On 24.09.2009 23:11, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
here's based on input from Rainer and Rüdiger my last trial unless I get
further positive comments instead of disappointing ones ...
highlighted:
http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/testchecksum/testchecksums.sh.html
plaintext:
On 29.09.2009 13:25, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org
mailto:fua...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
Jie Gao schrieb:
/usr/local/src/httpd-2.2.14/srclib/apr/libtool --silent
--mode=compile /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -g -fast
On 06.10.2009 14:56, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:07 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
traw...@apache.org mailto:traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Mon Oct 5 23:58:34 2009
New Revision: 822094
On 29.09.2009 05:28, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[ ] -1 for any release of 0.9.6 (regressed from 0.9.2 or earlier?)
[ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6-beta
[ ] +1 to release as 0.9.6 GA
Exactly like Jeff:
+1 for beta
+ 0.5 for GA (I don't know enough about it to be more sure)
This time I
On 06.10.2009 18:26, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
On 06.10.2009 14:56, Jeff Trawick wrote:
(hoping that includes building on Windows to see the more obvious
Jeff-breakage :( )
Neither obvious nor non-obvious: I tried building on Windows right now
(against 2.2.14
On 06.10.2009 18:47, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Note concerning the Windows build files: I did a neu erstellen, should
be something like cleanbuild. As a result for mod_ftp I did not get
.pdb files. They were only produced for mod_ftp_example.
Digging into it a little
On 06.10.2009 20:11, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Both Makefiles check against httpd.vcproj in the main directory which is
not present when building out of tree.
Now I see what you mean, both for .vcproj and .mak tests, something like the
last
commit, right?
Yes, I missed the .mak one.
On 06.10.2009 21:22, Jeff Trawick wrote:
mich...@x054:[/data/prj/http-2.2.14.bad/srclib/apr/build]grep -c aix
*.m4 | grep -v :0
apr_hints.m4:5
libtool.m4:53
ltdl.m4:2
Most of these are in the form:
aix[[4-9]]*)
I saw a few aix5 ones, no aix6 specific
On 06.10.2009 22:31, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Another thing is being able to split INSTDIR from APACHE2_HOME. The
first is where the module should go to, the other one where httpd is. A
simple tweak to the Makefile allows that. Then there's also an
unconditional
On 06.10.2009 20:01, Michael Felt wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to get a build made on AIX 6.1. And I suspect the problem I
am having is the root cause of the problems people are reporting
regarding can't make .so files when using AIX 6.1 (p.s. the quick fix is
to compile on AIX 5.3, it
On 09.10.2009 00:39, Michael Felt wrote:
In case the question is not obvious - why is the code not finding it's
own expat.h file? Is it not suppossed to - meaning install the expat
package?
Yes, it should.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com
On 09.10.2009 20:55, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Related to clarifying the executable part of the wrapper command-line
(823657): Handling wrapper executables with embedded blanks,
especially to confront the FcgiWrapper C:/PROGRA~1/PHP/php-cgi.exe
.php meme. (Dig the quotes; you might anticipate you
On 22.11.2011 22:42, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
[core:error] [pid 3800:tid 2216] [client 220.134.192.77:42107]
Handler for type-map returned invalid result code 620018, referer:
.
This message denotes that there is a bug in the handler (maybe in
mod_negotiation). The log message itself is new,
On 23.11.2011 15:23, Joe Orton wrote:
Prutha Parikh from Qualys reported a variant on the CVE-2011-3368 attack
against certain mod_proxy/mod_rewrite configurations. A new CVE name,
CVE-2011-4317, has been assigned to this variant.
The configurations in question are the same as affected by
On 27.11.2011 10:50, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
docs/icons/apache_pb2* contain the version number (2.2), in the case
of docs/icons/apache_pb2_ani.gif it's even an animation.
Any volunteers for changing these to 2.4?
Anyone knows the right or at least a similar font?
Regards,
Rainer
Hi Gregg,
In 28.11.2011 01:12, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
I did this a couple weeks ago, it's close, but not perfect. Best on
white/light background.
Which font did you use for the digits? Is it a freely avaiable font?
Regards,
Rainer
On 29.11.2011 13:12, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 29 Nov 2011, at 11:55, Igor Galić wrote:
OpenSSL (and cascading deps to it)
mod_ssl
mod_session
mod_session_crypto
Neither mod_session nor mod_session_crypto have any hard coded links to openssl
(or any other library), it's all abstracted away.
On 30.11.2011 01:02, Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
While merging I am getting a lot of stray svn:mergeinfo changes on arbitrary
files, for example:
M modules/core/mod_watchdog.c
M modules/core/mod_so.c
M modules/core/Makefile.in
M modules/core/config.m4
M
On 04.12.2011 14:15, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 29.11.2011 13:12, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 29 Nov 2011, at 11:55, Igor Galić wrote:
OpenSSL (and cascading deps to it)
mod_ssl
mod_session
mod_session_crypto
Neither mod_session nor mod_session_crypto have any hard coded links
to openssl (or any
On 04.12.2011 15:38, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 1, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
@@ -551,7 +546,7 @@ static int scgi_handler(request_rec *r,
cleanup:
if (backend) {
backend-close = 1; /* always close the socket */
-
Picking up this old discussion:
On 03.07.2011 19:40, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 7/1/2011 12:26 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 07/01/2011 06:31 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Hi folks,
Well, this is the same chunk of Win32 specific debugging code causing this
module to
crash yet again.
Gregg: Can
Hi Bill,
On 05.12.2011 07:50, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 12/4/2011 6:08 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
-ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, rc, s,
+ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, rc, s, APLOGNO(00654)
Did you really mean for these to be in octal?
APLOGNO is the
-status for a long time for the
winnt MPM?
-Original Message- From: Rainer Jung
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 11:32 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Win 2.3.15 :: Server Status Entries
On 22.11.2011 10:28, Steffen wrote:
Seeing a huge number of hanging entries in the Server
On 30.12.2011 22:04, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/27/2011 10:40 AM, Steffen wrote:
Gregg reported it also:
I've also found AcceptFilter https none to be problematic. First time
you hit a site via https it usually comes up with a blank white
nothing. Hitting reload and it comes up proper.
On 04.01.2012 06:00, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/3/2012 9:19 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 30.12.2011 22:04, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/27/2011 10:40 AM, Steffen wrote:
Gregg reported it also:
I've also found AcceptFilter https none to be problematic. First time
you hit a site via https
: Rainer Jung
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 9:33 PM Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.devel
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Win 2.3.15 :: Server Status Entries
On 06.12.2011 11:56, Steffen wrote:
Those requests are no longer processed (status is _). The seconds
since is the time since
During the Build for Windows 32 Bit I get the following warnings:
mod_data.c(112): warning C4244: 'function' : conversion from 'apr_off_t'
to 'int', possible loss of data
mod_filter.c(596): warning C4090: 'function' : different 'const' qualifiers
mod_substitute.c(250): warning C4018: '=' :
Hi Eric,
On 04.01.2012 16:07, Eric Covener wrote:
Any fresh hints/pointers about setting up a windows sandbox so I can
try to look at the LDAP stuff?
Here's what I did. Some of it is a bit complex, because I used Visual
Studio 10 and the Windows build files are not really optimal for that
On 07.01.2012 20:22, Sander Temme wrote:
Folks,
I've put in some updates to the mod_heart* modules, taken from the README
supplied with the modules and some perusal of the source code. I have not run
these as I'm too lazy to set up the servers. Review would be appreciated,
especially by
On 12.01.2012 11:24, Steffen wrote:
We have at least 4 hard bugs in 2.3.16. Known for a long time, and no need to
exposure more for these.
Fine a GA, with a big note that it is not ready for Windows and advising to run
2.2.21 as proven stable.
So not happy with 2.4.
Understood, but we
On 12.01.2012 19:10, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On monday (Jan 16th), I plan to TR 2.4.0...
+1
On 13.01.2012 10:18, Steffen wrote:
Yep. I supplied logs when asked. And Stefan was asked to provide a trace log,
not me.
I know you provided some, but it was only LogLevel info and without any
timestamps. What would be very helpful in addition would be the full
trace8 log files of a good
On 16.01.2012 18:50, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.0 (prerelease) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.0 GA.
Vote will last the normal 72 hours... Can I get a w00t w00t!
Intermediate
On 19.01.2012 07:14, Kaspar Brand wrote:
On 19.01.2012 03:28, Rainer Jung wrote:
OpenSSL should be 1.0.0f and the strange thing is, that the same tests
succeed on Solaris 10 using the same OpenSSL version. Something must be
different between my Linux systems, which all fail, and the Solaris box
On 16.01.2012 18:50, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.0 (prerelease) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.0 GA.
Vote will last the normal 72 hours... Can I get a w00t w00t!
+1 for GA.
I
On 21.01.2012 15:38, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Sat Jan 21 14:38:25 2012
New Revision: 1234336
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1234336view=rev
Log:
Update copyrights for externally visible and changed code
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/include/ap_release.h
On 25.01.2012 23:59, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
(x86 binary distribution and -win32-src.zip) will follow shortly, once
I fix the release.sh breakage.
On 25.01.2012 23:59, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
(x86 binary distribution and -win32-src.zip) will follow shortly, once
I fix the release.sh breakage.
On 30.01.2012 03:16, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/29/2012 3:18 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Overview:
Minor problem (not a regression): config.guess and config.sub are a bit old
(2008) due to
buildconf in the released apr overwriting the config.* in our svn by the
system config.*. This is fixed
On 25.01.2012 14:00, Jeff Trawick wrote:
I'll start with the patch for CVE-2011-4317.
I removed CVE-2011-3348 from STATUS (does not apply to 2.0.x) and added
a comment for CVE-2010-2068, which IMHO does not apply either.
Regards,
Rainer
On 30.01.2012 19:10, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/30/2012 4:02 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
We add apu-1-confg --includes to CPPFLAGS and then use CPP and apu_version.h to
detect
which version we have. That works for most gcc versions, but recent gcc chokes,
because
apu_version.h includes
On 31.01.2012 00:36, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
On 1/30/2012 7:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone with Windows willing to sign up to review/test?
I don't have a build environment to create something based on the diff,
but if someone can create a build , I'll happily do the testing.
What's you
On 30.01.2012 22:53, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/30/2012 3:12 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
And there is apachectl, not httpdctl.
Would anyone else like to see this changed, now, for the 2.4 releases?
-0.5
Rainer
I backported some trunk changes to 2.4.x (mostly cosmetic ones) and a
few changes also in the other direction to keep code changes small in
parts were there are still no functional changes.
A few backports are open, because I'm not sure, whether we want to
backport. I left out the obvious
On 31.01.2012 16:17, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 31 Jan 2012, at 5:07 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
6) mod_cache
Applied to 2.4.x but not in trunk:
r1208384 | minfrin | 2011-11-30 12:21:43 +0100 (Wed, 30 Nov 2011) | 4 lines
mod_cache: Revert http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view
Hi Stefan,
On 29.01.2012 20:53, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more isolated,
rather than the current impl which is intrusive (which is
part of what we're trying to avoid, aren't we?)
OK, patch is attached.
On 31.01.2012 17:17, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 31 Jan 2012, at 5:43 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
All the items listed are actual code differences. The log info was the shortest
way to explain the differences. I tried hard to verify, that the differences
I've seen are actually the ones generatde
On 31.01.2012 17:38, Jim Jagielski wrote:
5) mod_authnz_ldap
==
r1231257 | covener | 2012-01-13 20:18:03 +0100 (Fri, 13 Jan 2012) | 3 lines
whitespace only: shift a block refactored in r1231255 over 8 spaces.
r1231255 | covener | 2012-01-13 20:16:50 +0100 (Fri, 13 Jan 2012) |
On 30.01.2012 21:11, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Do I dare float the idea of a 2.4.1 TR very soon??
I'm done with flodding the list with trivial backports.
Still open are:
A) Testing/Fixing the bucket problems. There were two bugs, and I have
lost the overview, how the fixes are related. One was
On 31.01.2012 22:23, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 31 January 2012, Rainer Jung wrote:
1) mod_reqtimeout
=
Now trunk is made consistent with 2.4.x (module is active with default
values if loaded but not explicitely configured). r1238826 (sf).
2) log tags
On 31.01.2012 22:50, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Tue Jan 31 21:50:03 2012
New Revision: 1238824
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1238824view=rev
Log:
Merge r1225199:
Check during configtest that the directories for error logs exist
PR: 29941
I added r1238833:
Fix handling
On 31.01.2012 22:30, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 31 January 2012, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 1/29/2012 11:53 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over the code, impl as a hook seems more isolated,
rather than the current impl which is intrusive
On 02.02.2012 15:54, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm calling a vote to get consensus on whether we should continue
to bundle apr/apu with httpd 2.4.x.
The proposal is that at the time we TR 2.4.x, we also bundle
that latest, released versions of apr/apu with the httpd tarball.
How we bundle it (eg:
On 02.02.2012 23:48, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/2/2012 4:18 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hmmm, no clear consensus until now.
Consensus? Looks pretty split so far :) Or do you mean you had
no clear opinion until now?
Did I say no consensus? I do have a clear opinion as everyone else
seems
On 03.02.2012 19:51, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 2/3/2012 9:35 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/3/2012 2:22 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
Since I have been the most vocal about this
watchdog/hearmonitor/heartbeats on windows ...
I should chime in.
I can tell someone what each do (as far as I have
Hi Graham,
On 20.12.2011 15:53, minf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: minfrin
Date: Tue Dec 20 14:53:13 2011
New Revision: 1221296
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1221296view=rev
Log:
Move ab, logresolve, httxt2dbm and apxs to bin from sbin, along with
corresponding man pages.
Since the
Hi Andre,
nice fix. One remark see below.
On 10.02.2012 22:53, n...@apache.org wrote:
Author: nd
Date: Fri Feb 10 21:53:19 2012
New Revision: 1242950
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1242950view=rev
Log:
enter manpage section assignment into property file
Modified:
I just notived the following sentence on our front page:
Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since
April 1996, and celebrated its 15th birthday as a project this February.
Since we now have february 2012, this is no longer our 15 birthday. IMHO
we should remove
Hi Lucien,
On 12.02.2012 17:08, lgen...@apache.org wrote:
Author: lgentis
Date: Sun Feb 12 16:08:31 2012
New Revision: 1243272
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1243272view=rev
Log:
Updates.
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml.fr
Lame mathematician joke: 2.4 at 2^4 (16th Apache birthday).
Regards,
Rainer
On 13.02.2012 14:56, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
easier for the
On 13.02.2012 14:56, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
easier for the
On 21.02.2012 09:44, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Tue Feb 21 08:44:06 2012
New Revision: 503
Modified:
dev/httpd/Announcement2.4.html
dev/httpd/Announcement2.4.txt
Modified: dev/httpd/Announcement2.4.html
Hi Infra,
I know there's always to much to do, but any chance we can update
www.apache.org to 2.4.1 now that 2.4 is GA?
AFAIK Joe's latest problem observation with 2.3.16 was fixed in
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1236351view=rev
before cutting 2.4.1.
Thanks in advance should you find
Looking at the server status on www.apache.org running 2.3.15 one can
see, that about 50% of the async connections are in closing state.
We created AsyncRequestWorkerFactor to control the amount of
overcommitment in terms of connections relative to idle workers we allow
for each process. The
On 22.02.2012 09:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote on Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 04:53:34 +0100:
C only occasionally, not with such a big percentage. E.g. on the
EU mirror running 2.2 and having less traffic there is hardly ever a
C to notice. Is that an expected 2.4/event difference
On 23.02.2012 15:19, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748
Bug #: 52748
Summary: build should blow up early with apr 1.3 or earlier?
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.1
Platform: PC
Currently server-status at w.a.o shows 4 processes with no busy requests
but all slots in state G or L and many connections in closing. It
seems the reason for those processes to not end are the closing
connections, but if it were correct lingering close, that would have
ended long ago. The
On 24.02.2012 12:12, Steffen wrote:
Looks like the hanging L's, which I reported way back, which was
investigated by Stefan
Could be but not necessarily. It depends on your MaxConnectionsPerChild
setting. The situation at w.a.o is due to processes getting recycled. I
sporadically watched the
On 26.02.2012 00:00, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi someone with bugzilla admin rights,
please add the following modules as components to bugzilla:
mod_policy
mod_firehose
mod_proxy_html
mod_xml2enc
mod_log_debug
mod_data
Done
Hopefully I haven't overlooked anything.
I also added mod_serf and
On 26.02.2012 17:46, Sander Temme wrote:
On Feb 24, 2012, at 3:50 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 24.02.2012 12:12, Steffen wrote:
Looks like the hanging L's, which I reported way back, which was
investigated by Stefan
Could be but not necessarily. It depends on your MaxConnectionsPerChild
On 26.02.2012 19:11, Steffen wrote:
When I recall on the list is stated that .dsw and .dsp files cannot
directly be used by VC10, so we should drop them.
Correct me if I have read/understood wrong.
But in the MS docu I read:
By using Visual C++ 2010, you can open and save a project that was
On 27.02.2012 23:14, Michael Felt wrote:
LoadModule unixd_module libexec/mod_unixd.so
#LoadModule heartbeat_module libexec/mod_heartbeat.so
#LoadModule heartmonitor_module libexec/mod_heartmonitor.so
#LoadModule dav_module libexec/mod_dav.so
LoadModule status_module libexec/mod_status.so
On 02.03.2012 11:44, Michael Felt wrote:
Well, as long as I dont need a compiler (as I dont have one installed
here, dont want test to be dependent on compiler, or dev related files
not normally found on production system) this wont be a problem - I will
just install the packages and then
On 03.03.2012 15:22, Eric Covener wrote:
But it would have to be clear that inclusion into trunk would not by
default mean that they would be included in the next major release.
Especially for mod_ftp, I think that it requires many more eyeballs
and a comprehensive test suite before it should
On 01.03.2012 19:11, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Let's simply reset this whole mess.
A proposal to adopt mod_firehose is attached.
[X] Option 1: adopt as trunk module
[ ] Option 2: adopt only as subproject
[ ] Option 3: do not adopt
Option 1.
Regards,
Rainer
On 02.03.2012 19:28, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
A proposal to adopt mod_policy is attached.
[X] Option 1: adopt as trunk module
[ ] Option 2: adopt only as subproject
[ ] Option 3: do not adopt
+1 for Option 1.
Regards,
Rainer
On 06.03.2012 09:25, Massimo Manghi wrote:
I'm quite aware the code is public, but I thought it would be highly
recommended to rely on interfaces rather than copying pasting
implementations that might change in future.
Days ago I put on this list a question (that went unanswered) concerning
On 06.03.2012 15:53, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com wrote:
Sounds reasonable.
BTW, I started sketching out a RuntimeDir directive and
ap_runtime_dir_relative() API. (i.e., I threw some code together but
I don't have
hi Jim,
On 07.03.2012 00:24, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Oh yeah... and how do we worry about keeping things in sync. For
example, right now trunk uses 02298 and 02299, but 2.4 does not.
When another log entry is added to 2.4, do we use these or skip
these???
On Mar 6, 2012, at 6:21 PM, Jim Jagielski
On 07.03.2012 02:01, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
On 3/6/2012 6:32 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
I like the idea even if the current problem will be fixed without. I
think the locations of all created or read file can be influenced by
configuration except for some implicit files in
DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR
Since a user can now easily move all those non-log read/write files to a
central dir like /var/run/apache etc., do we think we need to keep the
files themselves separate between instances by choosing unique file
names (adding parent pid or similar)? Or should we document that you
should *not*
It seems using a rewrite map in a forward proxy is broken in 2.2.22. It
was working until 2.2.21. The problem is the fix for CVE-2011-4317 which
returns DECLINED in hook_uri2file() in mod_rewrite.
The config is roughly:
Listen 3128
VirtualHost *:3128
ProxyRequests on
RewriteEngine on
It should be RewriteRule not RewriteMap in my previous mail. I
simplified the config to a single RewriteRule but forgot to adjst
subject and intro of my mail. The problem remains the same.
On 23.03.2012 18:00, Rainer Jung wrote:
It seems using a rewrite map in a forward proxy is broken
On 24.03.2012 07:02, Kaspar Brand wrote:
On 23.03.2012 18:11, Rainer Jung wrote:
It should be RewriteRule not RewriteMap in my previous mail. I
simplified the config to a single RewriteRule but forgot to adjst
subject and intro of my mail. The problem remains the same.
Doesn't that ring
On 24.03.2012 16:39, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 24.03.2012 07:02, Kaspar Brand wrote:
On 23.03.2012 18:11, Rainer Jung wrote:
It should be RewriteRule not RewriteMap in my previous mail. I
simplified the config
On 25.03.2012 19:09, Jim Jagielski wrote:
How does the week of April 2nd sound? This should provide enough time
for the proposed backports to get enough votes and to propose
the backports based on recent trunk improvements...
Sound like a plan? I volunteer to RM.
On Mar 14, 2012, at 3:36 PM,
On 26.03.2012 22:59, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Mon Mar 26 20:59:11 2012
New Revision: 1305586
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1305586view=rev
Log:
Be more verbose when logging syntax errors
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/lua/lua_vmprep.c
Modified:
On 05.04.2012 00:10, Eric Covener wrote:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Michael Feltmamf...@gmail.com wrote:
Most shared modules would be built and loaded in the default
configuation, and there is a developer-mode flag to enable all the
modules compiled. The test suite onl y tests modules
Hi Igor,
On 11.04.2012 19:48, Igor Galić wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm currently trying to test a very minimal setup of httpd
trunk, and I'm failing because few disables a number of
modules our test suite takes for granted.
Right now I'm stuck in t/modules/alias.t
having a hard time deciding how to
...@brainsware.org) i.ga...@brainsware.org,
WilliamRowe (wr...@apache.org) wr...@apache.org, Daniel Gruno
(rum...@cord.dk)rum...@cord.dk, Eric Covener (cove...@gmail.com)
cove...@gmail.com, Rainer Jung (rainer.j...@kippdata.de)
rainer.j...@kippdata.de, bnicho...@netiq.com bnicho...@netiq.com,
Rich Bowen (rbo
On 05.04.2012 14:24, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.2 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.2 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make
On 15.04.2012 19:10, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.04.2012 18:54, schrieb Daniel Gruno:
so to me it looks as if either SSI or type assingment is currently
broken - at least on NetWare, not yet tested on other platforms ...
I have tested your SSI tag with 2.4.2 on Debian 6 and Fedora 16 with
On 04.05.2012 15:58, Daniel Gruno wrote:
[+1] Add commentary system to the trunk documentation.
Thanks for pushing this and helping Rich and the project with so much
positive energy.
Rainer
On 21.05.2012 23:04, Daniel Gruno wrote:
In light of recent concerns about the Disqus system, I've taken it upon
myself to figure out an alternative we can use for adding comments to
our pages. And so, through the better half of a day, I worked on
creating a new system that is without any evil
On 24.05.2012 17:12, Eric Covener wrote:
There are a couple of PR's going around about people who were using
rewrite to operate on URL's now kicked out of mod_rewrite by default
(IIRC at least proxy:blah and CONNECT arg)
Should we just add a mod_rewrite directive or RewriteOption that opts
in
On 08.07.2012 22:33, Daniel Gruno wrote:
[X] +1: Adopt the comments.a.o system in the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of docs
[ ] 0: I don't care
[ ] -1: Don't adopt the system, because
Thanks for your work on this!
Rainer
On 13.07.2012 18:02, Jim Jagielski wrote:
If these can be added somewhat quickly, I'm willing to fast-track
them into 2.4.3.
I drafted a patch available at
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/httpd-trunk-status-codes-iana.patch
Coments:
- I didn't fix the indentation in include/httpd.h
On 13.07.2012 21:52, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Friday 13 July 2012, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 13.07.2012 18:02, Jim Jagielski wrote:
If these can be added somewhat quickly, I'm willing to fast-track
them into 2.4.3.
I drafted a patch available at
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/httpd
On Jul 13, 2012, at 5:02 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Patch updated:
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/httpd-trunk-status-codes-iana-v1_1.patch
If noone objects, I'll commit during the weekend.
Regards,
Rainer
201 - 300 of 1303 matches
Mail list logo
