Re: mod_ssl, SNI and dynamic virtual hosts

2010-06-04 Thread Adam Hasselbalch Hansen
Adam Hasselbalch Hansen wrote: Thomas, Peter wrote: -Original Message- From: Adam Hasselbalch Hansen [mailto:a...@one.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 7:06 AM To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: mod_ssl, SNI and dynamic virtual hosts So what I'm attempting to get feedback

Re: mod_ssl, SNI and dynamic virtual hosts

2010-05-27 Thread Adam Hasselbalch Hansen
Thomas, Peter wrote: -Original Message- From: Adam Hasselbalch Hansen [mailto:a...@one.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 7:06 AM To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: mod_ssl, SNI and dynamic virtual hosts So what I'm attempting to get feedback on is whether or not it will be possible

Re: mod_ssl, SNI and dynamic virtual hosts

2010-05-25 Thread Adam Hasselbalch Hansen
Adam Hasselbalch Hansen wrote: We have a setup that uses an in-house module which works not entirely unlike mod_vhost_alias, in that it has a single virtual host configured, and then determines stuff like domain name, docroot, etc, from the request. We'd love to be able to use SSL

Re: mod_ssl, SNI and dynamic virtual hosts

2010-05-25 Thread Adam Hasselbalch Hansen
lead to. -- Adam Hasselbalch Hansen UNIX Systems Developer, CPH e: a...@one.com, w: www.one.com

mod_ssl, SNI and dynamic virtual hosts

2010-05-10 Thread Adam Hasselbalch Hansen
caching and other things? I'd love any feedback! -- Adam Hasselbalch Hansen UNIX Systems Developer, CPH e: a...@one.com, w: www.one.com

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-19 Thread Adam Hasselbalch Hansen
Plüm wrote: 1. Please provide a patch against trunk. mod_config_logger.c hasn't changed in trunk, so the patch will work fine. 2. Please also add a patch for the documentation. Done. 3. I am not too happy with using %R, but to be honest I have no better proposal :-). Maybe other

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-19 Thread Adam Hasselbalch Hansen
Nick Kew wrote: Looks more like legislation for ISPs than folks with a webserver. ISPs and hosting companies alike. I'd be sceptical about that applying to non-sessions such as HTTP requests. I think that semantics are lost on these people. Part 4: [Requirements don't apply if

[PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-18 Thread Adam Hasselbalch Hansen
I have created a patch for httpd 2.2.6, giving the additional LogFormat directive %R, which logs the port of the host making the request. This is due to new legislation in Denmark, requiring ISPs and hosting companies to log the originating port of all traffic. Any feedback is appreciated :)

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-18 Thread Adam Hasselbalch Hansen
Nick Kew wrote: On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:25:18 +0200 Adam Hasselbalch Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have created a patch for httpd 2.2.6, giving the additional LogFormat directive %R, which logs the port of the host making the request. This is due to new legislation in Denmark, requiring