On 02/06/2010, at 9:00 AM, toki...@aol.com wrote:
Sergey wrote...
That's new to me that browsers don't cache stuff that has Vary only on
Accept-Encoding - can you post some statistics or describe the test you ran?
Test results and statistics...
Apache DEV forum...
Mark Nottingham wrote...
On 02/06/2010, at 9:00 AM, toki...@aol.com wrote:
Sergey wrote...
That's new to me that browsers don't cache stuff that has Vary only on
Accept-Encoding - can you post some statistics or describe the test you
ran?
Test results and statistics...
On 04/06/2010, at 6:51 PM, toki...@aol.com wrote:
I think you need to do a reboot on your definition of 'anecdotal'.
Good for you.
The thread above was a focused discussion about what ACTUALLY
happens if you try to 'Vary:' on 'User-Agent' in the real world
these days accompanied by some
Hey folks,
I've gone through the list of RFC violation PRs in the STATUS file and here's
the summary:
15852 resolved fixed
15859 resolved fixed
15861 resolved fixed
15864 resolved invalid
15865 resolved remind (must)
15866 new (MUST), looks like it's fixed in trunk
15868 needinfo (MUST)
15869
Adam Hasselbalch Hansen wrote:
Thomas, Peter wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Adam Hasselbalch Hansen [mailto:a...@one.com] Sent: Tuesday, May
25, 2010 7:06 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: mod_ssl, SNI and dynamic virtual hosts
So what I'm attempting to get feedback on is
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 10:42:44PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
The patch is at
http://people.apache.org/~sf/per-module-loglevel-v4/ ,
This looks good to me. Kudos for taking on such a task. It's kind of
hard to review the individual patches with fixes-on-fixes separated out,
or the
-Original Message-
From: Joe Orton
Sent: Freitag, 4. Juni 2010 13:29
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Per-module / per-dir loglevel configuration version 4
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 10:42:44PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
The patch is at
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 01:40:42PM +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
memset(l-module_levels, val, total_modules +
DYNAMIC_MODULE_LIMIT);
Hm, module_levels is int[] and memset works byte wise.
Doh. Sorry, yes, ignore me there.
On Jun 3, 2010, at 12:58 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Thursday 03 June 2010, Sander Temme wrote:
On Jun 3, 2010, at 7:15 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
PHP should largely move to FastCGI, so module compatibility
should not be a problem. Any idea about other popular modules?
WSGI? mod_perl? Are
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:18 AM, Mark Nottingham m...@mnot.net wrote:
[...]
It's not a bug in the implementations, it's a grey area in 2616 that HTTPbis
has since worked to resolve;
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/147
By my reading of the attachments in that ticket, servers
On Jun 4, 2010, at 1:58 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 04.06.2010 01:51, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 03 Jun 2010, at 10:17 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
It would be, but it's necessary. The ASF is a collaborative environment;
unreviewed code should not released, even when the authors are
-Original Message-
From: Brian Pane [mailto:brianp...@gmail.com]
Sent: Freitag, 4. Juni 2010 14:39
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: canned deflate conf in manual -- time to drop
the NS4/vary?
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:18 AM, Mark Nottingham m...@mnot.net wrote:
[...]
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com wrote:
[...]
Isn't that what Transfer-Encoding is designed for?
Yes, and in fact if we were talking about a brand new protocol, I'd
probably argue in favor of putting the compression specifier in the
On 04 Jun 2010, at 7:27 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Why is this needed? mod_cache itself does not allow partial content
to be cached
and even if this does not work it should be fixed there and not in
one of the
storage providers.
mod_cache does allow a 206 to be cached, it is up to the
-Original Message-
From: Graham Leggett
Sent: Freitag, 4. Juni 2010 15:44
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r951222 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk:
CHANGES modules/cache/mod_disk_cache.c
On 04 Jun 2010, at 7:27 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Why is this needed?
On 04 Jun 2010, at 2:55 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
If there is not positive feedback from two reviewers, this code
does not
belong in trunk/. As a committer, you are *free* to create your own
sandboxes in svn to demonstrate code changes, if that helps
attract the
necessary review.
On 04 Jun 2010, at 2:51 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
+1 for the continued, and perhaps more widespread, voluntary
soliciting of approval in advance for changes which add new modules
or other significant new function, or make other widespread changes,
or change prerequisites in a meaningful way,
On 2010-06-03 at 22:28, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Not because of binary compatibility, but because users have certain
expectations when they move from x.y.15 to x.y.16 that nothing much
has changed, it's just lots of fixes. And if your backport ideas
include a lot of
On 2010-06-04 at 06:00, Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org wrote:
Hey folks,
I've gone through the list of RFC violation PRs in the STATUS file and here's
the summary:
Thanks for doing this.
On 04 Jun 2010, at 4:15 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
IMHO it does not (at least according to the comments and the code
looks like
to follow these):
This is only present on trunk, and this needs to be fixed too. The
problem we saw was in httpd v2.2.
implementation (mod_disk_cache)
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 04 Jun 2010, at 2:51 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
+1 for the continued, and perhaps more widespread, voluntary soliciting of
approval in advance for changes which add new modules or other significant
new function, or make
On 6/4/2010 9:35 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 04 Jun 2010, at 2:51 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
This has been done countless times by numerous people in this
successful decade, in spite of, and even for the continued viability
of, the C-T-R policy.
This creates an artificial two tier
Index: STATUS
===
--- STATUS (revision 951346)
+++ STATUS (working copy)
@@ -153,10 +153,10 @@
it, so that the server won't be slow down too much.
* RFC 2616 violations.
-Closed PRs: 15857.
-
On Jun 4, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
n.b.: I only have commit on docs, so I couldn't actually put that in place
Committed in r951477. Thanks for going through these.
S.
--
Sander Temme
scte...@apache.org
PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A
Hello!
Various sources suggest, the hook can be called several times -- could
someone summarize those times for the record?
For example, it appears, that upon start-up the hook is called once to
check the syntax and then again -- for real. Mod-developers can check
by recording previous
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 15:36:22 -0400
Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.com wrote:
My module, at least, is using some external libraries, so I can't rely
on the apr_pools for clean-ups. How do I know, when to free-up the
resources I've allocated?
I'm guessing that's the crux of your question.
04.06.2010 16:00, Nick Kew ???(??):
The answer is, yes you can and should use APR pools.
To translate this answer: no, there is no hook invoked, when a module
should clean-up... Thanks.
What about the rest of my question -- about the sequence of post_config
hook invocations?
-mi
On 04 Jun 2010, at 6:06 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
All individuals are invited to chime in when a proposal is raised,
and to
invest the time in reviewing the proposal. That includes non
committers.
There are no tiers, except for contributor, committer, and project
committee
member.
On Friday 04 June 2010, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
This seems to be a very good solution, and the fact that their are
no constructor-time calls to initialize this should avoid any
platform quirks.
My only question is; are we assured to have the same module_index
reassigned on each
On 6/4/2010 4:47 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Since we are only initializing a pointer into the module struct, it
really does not matter if the module_index changes or not. If the
module is not reloaded, the address of the module struct stays the
same. If the module is reloaded, the pointer
On Friday 04 June 2010, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
which are either pure bug fixes or pretty trivial. I will create a
new patch series without these soon, hopefully tomorrow.
The next iteration is at
http://people.apache.org/~sf/per-module-loglevel-v5/
I have included Rainer's and Joe's
All of you folks who have to answer user questions, go ahead and ready your
hate mail :)
I've been playing some with Varnish (long story) and lots of people seem to
like it. The config language (VCL) is just a thin wrapper on top of C.
Heck, you can just write C inline.
Also, I do a good bit
On Jun 4, 2010, at 1:23 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
CTR is fine for all normal fixes. RTC is always preferred for major code
refactorings.
I ask you this: What constitutes a modest new feature? It's not a fix. It's
not a major code refactoring. But modest new features have been strongly
All of you folks who have to answer user questions, go ahead and ready
your
hate mail :)
This is not a hate-mail (:
I've been playing some with Varnish (long story) and lots of people
seem to
like it. The config language (VCL) is just a thin wrapper on top of
C.
Heck, you can just
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Akins, Brian brian.ak...@turner.com wrote:
All of you folks who have to answer user questions, go ahead and ready your
hate mail :)
I've been playing some with Varnish (long story) and lots of people seem to
like it. The config language (VCL) is just a thin
On 6/4/10 7:30 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
Are you using LuaJIT 2? The performance numbers its putting up seemed
very impressive.
Yes and meh...
--
Brian Akins
Changing the semantics of Accept-Encoding / Content-Encoding is likely out of
scope for HTTPbis; I have a hard time believing it wouldn't make existing
implementations non-conformant, which we can really only do if there's a
serious security or interoperability concern.
OTOH I think it would
On 06/05/2010 12:51 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
Not a terribly interesting read, but we are seriously considering just
using
straight C with some helper functions and macros as the config for
one of
our projects.
And, for the record I was wrong in the past - yes, async is the
answer...
I've been a
On Jun 4, 2010, at 4:32 PM, Akins, Brian brian.ak...@turner.com
wrote:
On 6/4/10 7:30 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
Are you using LuaJIT 2? The performance numbers its putting up
seemed
very impressive.
Yes and meh...
bummer.
The most iteresting thing in this space
39 matches
Mail list logo
