Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.1-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
±1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha
Vote closes at 7:00 UTC on Thursday January 8 2009.
Thanks,
Paul
Paul Querna wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.1-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Your votes please;
±1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.0 as Alpha
This should actually be Release httpd-2.3.1 as Alpha, but I
fail at editing copied text.
I hope everyone
Rainer Jung wrote:
During testing 2.3.1 I noticed a lot of errors of type EMFILE: Too many
open files. I used strace and the problem looks like this:
- The test case is using ab with HTTP keep alive, concurrency 20 and a
small file, so doing about 2000 requests per second.
Vote closed with one -1, and no other votes.
I guess 2.3.1 was DOA.
I think the issues that killed it have been fixed in trunk. Thoughts on
starting 2.3.2 early next week?
-Paul
Paul Querna wrote:
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.1-alpha are available at:
http://httpd.apache.org
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
rts wrote:
how long will version 2.0 be available for use? Always? or until a certain
date generally speaking?
Forever. It's open source, if it's broke, you get to keep both pieces
(and fix them if you like). If you see http://archives.apache.org/
the foundation
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/22/2009 10:47 PM, pque...@apache.org wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Thu Jan 22 13:47:16 2009
New Revision: 736809
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=736809view=rev
Log:
Use the more traditional create/clear/destroy style for the main loop pool.
Suggested by:
Ryan Phillips wrote:
Thanks for the tips. IN6_IS_ADDR_V4MAPPED is defined in netinet/in.h on
unices and APR defines it on windows. I've modified the patch to check for
APR_HAVE_IPV6 support and check for APR_HAVE_NETINET_IN_H. Also, this patch will
apply to trunk/.
needs docs, but committed
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Jan 30, 2009, at 3:30 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Jan 30, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 01/30/2009 03:48 AM, field...@apache.org wrote:
+AP_DECLARE(int) ap_unixd_setup_child(void); /* mod_cgid needs this */
+
Hm. This break compilation of trunk as
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I would like to commit this module to trunk.
It's a watchdog module that creates a worker threads
either in parent, child via an API, and it's not for
standalone use, but for other module usage like
mod_heartbeat, probably mod_jk and others that need
maintenance threads.
Nick Kew wrote:
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 10:38:44 -0800
Paul Querna c...@force-elite.com wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
I would like to commit this module to trunk.
Tending to +1 in principle, subject to think-time.
For example heartbeat would be by an order of magnitude
simpler (I took some
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org
mailto:mt...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I would like to commit this module to trunk.
It's a watchdog module that creates a worker threads
either in parent, child via an API, and it's not for
n...@apache.org wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Tue Dec 30 18:27:24 2008
New Revision: 730296
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=730296view=rev
Log:
Add support for escaping all non-ascii chars to ap_escape_html, and use
it to fix PR#25202: encoding=entity doesn't work as advertised in
mod_include.
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Brian McCallister wrote:
So, in mod_lua I need to get the apr pool associated with the current
thread (that being the main thread if in prefork).
Paul suggested that this is not possible, presently, and suggested
adding a current_thread field to the request_rec, which
Graham Leggett wrote:
Brian McCallister wrote:
So, in mod_lua I need to get the apr pool associated with the current
thread (that being the main thread if in prefork).
What about the process_rec structure?
In other words, r-server-process-pool?
(Not sure if this is what you are
Brian McCallister wrote:
An alternative, for my need, is to be able to add a cleanup hook to
the current thread. I can then just create a pool and put it in a
thread local (you can do that with just the os thread in apr). I
cannot find a way to actually register a cleanup for the threadlocal
Brian McCallister wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Paul Querna c...@force-elite.com wrote:
I think doing it via the mpm/extending the request rec is the right way
to do it, and I don't understand why there is resistance to just doing
it that way?
I don't think there is resistance
Brian McCallister wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Paul Querna c...@force-elite.com wrote:
r742218 adds conn_rec::current_thread, and implements support for it on
all the common Unix MPMs.
It turns out its
Brian McCallister wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org wrote:
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Paul Querna c...@force-elite.com wrote:
r742218 adds conn_rec::current_thread, and implements support for it on
all the common Unix MPMs.
It turns out its
i'm somewhat involved with libjsox:
http://code.google.com/p/libjsox/
Matthew Rushton wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with using any of the C JSON libraries
to encode json in responses? It looks like there are several options, I
just wanted to know what people are using if anything?
Bertrand Mansion wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Bertrand Mansion bmans...@mamasam.net
wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering why support of libapreq2 was removed from mod_lua?
The way mod_lua currently deals with cookies, querystring and POST
data is not very robust nor complete.
Actually
Brian McCallister wrote:
Brian, Bertrand, and others are using (variations on in many cases)
mod_wombat right now, pulling it into trunk is good in the long term,
but it leaves some folks hanging.
I'm thinking we should maintain the mod_wombat tree as an external
backport to 2.2. It can use
Brian Akins wrote:
On 2/25/09 11:23 AM, Brian McCallister bri...@skife.org wrote:
It can use Brian's thread scope approach (thugh I
actually want to change it to add the pool still, and backport all the
rest of the trunk changes),
I was thinking about this, and I think having direct access
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:35 AM, SAMEER KUMAR
sameer.kasi2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi to all,
We are working on hybrid architecture of OpenSIP Server. It already has a
Multiprocessing architecture. We would like to extend it to have hybrid
architecture like apache 2.0. Any advice or help or
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:51 AM, rpl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rpluem
Date: Mon Mar 23 10:51:00 2009
New Revision: 757373
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=757373view=rev
Log:
* If the SNI extension supplied
i intend to roll 2.3.2 alpha this evening in Amsterdam.
most likely about 5pm.
get your patches in :)
thanks,
paul
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:51 AM, rpl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rpluem
Date: Mon Mar 23 10:51:00 2009
New Revision: 757373
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=757373view=rev
Log:
* If the SNI extension supplied a hostname. So don't accept requests with
either no hostname or a
Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.2-alpha are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~pquerna/dev/httpd-2.3.2/
Your votes please;
±1
[ ] Release httpd-2.3.2 as Alpha
Vote closes at 18:00 UTC on Friday March 27 2009.
Thanks,
Paul
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org
mailto:mt...@apache.org wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
(no plans here to touch WinNT MPMs, and I don't see any
compelling
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote:
We should axe
leader
perchild
threadpool
immediately in trunk as IMHO they are not maintained for years.
I am not quite sure how much care the platform specific MPMs for OS2 and
BEOS get. Novell seems to be still
As much as i would like to use simple, I don't think its quite ready
yet (time/patches welcome!).
I think the default should be event for the time being.
2009/3/26 j...@apache.org:
Author: jim
Date: Thu Mar 26 11:09:33 2009
New Revision: 758597
URL:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik
di...@webweaving.org wrote:
Folks,
Am I right in looking at (trunk, 2.2):
file: http_filters.c
function basic_http_header
if (proxy)
else {
date = apr_palloc(r-pool, APR_RFC822_DATE_LEN);
I've updated mod_serf.
It now does:
- Fully Async Proxying when running on the Event MPM
- Dynamic Clustered Backends based on machines with mod_heartbeat running.
- New provider for providing a list of IPs to use, rather than the
mod_proxy interface of only working with known workers -- I
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote:
On 03/28/2009 12:10 AM, pque...@apache.org wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Fri Mar 27 23:10:21 2009
New Revision: 759386
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=759386view=rev
+static void *
The Problem: You just bought into whole cloud computing craze. But how do you
load balance to this constantly changing fabric, without sysadmins
constantly changing
server configurations. Most generic cloud computing platforms , for
example Amazon EC2,
provide almost no way of load balancing
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The (vaporware) solution: mod_cloudbeat automatically finds all of your
nodes,
both front end load balancers and backend application servers. All load
balancing is completely configurationless
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 7:28 PM, ntwrkd ntw...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you explain why this would not be accomplishable through
mod_proxy_balancer and would merit it's own module?
1) it is not currently possibly to add proxy workers without a
graceful restart, meaning you either need to script or
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
no, this is just a utility module, which tells you where other members
are.
second, mod_backhand has never been ported to 2.x, and it does allow
you to autoconfigure on cloud-enviroments, which mostly
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:17 PM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Sun Mar 29 19:17:30 2009
New Revision: 759751
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=759751view=rev
Log:
Use child singleton watchdog for running the heartbeat module
Modified:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:17 PM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Sun Mar 29 19:17:30 2009
New Revision: 759751
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=759751view=rev
Log:
Use child
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:17 PM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Sun Mar 29 19:17:30 2009
New Revision: 759751
URL
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
Inside a MPM that does it natively, just use the registered list of
providers, and implement the same behavoirs as the module
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Mar 29, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
URL Authentication is done by computing an randomly seeded md5 signature
of:
seed + $+ MD5(seed + shared_secret + uri)
This is base64 encoded, and placed in a 'X
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Paul Querna
Gesendet: Montag, 30. März 2009 17:04
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [PROPOSAL] mod_cloudbeat
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Jim Jagielski
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Paul Querna
Gesendet: Montag, 30. März 2009 17:18
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [PROPOSAL] mod_cloudbeat
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Plüm
mod_watchdog is the latest offender in a series of modules that expose
additional functions to the API. (mod_proxy and mod_cache do too!)
What happened to all functions that are not inside server/* must be
either dynamic optional functions or hooks?
Doesn't anyone remember the load order pain of
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Preethi Natarajan preethi@gmail.com wrote:
Hello folks,
We are trying to adapt HTTP to work over SCTP streams
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-natarajan-http-over-sctp-01). Since this
proposal was received warmly at the httpbis WG, we are contemplating on
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:01 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
How to solve?
I don't know. This is why I write this mail :-).
We eliminate internal_fast_redirect ;-)
hell yeah, I would love to eliminate internal redirects completely.
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:45 AM, IT_Architect
jack.toer...@leadingedgeita.com wrote:
Takashi Sato-5 wrote:
Event MPM has been Experimental for a long time.
Is there any plan to mark as Productional MPM?
Or any plan to drop it like Leader, Threadpool or Perchild?
There are a lot of people
Then the docs are outdated
On May 4, 2009, at 12:09 PM, IT_Architect
jack.toer...@leadingedgeita.com wrote:
Paul Querna-6 wrote:
it does work with mod_ssl now. AFAIK it does work with mod_rewrite
too,
unless there is some issue I don't know about.That would be great
news.
The docs
Hi,
There is lots of discussion about fixing mod_proxy and
mod_proxy_balancer, to try to make it do things that the APIs are just
broken for, and right now, it seems from the outside to be turning
into a ball of mud.
I think the right way to frame the discussion is, how should the API
optimally
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On May 6, 2009, at 2:26 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Hi,
I think the right way to frame the discussion is, how should the API
optimally be structured -- then change the existing one to be closer
to it, rather than the barrage
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On May 6, 2009, at 2:53 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Stop worrying about 2.2, and just focus on doing it right -- then ship
2.4 in 3-4 months imo, trunk really isn't that far off from being a
decent 2.4, it just needs some
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 3:50 AM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Hi,
There is lots of discussion about fixing mod_proxy and
mod_proxy_balancer, to try to make it do things that the APIs are just
broken for, and right now, it seems from the outside
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Rick van der Zwet
i...@rickvanderzwet.nl wrote:
When a ampersand '' is included into the message header, it is not
escaped properly causing an XML validation error.
It currently using URI_ESCAPE_OR_BLANK, but I Message-Id is not of URI
type, actually
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 1:49 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 05/08/2009 07:09 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
--enable-mods-shared=all \
And what is/was your last httpd -l
Compiled in modules:
core.c
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
Does anyone have anything special that they would like me to
pass on to the ASF board? I could request a budget for our
thousand-open-bugs-bash party.
an httpd party would be cool. it would be nice to crush some of our
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:56 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Fri May 22 12:49:41 2009
New Revision: 777499
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=777499view=rev
Log:
No need (that I can see) to have the -FTP suffix here
-1
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Andreas Krennmaira...@synflood.at wrote:
Hello everyone,
.
The basic principle is that the timeout for new connections is adjusted
according to the current load on the Apache instance: a load percentage is
computed in the perform_idle_server_maintenance()
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Graham
Dumpletongraham.dumple...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/23 Weibin Yao nbubi...@gmail.com:
William A. Rowe, Jr. at 2009-6-23 2:00 wrote:
Andreas Krennmair wrote:
* Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org [2009-06-22 04:30]:
wouldnt limiting the number of
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 5:35 AM, jean-frederic clerejfcl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I plan to use slotmem (additionally to the actual file based logic) in the
heartbeat logic.
HeartbeatStorage mem:logs/hb.dat (slotmem and key/save uses logs/hb.dat).
HeartbeatStorage logs/hb.dat (existing
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:01 AM, n...@apache.org wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Wed Jul 1 15:01:55 2009
New Revision: 790205
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=790205view=rev
Log:
mod_noloris just moved from discussion to attracting its first patch
on d...@. That means it wants to be in svn.
Can't sleep, so finally writing this email I've been meaning to write
for about 7 months now :D
One of the challenges in the Simple MPM, and to a smaller degree in
the Event MPM, is how to manage memory allocation, destruction, and
thread safety.
A 'simple' example:
- 1) Thread A: Client
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Justin Erenkrantzjus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Paul Quernap...@querna.org wrote:
I am looking for an alternative that doesn't expose all this crazyness
of when to free, destruct, or lock things. The best idea I can come
up with
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Mladen Turkmt...@apache.org wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Can't sleep, so finally writing this email I've been meaning to write
for about 7 months now :D
Pools don't help, but don't really make it worse, and are good enough
for the actual cleanup part
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:34 AM, Graham Leggettminf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
I think it is possible to write a complete server that deals with all
these intricacies and gets everything just 'right', but as soon as you
introduce 3rd party module writers, no matter how 'smart' we
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Graham Leggettminf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Nah, 90% of what is done in moduels today should be out of process aka
in FastCGI or another method, but out of process. (regardless of
MPM)
You're just moving the problem from one server to another
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Graham Leggettminf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Yes, but in a separate process it has fault isolation.. and we can
restart it when it fails, neither of which are true for modules using
the in-process API directly -- look at the reliability of QMail
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Akins, Brianbrian.ak...@turner.com wrote:
This is how I envisioned the async stuff working.
-Async event thread is used only for input/output of httpd to/from network*
-After we read the headers, we pass the request/connection to the worker
threads. Each
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Graham
Dumpletongraham.dumple...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/8 Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm:
Paul Querna wrote:
It breaks the 1:1: connection mapping to thread (or process) model
which is critical to low memory footprint, with thousands of
connections, maybe
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Bojan Smojverbo...@rexursive.com wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 11:01 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
So, the loop would be:
- poll()
- try assembling a full request from data read so far
- process if successful
- go back to poll() if not
Too naive?
I see
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Noah Slaternsla...@apache.org wrote:
Hey,
I just sent the following email to the CouchDB developer list:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/200907.mbox/20090722214200.ga11...@tumbolia.org
Preparing these emails is such a chore, I thought
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Jim Jagielskij...@jagunet.com wrote:
All looks good! Plenty of both binding and non-binding
+1s and not a -1 to be found.
I will start the process of releasing 2.2.12!
I have upgraded www.apache.org to 2.2.12, yell if you see anything odd :)
Thanks,
Paul
-1 veto, please revert this commit.
Unless I missed something, these changes were not voted on in the
STATUS file. I think wrowe's endorsement was... badly worded.
Thanks,
Paul
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 7:08 PM, fua...@apache.org wrote:
Author: fuankg
Date: Tue Jul 28 02:08:32 2009
New
ugh, looks like dan never actually added himself to the XML -- only to
the HTML. Will fix this in a few.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
Hi Paul,
I guess you didn't want to delete Dan from the contributors list ;)
Regards,
Rainer
On 30.07.2009
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:37 AM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Thu Jul 30 15:37:22 2009
New Revision: 799334
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=799334view=rev
Log:
Add the file logic for the handler.
(Next step add the slotmem logic for the multicast socket).
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 8:58 PM, tim robertsontim...@email.com wrote:
Apache HTTP Server should be Event-driven by default, instead of using
Processes/Threads. Alot of other http web servers are outperforming Apache
because they use Events because this reduces cpu and memory usage. Events
will
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:47 AM, William A. Rowe,
Jr.wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
I think we blew it :)
Vary: user-agent is not practical for correcting errant browser behavior.
For example;
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 Gecko/20090729 Firefox/3.5.2
produces a myriad number of 'variant' flavors
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:50 PM, William A. Rowe,
Jr.wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Yes, write a Varied header to 'hash' plugin API for mod_cache.
I would write little lua scriptlets that map user agents to two
buckets: supports gzip, doesnt support gzip. store the thing
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Jim Jagielskij...@jagunet.com wrote:
If compiling, at least for now, make sure you use CC='gcc -arch i386'
(or use gcc-4.0)... APR won't build under both archs and the default
for gcc-4.2 is to build for x86_64, which makes APR barf.
did anyone ask friends at
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Jim Jagielskij...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Aug 31, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Jim Jagielskij...@jagunet.com wrote:
If compiling, at least for now, make sure you use CC='gcc -arch i386'
(or use gcc-4.0)... APR won't
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Akins, Brianbrian.ak...@turner.com wrote:
Also, could just make external process use HTTP.
I'm seeing the idea of this pattern show up in lots of places.
It'd be nice to actually get an open source module that did it.
somewhere
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 12.09.2009 01:44, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.09.2009 23:40, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
In r814006 and r814017 I added a feature similar to Action ... virtual
in CGI to mod_fcgi:
By default it is
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote:
On 09/14/2009 07:32 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
But your patch is causing core dumps during the proxy tests when
running the test suite :-(.
I currently don't understand why.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:58 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Dan Poirier wrote:
I'd like to log the server command line and server root at startup.
The reason is: sometimes when debugging a problem I'm given some logs
and a directory full of various revisions of the
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:22 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:53 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
How soon do we want another tarball with the whole flurry of fixes
committed to mod_fcgid already?
I'd like to see another beta
Hi,
I spoke a little too soon, there is one problem.
mod_fcgid correctly uses the VirtualHost as one of the unique inputs
for each backend daemon.
(Sidenote: This virtualhost code is *only* present in the unix process
manager, which means there is a separate bug/issue in the win32
process
very likely, mod_serf in its current for should just be polished to
replace mod_proxy_*, and all of the async stuff should be pushed
towards the MPMs..
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
mod_serf uses in line 102:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
At least regarding the perl test framework, Event is the fastest MPM
for OS X (compared to worker and prefork).
Interesting :)
yes, because it doesn't use the accept mutex. If you modify the
worker mpm to also not use the
Unless there are any objections, i intend to convert httpd.apache.org
later tonight.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Hi all,
Does httpd want to volunteer for this?
Regards,
Graham
--
Hi,
apr.apache.org is now managed by SvnPubSub.
I think we are
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Oct 2, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
At least regarding the perl test framework, Event is the fastest MPM
for OS X (compared to worker
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Philip A. Prindeville
philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
Hi.
I haven't contributed to Apache in about 10 years, so it's been a while
since I've stared at the source.
I did, however, recently pull down the 2.2.13 tarball and did:
[phil...@builder
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Does anybody know the current status of the syncing effort? (other than
the fact that we aren't synced yet ;) )
I saw commits from Paul yesterday but didn't understand the big picture.
Okay, its done for the first round.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/site/trunk/docs
maps 'live' within a few seconds to
http://httpd.apache.org/
if you want to try it out, edit docs/test.txt, and you can see it show up here:
http://httpd.apache.org/test.txt pretty quickly.
This does not
to the rest of our mirror
network.
thanks,
paul
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
Okay, its done for the first round.
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/site/trunk/docs
maps 'live' within a few seconds to
http://httpd.apache.org/
if you want to try it out, edit
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:26 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Yesterday I had fixed /dist/httpd, but not ../win32/binaries. These have
also now
shown up. Looks like we are (belatedly) in good shape, even netware appears
to be
out there now.
all the files are now
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Paul,
Paul Querna schrieb:
all the files are now sourced from svn:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/httpd/
woah, so that means all files are now to be commited to SVN?
And that's not an issue on the long term
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Roy T. Fielding field...@gbiv.com wrote:
On Oct 3, 2009, at 7:36 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Paul,
Paul Querna schrieb:
all the files are now sourced from svn
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 1:08 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Sun Oct 4 08:08:50 2009
New Revision: 821477
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=821477view=rev
Log:
Make sure to not destroy bucket brigades that have been created by earlier
filters. Otherwise the pool cleanups
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Oct 4, 2009, at 2:21 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
If we are serious about trying to get a 2.4 out this year,
what do people say about branching off trunk at this point,
so we could focus on
Heya,
A friend of mine is helping organizing the first C Conf:
http://www.cconf.org/
I think it could be a very interesting conference for those of us that
still enjoy coding C :-)
I think it would be great if we could get a few talks submitted about
APR and HTTPD too, two projects with a
701 - 800 of 928 matches
Mail list logo
