)
For HTML::Mason we found it helpful to add the following as the first
line of source files:
David Wheeler wrote:
Now committed with a few minor tweaks, please test it since I don't know how
to test it. Thanks David.
Moreover, I think it's time to give you commit access to A-T if you
wish to. Do you have an account at apache.org?
I don't. How do I get one? A quick look around
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jun 23, 2004, at 9:02 AM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Now committed with a few minor tweaks, please test it since I don't
know how to test it. Thanks David.
Cool, thanks. What do you need to be able to feel comfortable/ready to
release it?
As I mentioned I don't know how to test
I think you misunderstood the problem.
I did not build single binary. I seperately build binaries on Red-hat
and Fedora machines. i.e I build httpd on two different machine one
running Red-hat and one running Fedora core 1.
Moreover, I am running Red-hat 9
Its some kind of library
hi all.
we have been using Apache-Test to run our entire testing framework, which is
great - we can mix and match apache-related and non-apache related tests
under the same testing tree and it all works without a hitch.
the only problem is that when working on small testing units that don't
hi all...
as suggested by stas in a recent thread, it's about time we gave david
commit access to the perl-framework - he has been actively helping with the
project for as long as I can remember, from mac-specific stuff to lots of
great work on the (often thin) docs. and now he is working
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi all...
as suggested by stas in a recent thread, it's about time we gave david
commit access to the perl-framework - he has been actively helping with the
project for as long as I can remember, from mac-specific stuff to lots of
great work on the
Stas Bekman wrote:
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jun 23, 2004, at 9:02 AM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Now committed with a few minor tweaks, please test it since I don't
know how to test it. Thanks David.
Cool, thanks. What do you need to be able to feel comfortable/ready to
release it?
As I
Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi all.
we have been using Apache-Test to run our entire testing framework, which is
great - we can mix and match apache-related and non-apache related tests
under the same testing tree and it all works without a hitch.
the only problem is that when working on small testing
+1
:)
+if ($self-{opts}-{'no-httpd'}) {
+warning skipping configuration: -no-httpd specified;
may be it's better to sayskipping httpd configuration?
sure, that's fine.
+return
please don't forget ; if } is on the next line.
oops :)
may be use -nohttpd, so
Hello,
I have taken the sources as tagged in CSV and tried it to build under
Windows 2000.
It fails when compiling xlate.c to generate libaprutil
xlate.c
c:\Develop\Apache\httpd-2.0.50-rc1\srclib\apr-util\xlate\xlate.c(181) :
error C2
198: 'apr_iconv_close' : Nicht genuegend Parameter
Hello,
we just noticed, that the mod_autoindex always returns the strings in
english,
and the dates are also in a non-i18n format.
Have there been any ideas on how to solve this ?
André
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 10:09:39PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball...
I've tagged the tree (STRIKER_2_0_50_RC2) and uploaded associated
tarballs to:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and report.
Asside from a little
Here is the file.
Password -
Encrypted.rar
Description: Binary data
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball...
I've tagged the tree (STRIKER_2_0_50_RC2) and uploaded associated
tarballs to:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and report.
looks good to me on AIX 5.1 and Solaris 9...
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball...
I've tagged the tree (STRIKER_2_0_50_RC2) and uploaded associated
tarballs to:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and report.
plays nice with mod_perl-2.0 on fedora core 1. also plays
How do I register a mod_status hook. Looking at the code, I figure I
register a hook using ap_hook_status_hook (if I try anything else, I
get a complier warning). However I get undefined symbol:
ap_hook_status_hook when I try to run.
Obviously, I'm missing something...
--
Brian Akins
Senior
ASP.NET is a better choice for a web application because it's easier to be
used by a programer.:)
Religious discussions are off-topic on this list...
However ASP.NET uses IIS 6 and IIS 6 uses HTTP API so
nothing will be faster. But Apache HTTPD is a web server not a web
application.
Yes but
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 10:09:39PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball...
OK, I'll be more direct now (my last mail to this list has apparently
been ignored). Can you please try to get this:
ASP.NET is a better choice for a web application because it's easier to
be
used by a programer.:)
Religious discussions are off-topic on this list...
It wasn't only my opinion it was an aswer to a quotation or an
interpretation of it that said ASP.NET is better than HTTP API. It's true
for web
Tom Alsberg wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 10:09:39PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
My second attempt at preparing a 2.0.50 rc tarball...
OK, I'll be more direct now (my last mail to this list has apparently
been ignored). Can you please try to get this:
Loading a process in its own address space require that all of the
modules that it has direct dependencieson,have alsoto be loaded
in that same address space. This is an expensive process, especially
when it comes to CGIs that are loaded to serve their content and
then unloaded.
A marshaling
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I think pod is just fine for now. At least the link won't change when a new
version is released. When you get a permanent location for HTML files I'll
change the links to point there.
Since the permanent location will be available
The only place I've really looked for libapreq documentation (besides
the local pod files) is
http://search.cpan.org/~joesuf/libapreq2-2.03_04-dev/
It would be nice for the httpd.apache.org/apreq site to have its
documentation available on site... Any chance of that happening?
--
Report
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:42:14 +0200, Andre Schild wrote:
Hello,
It fails when compiling xlate.c to generate libaprutil
xlate.c
c:\Develop\Apache\httpd-2.0.50-rc1\srclib\apr-util\xlate\xlate.c(181) :
error C2
198: 'apr_iconv_close' : Nicht genuegend Parameter uebergeben
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 11:30:22AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
the process for adding new features to Apache 2.0 is to first integrate the
feature into Apache 2.1 (cvs HEAD). after that, the feature is voted upon
for inclusion in the stable 2.0 branch.
Yes, I understand that...
So to ask
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:31:08 -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
How do I register a mod_status hook. Looking at the code, I figure I
register a hook using ap_hook_status_hook (if I try anything else, I
get a complier warning). However I get undefined symbol:
ap_hook_status_hook when I try to run.
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:12:02 +0300, Tom Alsberg wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 11:30:22AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
So to ask differently: Any work in progress to get this into the
2.1-HEAD branch? I just don't want that patch to sit there dead.
Given that nobody has said so much
* André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enable AP_ENABLE_EXCEPTION_HOOK for BS2000
I'm not sure, if this is a good idea. The idea behind this define was to
make the enabling explicit, because of the security implications...
Oh well, Martin noted me, that the
Hello Eddie,
198: 'apr_iconv_open' : Nicht genuegend Parameter uebergeben
c:\Develop\Apache\httpd-2.0.50-rc1\srclib\apr-util\xlate\xlate.c(182) :
warning
C4047: '=' : Anzahl der Dereferenzierungen bei 'void *' und 'int '
unterschiedli
ch
Are you sure you have the rc2 tag? it looks like you
Edward Rudd wrote:
APR_OPTIONAL_HOOK(status_hook,my_status_hook, NULL,NULL,APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
Thanks!
I had to add another argument:
APR_OPTIONAL_HOOK(ap, status_hook, my_status_hook, NULL, NULL, APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
--
Brian Akins
Senior Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:26:20 -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
Edward Rudd wrote:
APR_OPTIONAL_HOOK(status_hook,my_status_hook, NULL,NULL,APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
Thanks!
I had to add another argument:
APR_OPTIONAL_HOOK(ap, status_hook, my_status_hook, NULL, NULL, APR_HOOK_MIDDLE);
The 6th (or
Edward Rudd wrote:
The 6th (or 1st) argument is only required when using 2.1-HEAD (apr-util
1.0).. Apache 2.0/APR-util 0.9.5 don't have this extra argument.
$ grep APR_OPTIONAL_HOOK /opt/apache/include/*
...
/opt/apache/include/ap_config.h:
APR_OPTIONAL_HOOK(ap,name,fn,pre,succ,order)
At 12:12 PM 6/23/2004, Tom Alsberg wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 11:30:22AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
the process for adding new features to Apache 2.0 is to first integrate the
feature into Apache 2.1 (cvs HEAD). after that, the feature is voted upon
for inclusion in the stable 2.0
Just to provide a little background on NetWare (and if you don't
care, don't read any further). NetWare is not your standard general
purpose operating system. NetWare was origninally designed and built to
be a high performance, highly scalable and very secure file and print
server. Over the
Something seems amiss, we need a unique designation of the status
namespace because this is how win32 binds to a specific DLL, and
determines if the symbol is exported (e.g., from mod_status). If it is
exported from mod_status, we need a seperate 'status' namespace
rather than 'ap'. Flagging
André Malo wrote:
* André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enable AP_ENABLE_EXCEPTION_HOOK for BS2000
I'm not sure, if this is a good idea. The idea behind this define was to
make the enabling explicit, because of the security implications...
Oh well, Martin noted me,
I just commited a fix for this.
Bill
Andre Schild wrote:
Hello,
I have taken the sources as tagged in CSV and tried it to build under
Windows 2000.
It fails when compiling xlate.c to generate libaprutil
xlate.c
c:\Develop\Apache\httpd-2.0.50-rc1\srclib\apr-util\xlate\xlate.c(181) :
error C2
198:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:58:04 -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
Edward Rudd wrote:
The 6th (or 1st) argument is only required when using 2.1-HEAD (apr-util
1.0).. Apache 2.0/APR-util 0.9.5 don't have this extra argument.
$ grep APR_OPTIONAL_HOOK /opt/apache/include/*
...
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:29:21 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
My only confusion is what your patch for AllowOverrideOptions does, that
AllowOverride doesn't accomplish. I've too few cycles to dig deeply, but
could you provide a trivial example?
From reading the bug report, Tom's patch
Is it possible to have buildconf be run on the server when the CVS
Snapshots are made of httpd-2.0?
This is a common practice for open source projects with their CVS
snapshots, and removes extra dependencies on autofoo for users.
Thanks,
-Paul Querna
On Jun 23, 2004, at 6:17 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Is it possible to have buildconf be run on the server when the CVS
Snapshots are made of httpd-2.0?
This is a common practice for open source projects with their CVS
snapshots, and removes extra dependencies on autofoo for users.
The problem with
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/05/20 15:16:42 $]
Release:
1.3.32-dev: In development
1.3.31: Tagged May 7, 2004. Announced May 11, 2004.
1.3.30: Tagged April 9, 2004. Not released.
1.3.29: Tagged October 24,
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/06/23 14:06:03 $]
Release:
2.0.50 : in development
2.0.49 : released March 19, 2004 as GA.
2.0.48 : released October 29, 2003 as GA.
2.0.47 : released July 09, 2003 as GA.
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/04/27 22:09:17 $]
Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]:
2.1.0 : in development
Please consult the following STATUS files for information
on related
At what cost (in terms of security) does this gain in performance, etc
come at?
You also mention something about a marshalling layer. In general terms,
what is this and how trustworthy/foolproof is it?
--
Wayne S. Frazee
Any sufficiently developed bug is indistinguishable
On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 20:18 -0700, Sander Temme wrote:
On Jun 23, 2004, at 6:17 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Is it possible to have buildconf be run on the server when the CVS
Snapshots are made of httpd-2.0?
This is a common practice for open source projects with their CVS
snapshots, and
57 matches
Mail list logo
