Hi Eric,
On 02.08.2011 04:40, Eric Covener wrote:
I'm setting up a new system to test httpd releases, with a crufty OS
that doesn't have good packaged prereqs and doesn't have years of my
own kludges giving me anything for free.
I've built and installed zlib into a random directory. I
Hi Eric,
On 02.08.2011 04:51, cove...@apache.org wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Tue Aug 2 02:51:19 2011
New Revision: 1153004
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1153004view=rev
Log:
whitespace change only to indent the block wrapped in a new ifModule in
r1153003
Modified:
Line 48 is surrounded by
if test x$ap_zlib_base = x; then
and ap_zlib_base ist set when using --with-z. So in this case the
automatic detection part should be skipped.
What problem do you actually observe?
Can't get it to misbehave at all this morning, even in a new scratch
directory,
Did you note, that there's already one IfModul around the FilterProvider
in the 2.3.0 case? We should not need nested IfModule for the same
module.
Note that originally there was also an includes filter defined. It now
is no more if mod_deflate is not available. To see, what would be
On 02.08.2011 13:00, Eric Covener wrote:
Line 48 is surrounded by
if test x$ap_zlib_base = x; then
and ap_zlib_base ist set when using --with-z. So in this case the
automatic detection part should be skipped.
What problem do you actually observe?
Can't get it to misbehave at all this
For some (old 2007) context, see:
http://markmail.org/message/btwcnbl2i7ftwj4n
https://community.jivesoftware.com/message/201787
I am proxying an app via AJP to Tomcat 6/7. In certain circumstances, it
appears that the app (or possibly Tomcat) is erroneously sending a flush before
the
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
The tarballs for httpd-2.3.14 are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please VOTE on whether to release these as Apache httpd-2.3.14,
beta.
+0 for beta, Ubuntu Natty/gcc/ia32 and AIX 6.1/xlc/PPC64 w/
On 8/1/2011 4:43 PM, Steffen wrote:
See in the change log no fixes for the reported Windows issues by Gregg and
me.
For me, no further testing in real live possible.
Understandable, thanks for the detailed analysis. This may go beta anyways,
as we expect issues to be raised with beta tags
On 7/31/2011 4:17 AM, Kaspar Brand wrote:
Hi Rainer,
There was a similar discussion RFC: drop support for OpenSSL 1.0 in
trunk/2.3? on this list in May/June 2010.
Thanks for the pointer! (Too long ago for me to remember, but should
have searched the archives, that's true.)
- drop
Hi Stefan,
thanks for applying.
On Saturday, 30 July 2011 17:41:39 Torsten Förtsch wrote:
The last if statement should read as follows to avoid the loop:
if (APR_BUCKET_IS_METADATA(e)) {
e = APR_BUCKET_NEXT(e);
continue;
}
I don't
Non binding +1
Tested on Windows with VC9
11 matches
Mail list logo
