We don't need a lock file at all.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 22, 2016, at 5:08 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote:
>
> apreq-devs:
>
> So looking at this, I accidentally committed bad logic with mod_version
> which led me to notice that tests don't seem to be failing without
Use libapreq2
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 13, 2016, at 5:08 PM, Mark Blackman wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Not sure if this is the right mailing list for this question, and feel free
> to redirect me if so, however, if I want to write a module to examine an HTTP
> POST body and
Most cookies don't use quoted values tho, and I'm not sure what this does for
those.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 30, 2016, at 10:51 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Rainer Canavan
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016
iPhone
> On Jun 28, 2016, at 7:58 PM, Joseph Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Anyways I agree with Bill that this isn't httpd's problem to fix. The cookie
> standards are abysmal which is why some level of strictness is required as
> regards the defacto httpd b
eph Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Or use ssl so proxies can't monkey with the request headers.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jun 28, 2016, at 7:48 PM, Joseph Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sales pitch: use libapreq2, which gra
Or use ssl so proxies can't monkey with the request headers.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 28, 2016, at 7:48 PM, Joseph Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Sales pitch: use libapreq2, which gracefully handles merged cookie headers
> anyway.
>
> Sent from m
Sales pitch: use libapreq2, which gracefully handles merged cookie headers
anyway.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 28, 2016, at 6:39 PM, Joseph Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> The industry standard behavior regarding cookies is for user agents to send
> at mo
The industry standard behavior regarding cookies is for user agents to send at
most a single cookie header, and for servers to avoid merging set-cookie
headers. The set-cookie2 header is merge able.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 28, 2016, at 6:14 PM, Rainer Canavan
will be affected, if at all.
On 24 February 2015 at 03:24, Joseph Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
wrote:
I still want to do that just lacking tuits
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 23, 2015, at 3:56 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Gregg Smith g
I still want to do that just lacking tuits
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 23, 2015, at 3:56 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Gregg Smith g...@gknw.net wrote:
Am I missing something? Did I miss a boatload of email where any firm
decision was made?
, 2013, at 1:02 PM, Joseph Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Been a while since I thought about this, but
apreq is really only suited for table-based
data structures. JSON is a little too generic
for that unless you know the data is restricted
to only key-value pairs.
On Nov 8, 2013
Been a while since I thought about this, but
apreq is really only suited for table-based
data structures. JSON is a little too generic
for that unless you know the data is restricted
to only key-value pairs.
On Nov 8, 2013, at 12:45 PM, Brian J. France br...@brianfrance.com wrote:
Does anybody
The directory handling still relies on this.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 30, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
All releases still have what I guess is an old pre-SetHandler
mechanism to allow content type - handler mappings. If no r-handler
has been set, but a
13 matches
Mail list logo