Hi Bill,
On 02.07.2013 01:47, wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
I am not at all concerned
whether APR 0.9 is
released again or not since folks had years to take that up in our
discussions of
putting httpd 2.0 to bed, yet nobody so much as suggested a release,
nevermind some
volunteer to act on it.
Hi,
Maybe the simple option is to do the final release with the old/existing
bundled APR, but put a foot note in the release notes that the newer APR
v1.4.8/1.5.2 has been confirmed to successfully work with 2.0.65. This
way it may give confidence to anyone who is stuck on 2.0.x for some
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:53 AM, MikeM michaelm12-asfbugzi...@aquaorange.net
wrote:
Hi,
Maybe the simple option is to do the final release with the old/existing
bundled APR, but put a foot note in the release notes that the newer APR
v1.4.8/1.5.2 has been confirmed to successfully work with
Hi
Oh I see - I had not realised this. In that case, I agree that sticking
with 0.9.x is the only sensible option at this point in time :)
Mike
On 02/07/2013 14:35, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:53 AM, MikeM
michaelm12-asfbugzi...@aquaorange.net
On 30 Jun 2013, Guenter Knauf observed;
it seems a bit odd to me that we now roll the 2.0.65 final without having
APR/APU
picking up latest fixes [1][2], making this release hanging around for ever
bundled
with APR/APU 0.9.x versions which lack latest stuff:
And in six months, some
