On May 28, 2015 8:38 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:32 AM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com
wrote:
I think I would have preferred Jeff's form of the vote, which would
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 3:45 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
On May 27, 2015 9:46 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On 05/28/2015 03:54 PM, Jim Riggs wrote:
On 28 May 2015, at 14:30, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 28.05.2015 um 21:22 schrieb Rich Bowen:
On 05/27/2015 05:38 PM, olli hauer wrote:
- for long time there was no working mod_php module for 2.4, and
changing to
php-fpm was not
More data points and history to ponder, with placeholders to reflect the
passage of time;
1998-06-06 Initial 1.3.0 Release
1999-03-24 Stable 1.3.6 Release (last major MMN bump)
2000
2001
2002-04-05 Initial 2.0.35 Release
2002-09-24 Stable 2.0.42 Release (last major MMN bump)
2003
2004
2005-12-01
Am 28.05.2015 um 21:22 schrieb Rich Bowen:
On 05/27/2015 05:38 PM, olli hauer wrote:
- for long time there was no working mod_php module for 2.4, and
changing to
php-fpm was not for everyone a solution.
In my experience, the only reason that php-fpm wasn't a solution for
everyone is that
On 05/27/2015 05:38 PM, olli hauer wrote:
- for long time there was no working mod_php module for 2.4, and changing to
php-fpm was not for everyone a solution.
In my experience, the only reason that php-fpm wasn't a solution for
everyone is that it was poorly documented. We could still
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Andy Wang aw...@ptc.com wrote:
On 05/27/2015 11:33 AM, Mario Brandt wrote:
...
mario@sasuke:~$ readelf -s /usr/lib/libssl.so | grep SSL_CONF_CTX_finish
532: 000536f0 6 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 11
SSL_CONF_CTX_finish
327: 000536f0
On 28 May 2015, at 14:30, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 28.05.2015 um 21:22 schrieb Rich Bowen:
On 05/27/2015 05:38 PM, olli hauer wrote:
- for long time there was no working mod_php module for 2.4, and
changing to
php-fpm was not for everyone a solution.
In my
On May 27, 2015 9:46 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Anyone else think it's time to EOL 2.2 and focus
on 2.4 and the next gen? My thoughts
Mageia:
Mageia 3 released with Apahe 2.4 in April 2013
Apache 2.2 (via Mageia 2) reached EOL in November 2013
On 28/05/2015 17:59, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On 28/05/2015 14:48, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
Enough of this ad-hominem BS... [...]
You've lost the argument and lost respect, you have demonstrated that by
On May 28, 2015 5:31 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Why just 2 options and why *these* 2?
The VOTE is worthless and obviously designed to stop discussion.
I am not voting.
By all means then, don't.
To answer your question, these are the only two directions the project has
taken
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:41 PM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
Ubuntu - 14.04 LTS, and Debian 8 (Jessie) got the message, a year ago
April.
RHEL / CentOS 7 aren't even a year old yet.
OpenSUSE 13.1 beat them all to the punch, back in Nov of '13. So that's
the oldest
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:44 AM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Choose one;
[ ] EOL the 2.2.x branch effective 5/31/16; strictly security releases to
that date
[X] Defer a 2.2.x EOL decision for 6 months and re-consider this proposal in
Nov, '15.
I think I would have preferred
On 28/05/2015 14:48, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
Enough of this ad-hominem BS... this is in fact a majority rule decision (it
is a vote
not on code but on procedure), and is binding on the project as a whole. I
don't
want to discuss this again for six months and I'm not keen on the smug
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:48 AM, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On 28/05/2015 14:48, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
Enough of this ad-hominem BS... [...]
You've lost the argument and lost respect, you have demonstrated that by
this pathetic and childish response. Just because others
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
I think I would have preferred Jeff's form of the vote, which would
have allowed us to know the potential operating forces on 2.2.x.
We determined from that poll that there were 3 committers who
would fix bugs on 2.2,
Why just 2 options and why *these* 2?
The VOTE is worthless and obviously designed to stop discussion.
I am not voting.
On May 28, 2015, at 12:44 AM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Choose one;
[ ] EOL the 2.2.x branch effective 5/31/16; strictly security releases to
that
Nice!
On May 28, 2015, at 9:43 AM, Stefan Eissing stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de
wrote:
For anyone interested in mod_h2 internals, its parasitic life inside httpd
and the apache mutations (=hacks) it is doing, there is now a web page for
that:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:32 AM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
I think I would have preferred Jeff's form of the vote, which would
have allowed us to know the potential operating forces on 2.2.x.
We
One thing I've been thinking about, and there might even be some hooks
in trunk for it, is the idea of slave connections (or sub-connections)
which kind of *is* a pseudo connection. So one could create a connection
and then a sub/slave connection from that, and then use *that* for
requests. This
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 22:42 +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Not wanting to boast, but maybe mod_h2 for httpd 2.4 can play a role in
motivating people to migrate away from 2.2.
I've just looked at your internals page (which seems to me
an excellent piece of work), and it tends to support the gut
For anyone interested in mod_h2 internals, its parasitic life inside httpd and
the apache mutations (=hacks) it is doing, there is now a web page for that:
https://icing.github.io/mod_h2/internals.html. For people knowledgable in httpd
core APIs (and where else would one find them but here), I
On 28 May 2015, at 16:25, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
One thing I've been thinking about, and there might even be some hooks
in trunk for it, is the idea of slave connections (or sub-connections)
which kind of *is* a pseudo connection. So one could create a connection
and then a
On 28 May 2015, at 4:46 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
My thoughts are that we use mod_h2 as a guide to how to
better implement things in trunk, but also allow for
mod_h2 to also work w/ 2.4 as well... So there will be
a 2.4 version of mod_h2 as well as a more significant
merging
That makes most sense to me as well.
Besides all the non-optimal things I discuss in the internals paper, the
numbers - of my very limited measurements - show that mod_h2 is slightly less
performant than plain httpd *if you only have a single request/connection at a
time*. If you have 2
please dont sent other mail
Arash.S
Sent from
〰〰
On May 28, 2015, at 3:46 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
My thoughts are that we use mod_h2 as a guide to how to
better implement things in trunk, but also allow for
mod_h2 to also work w/ 2.4 as well... So there will be
My thoughts are that we use mod_h2 as a guide to how to
better implement things in trunk, but also allow for
mod_h2 to also work w/ 2.4 as well... So there will be
a 2.4 version of mod_h2 as well as a more significant
merging of mod_h2/trunk/2.6/3.0.
On May 28, 2015, at 10:36 AM, Nick Kew
On May 28, 2015, at 10:51 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 28 May 2015, at 4:46 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
My thoughts are that we use mod_h2 as a guide to how to
better implement things in trunk, but also allow for
mod_h2 to also work w/ 2.4 as well... So
On May 26, 2015 10:31 AM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik di...@webweaving.org
wrote:
On 26 May 2015, at 17:22, Dirk-Willem van Gulik di...@webweaving.org
wrote:
..
So I think that what is needed are two (or three) functions
...
- A string comparison function; where at least one string is is
I propose we - where possible - add the missing bits that mod_h2 has to
hack around, and then propose those changes for backport to v2.4 in the
normal way.
Given the amount of inertia minor versions of httpd have, it would be
ideal if mod_h2 could be used in the httpd v2.4 timeframe, rather
On 28 May 2015, at 17:03, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On May 26, 2015 10:31 AM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik di...@webweaving.org
mailto:di...@webweaving.org wrote:
On 26 May 2015, at 17:22, Dirk-Willem van Gulik di...@webweaving.org
mailto:di...@webweaving.org wrote:
On 28 May 2015, at 17:24, Dirk-Willem van Gulik di...@webweaving.org wrote:
On 28 May 2015, at 17:03, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net
mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On May 26, 2015 10:31 AM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik di...@webweaving.org
mailto:di...@webweaving.org wrote:
33 matches
Mail list logo
