As per Igor's advice, I'm forwarding this message to the dev@ and
modules-dev@ lists as well:
Hello all httpd document lovers,
As per our nifty little STATUS document, it came to my attention that we
were missing an
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:12:31AM +0200, Daniel Gruno wrote:
As per Igor's advice, I'm forwarding this message to the dev@ and
modules-dev@ lists as well:
Hello all httpd document lovers,
As per our nifty little
As per Igor's advice, I'm forwarding this message to the dev@ and
modules-dev@ lists as well:
Hello all httpd document lovers,
As per our nifty little STATUS document, it came to my attention that we
were missing an
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:08 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 4/10/2012 8:27 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 11:55 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 4/10/2012 10:31 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:05 AM,
Hi Daniel,
The draft is already a great document and very useful for Httpd application
developers. And I think it could be more helpful if it provides some guidelines
for updating modules from 2.2.x to 2.4.x, or some way to use the new 2.4
features.
Regards,
Bing
-邮件原件-
发件人:
I'm planning on letting the vote run for a few more days, just
in case, and, if all is well, we can announce on Monday.
Good news always should be announced early in the week :)
On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Bing Swen bs...@pku.edu.cn wrote:
Hi Daniel,
The draft is already a great document and very useful for Httpd application
developers. And I think it could be more helpful if it provides some
guidelines for updating modules from 2.2.x to 2.4.x, or some way to
On 11-04-2012 16:46, r...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Nice work, and I bet it'll be helpful for new module authors. Just a
small bug: in your example on configuration setting, in the function
'example_create_dir_conf(...)' your code returns 'dir' which isn't
declared in function scope. Shouldn't this
Hi folks,
I'm currently trying to test a very minimal setup of httpd
trunk, and I'm failing because few disables a number of
modules our test suite takes for granted.
Right now I'm stuck in t/modules/alias.t
having a hard time deciding how to proceed since I don't know
the test suite well
Hi folks,
I've updated Marko Kevac's patch to allow for multiple
pools in mod_dbd. I'd like to ask for reviews and opinions
in particular this here seems a bit odd:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28585action=diff#modules/database/mod_dbd.c_sec20
It's in the nature of
Hi Igor,
On 11.04.2012 19:48, Igor Galić wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm currently trying to test a very minimal setup of httpd
trunk, and I'm failing because few disables a number of
modules our test suite takes for granted.
Right now I'm stuck in t/modules/alias.t
having a hard time deciding how to
all tests seems wrong, as we'd skip all tests then. Is there a
way to do explain to the plan that *some* tests require an
additional module?
Don't know. I usually test with reallyall, but most should work as
well.
And few shouldn't?
If that's a feature, perhaps we should put it in the
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 24.03.2012 16:39, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de
wrote:
On 24.03.2012 07:02, Kaspar Brand wrote:
On 23.03.2012 18:11, Rainer Jung wrote:
It should
I wonder if you would consider this a bug. Here is the situation.
I had a config file in conf.d which loaded some modules. Alphabetically, it
came after the loading of the vhost files. The IfModule blocks would not work.
In this same order, if I don't use IfModule, the directives still work
14 matches
Mail list logo
