On 08.07.2012 22:33, Daniel Gruno wrote:
[ ] +1: Adopt the comments.a.o system in the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of docs
[ ] 0: I don't care
[ ] -1: Don't adopt the system, because
Thanks for enduring your work on this - glad to see that it has become
comments.a.o. in the meantime! I'm in favor
On 07/11/2012 08:24 AM, Kaspar Brand wrote:
On 08.07.2012 22:33, Daniel Gruno wrote:
[ ] +1: Adopt the comments.a.o system in the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of docs
[ ] 0: I don't care
[ ] -1: Don't adopt the system, because
Thanks for enduring your work on this - glad to see that it has
On 2012-07-11 05:09, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Just how supported and standard is this? Chrome seems to use it
for something else:
http://code.google.com/p/gears/wiki/ResumableHttpRequestsProposal
I was told by Google that they are phasing this out (this may already
have happened), and
Roy, as Main Dude for compliance, any issue with getting
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53292
into trunk (and 2.4.x)?
On Jul 11, 2012, at 3:51 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
On 2012-07-11 05:09, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Just how supported and standard is this? Chrome seems to
As to not clutter the vote with too much stuff, I'm posting a new thread
here with some more in-detail information about how the httpd project is
set up on comments.apache.org, and what will happen if the vote passes
tonight:
=
Options that are enabled:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I'd like to propose an Apache httpd 2.4.3 release RSN... I'll RM.
FYI I'd like for this backport to make the cut if anyone can review /
Jim can wait since it's frustrating for users to debug.
* core: AllowOverride
About 4 months ago we moved Paul's event optimization stuff
to its own branch, and since then no work as been done on it
at all...
I'd like for us to consider putting it back into trunk, so we
can work out the bugs and issues and getting it up to snuff.
This is in conjunction with my effort to
I don't know of any issues with 308, and Julian generally knows what
he is doing with regard to HTTP. In general, we should consider
the IANA registry to be authoritative unless it is a known bug,
which means we should support everything in
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
About 4 months ago we moved Paul's event optimization stuff
to its own branch, and since then no work as been done on it
at all...
I'd like for us to consider putting it back into trunk, so we
can work out the bugs and issues and getting it up to snuff.
The votes are in:
+1: 9 (humbedooh, joes, issac, rpluem, druggeri, rjung, lgentis,
sfritsch, rbowen)
0: 0
-1: 1 (mads)
As this is a majority vote issue, the vote has passed and the
integration of comments.a.o into the 2.2 and 2.4 branches will begin
tomorrow (that is, 2.4 will start tomorrow,
10 matches
Mail list logo
