Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 09:56:12AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
Aha! Excellent, Geoff! Does it solve the problem by moving those
default_module calls after getting httpd config?
Moving the calls one line further on fixed it for me. OK to check in?
(BTW your patch had whitespace
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 01:17:04AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
I'd rather see it moved two statements (it still works, doesn't it?) so
the eapi comes right after inherit_config. Otherwise, yes, please commit it.
Yes, great, done.
so are we all clean now? Any other problems?
No failures with
Geoffrey Young wrote:
As a result of my changes, now the API has two wrappers
Apache::Test::config (full config as before), and
Apache::Test::basic_config, which is the same sans httpd information.
For example to autogenerate t/TEST and other files you don't need to
know anything about httpd, and
Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 01:17:04AM -0700, Stas Bekman wrote:
I'd rather see it moved two statements (it still works, doesn't it?) so
the eapi comes right after inherit_config. Otherwise, yes, please commit it.
Yes, great, done.
so are we all clean now? Any other problems?
No
Geoffrey Young wrote:
But things are getting more and more fragile and dependant on each
other
indeed. right now a fresh checkout will not even run for me because I don't
have an ssl-enabled apache to run against. this is not a minor issue, as I
suspect I'm in the majority for normal users.
Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
But things are getting more and more fragile and dependant on each
other
indeed. right now a fresh checkout will not even run for me because I
don't
have an ssl-enabled apache to run against. this is not a minor issue,
as I
suspect I'm in the majority
apr_off_t gets defined as a long on linux i386 and an off_t on x86_64.
apr_off_t used as a byte counter rolls over fairly quickly on i386.
Suggestions?
--
Brian Akins
Senior Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 09:23:36AM -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
apr_off_t gets defined as a long on linux i386 and an off_t on x86_64.
apr_off_t used as a byte counter rolls over fairly quickly on i386.
Suggestions?
Stick with x86_64 :) Or use HEAD where apr_off_t is an off64_t on i386
too.
Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 09:23:36AM -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
apr_off_t gets defined as a long on linux i386 and an off_t on x86_64.
apr_off_t used as a byte counter rolls over fairly quickly on i386.
Suggestions?
Stick with x86_64 :)
Wish i could :)
Or use HEAD where
Brian Akins wrote:
Or use HEAD where apr_off_t is an off64_t on i386
too.
any plan to backport this? All my counters are rolling over :(
That sounds like the kind of thing that would break binary
compatability, so I imagine it won't be backported.
-garrett
Any interest in this for HEAD? Patch below adds a test_config hook
which allows modules to do extra checking when httpd is invoked with -t.
The new -t -D DUMP_MODULES feature can be implemented this way rather
than hooking into mod_so from server/main.c, which I think is slightly
cleaner; it's
Hi all,
We've finished the initial development of extended mod_proxy.
Since the development took place at jakata-tomcat-connectors,
the source code can be found under ajp/proxy.
Here is the list of major features added:
1. AJP13 protocol support
2. Connection pool for threaded servers
3. Added new
I've written a module to ARM4 instrument Apache 2. I'd like to donate this module to the ASF and ideally put
it in the modules/experimental directory (or somewhere else in the ASF where we can place it under cvs
control?). The ARM4 API headers are available from the Open Group website at
So, after a quick look at the website, it looks like ARM4 is some sort
of SNMP on Steroids?
Also, the License is quite important for any possibility of donating any
module to the ASF I think that needs to be pinned down before any
discussion can really move forward.
Finally, can you explain
On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 16:24 +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
Any interest in this for HEAD? Patch below adds a test_config hook
which allows modules to do extra checking when httpd is invoked with -t.
The new -t -D DUMP_MODULES feature can be implemented this way rather
than hooking into mod_so from
Doesn't some de minimis treatment through the incubator still apply? There
are two templates, one for a full project's incubation, one for a lightweight
pass through IP vetting. ++1 here for submission to the incubator as
a new httpd instrumentation subproject. Also happy to help on the ppmc.
At 11:14 AM 8/11/2004, Mladen Turk wrote:
We've finished the initial development of extended mod_proxy.
Since the development took place at jakata-tomcat-connectors,
the source code can be found under ajp/proxy.
That's something of a shame, because we lose the development
history importing the
On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 12:08 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[..snip..]
-1 on experimental - it needs to die :) Look how long it's taken to get cache
stable. If that module was only placed in the main distro once it was fully
complete, it would have been finished far sooner. In general,
At 02:15 PM 8/7/2004, Costin wrote:
Now let's see how to get this in Apache2.0...
Gonna try to make that happen, if I can somehow merge history (ick)
It would be great if we would have at least one or 2 people who are committers in
both projects. Since we can't propose Mladen in apache, maybe
At 11:14 AM 8/11/2004, Mladen Turk wrote:
The connection pool enables reusing backend connections
and was build around apr_reslist. At the moment only the
proxy_ajp extensively uses this connection pool, with
performance slightly better then mod_jk.
I noticed one huge win - unless I'm
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
We've finished the initial development of extended mod_proxy.
Since the development took place at jakata-tomcat-connectors,
the source code can be found under ajp/proxy.
I'm entirely +1 today for bringing it back into modules/proxy/ (it's
a c-t-r branch.) How you did
Sorry for any cross-posting!
Hello,
My name is Frauke Lehmann and I'm writing my master thesis about the
social formation of free software/open source (FS/OS) developers. A
questionnaire is one part of my research - besides interviews and
observations.
It would be really nice, if you supported
At 12:48 PM 8/11/2004, Paul Querna wrote:
On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 12:08 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[..snip-snip..]
In general, new modules into 2.0 doesn't seem to make alot of sense
since 2.2 will release before ApacheCon (straightforward goal, don't
you think?.)
I hope so, but at the
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
That's something of a shame, because we lose the development
history importing the finished effort, and it was further disappointing
that you didn't bring across the earlier cvs history so this branch
could be brought back into httpd/modules/proxy with a complete
Graham Leggett wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm actually very excited that we can offer in the 2.2 release - this
really rocks. What you accomplished is very cool!
I'm entirely +1 today for bringing it back into modules/proxy/ (it's a
c-t-r branch.) How you did it makes this a
At 12:54 PM 8/11/2004, you wrote:
Never cross my mind that we'll need all those try-error-fix
commits back on the httpd cvs tree.
We actually like those - the next individual to say wow - this fix is easy!
can go back over history and say grumf - they tried that in the first place
:)
--On Wednesday, August 11, 2004 4:24 PM +0100 Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Any interest in this for HEAD? Patch below adds a test_config hook
which allows modules to do extra checking when httpd is invoked with -t.
The new -t -D DUMP_MODULES feature can be implemented this way rather
than
At 01:03 PM 8/11/2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
That's something of a shame, because we lose the development
history importing the finished effort, and it was further disappointing
that you didn't bring across the earlier cvs history so this branch
could be brought back
Paul Querna wrote:
So, after a quick look at the website, it looks like ARM4 is some sort
of SNMP on Steroids?
Also, the License is quite important for any possibility of donating any
module to the ASF I think that needs to be pinned down before any
discussion can really move forward.
The
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
So, after a quick look at the website, it looks like ARM4 is some sort
of SNMP on Steroids?
Also, the License is quite important for any possibility of donating any
module to the ASF I think that needs to be pinned down before any
discussion can really
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Never cross my mind that we'll need all those try-error-fix
commits back on the httpd cvs tree.
We actually like those - the next individual to say wow - this fix is easy!
can go back over history and say grumf - they tried that in the first place
:)
Question...
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Doesn't some de minimis treatment through the incubator still apply? There
are two templates, one for a full project's incubation, one for a lightweight
pass through IP vetting. ++1 here for submission to the incubator as
a new httpd instrumentation subproject. Also
Mladen Turk wrote:
Since we are (Henri and myself, not sure for JeanFrederic) not
httpd commiters, I'm not sure how the proxy_ajp will get maintained,
but we can always send patches :)
I'm quite happy to maintain the code, and can chase up any patches you
send through in the mean time, if others
I'm finding ap_input_mode_t very restrictive as a linear enum
and would like to make it an enum of bitflags.
If I put together a patch, what are the chances it will be accepted?
It is for Apache 2.1/2.2 only, because it
a) breaks binary compatibility by changing the ap_input_mode_t values
b)
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Since it will take some time to assess that the changes and new features
are stable, v.s. dev quality, I believe it's sorta pointless to put extra energy
into the 2.0 backport. We won't compromise mod_proxy again in 2.0 after
its very slow crawl to some measure of
--On Wednesday, August 11, 2004 5:16 PM -0400 Glenn Strauss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm finding ap_input_mode_t very restrictive as a linear enum
and would like to make it an enum of bitflags.
Please back up a bit.
Why do you think the modes should be combined? -- justin
--On Wednesday, August 11, 2004 12:08 PM -0500 William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't some de minimis treatment through the incubator still apply? There
are two templates, one for a full project's incubation, one for a lightweight
pass through IP vetting. ++1 here for submission
Working backwards and allowing a little time for slip:
Nov 1: Planned final RC tarball for release of 2.2.0
Oct 1: Code freeze of all new features in 2.1-dev (for a month till we
branch head to 2.2.0 and bless HEAD as 2.3-dev)
Thoughts?
Bill
At 01:37 PM 8/11/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 01:03 PM 8/11/2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
My plan is to start bringing it into httpd v2.1 from next week, assessing
how hard the backports to httpd v2.0 would potentially be. Is the history
kept in the tomcat connector tree enough, or is it
* William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Working backwards and allowing a little time for slip:
Nov 1: Planned final RC tarball for release of 2.2.0
Oct 1: Code freeze of all new features in 2.1-dev (for a month till we
branch head to 2.2.0 and bless HEAD as 2.3-dev)
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/05/20 15:16:42 $]
Release:
1.3.32-dev: In development
1.3.31: Tagged May 7, 2004. Announced May 11, 2004.
1.3.30: Tagged April 9, 2004. Not released.
1.3.29: Tagged October 24,
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/08/11 17:13:51 $]
Release:
2.0.51 : in development
2.0.50 : released June 30, 2004 as GA.
2.0.49 : released March 19, 2004 as GA.
2.0.48 : released October 29, 2003 as GA.
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/04/27 22:09:17 $]
Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]:
2.1.0 : in development
Please consult the following STATUS files for information
on related
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 02:15 PM 8/7/2004, Costin wrote:
Now let's see how to get this in Apache2.0...
Gonna try to make that happen, if I can somehow merge history (ick)
It would be great if we would have at least one or 2 people who are committers in both projects. Since we can't
44 matches
Mail list logo
