Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev

2011-11-03 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: I think 2.4.0 GA at AC is destined to be a dot zero release (most emphasis on the zero, as in null). Not suggesting we don't do it, simply that nobody, including yourself, will be at liberty to change scoreboard datum, api interfaces, etc. Are we

Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev

2011-11-03 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Nov 3, 2011, at 2:43 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: I think 2.4.0 GA at AC is destined to be a dot zero release (most emphasis on the zero, as in null). Not suggesting we don't do it, simply that nobody, including yourself, will be at liberty to

Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev

2011-11-03 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 11/3/2011 6:55 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Not sure what you mean... we've added additional fields, always at the end of the struct, during releases with just a minor MMN bump before. To the scoreboard?

Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev

2011-11-03 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Nov 3, 2011, at 2:43 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: I think 2.4.0 GA at AC is destined to be a dot zero release (most emphasis on the zero, as in null). Not suggesting we don't do it, simply that

Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev

2011-11-03 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 11/3/2011 6:55 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Not sure what you mean... we've added additional fields, always at the end of the struct, during releases with just a minor MMN bump before. To the scoreboard? There are functions like

Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev

2011-10-29 Thread Graham Leggett
On 28 Oct 2011, at 10:37 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: I believe apr-util v1.4 (containing apr_crypto) is also ready That would be a subject for discussion on another list Please don't quote half my sentence back at me, I said this: I believe apr-util v1.4 (containing apr_crypto) is also

Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev

2011-10-28 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 10/27/2011 12:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Still hoping to get these out, esp getting the ball rolling for an actual 2.4.0 GA by ApacheCon… There is a hold up due to an issue which may need to be fixed/addressed and that's the reason for the delay... I'm happy to help by rolling 2.0.65,

Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev

2011-10-28 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Oct 28, 2011, at 3:10 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 10/27/2011 12:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Still hoping to get these out, esp getting the ball rolling for an actual 2.4.0 GA by ApacheCon… There is a hold up due to an issue which may need to be fixed/addressed and that's the

Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev

2011-10-28 Thread Steffen
Is the Win32DisableAcceptEx issue solved ? - Original Message - From: Jim Jagielski j...@apache.org To: dev@httpd.apache.org Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 2:35 PM Subject: Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev On Oct 28, 2011, at 3:10 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 10/27/2011 12:31 PM

Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev

2011-10-28 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Steffen i...@apachelounge.com wrote: Is the Win32DisableAcceptEx issue solved ? A fix for the AcceptFilter+windows+vhost thing was checked in a few weeks ago

Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev

2011-10-28 Thread Steffen
Cannot find it in Trunk. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Eric Covener Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 3:13 PM To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Steffen i...@apachelounge.com wrote: Is the Win32DisableAcceptEx issue

Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev

2011-10-28 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Steffen i...@apachelounge.com wrote: Cannot find it in Trunk. IIUC This is the fix for ip-based vhosts with AcceptFilter none on windows in trunk: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1181140

Re: ******** Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev

2011-10-28 Thread Steffen
Great, time to make 2.3.15 available to test. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Eric Covener Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 4:38 PM To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Steffen i...@apachelounge.com wrote: Cannot

Re: ******** Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev

2011-10-28 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Steffen i...@apachelounge.com wrote: Great, time to make 2.3.15 available to test. It would be most useful to be tested ahead of being part of an attempted release.

Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev

2011-10-28 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 10/28/2011 7:51 AM, Steffen wrote: Is the Win32DisableAcceptEx issue solved ? It wouldn't matter. The delta between 2.3.x-beta and 2.4.0 is not a code freeze... it is API freeze, any public interfaces must be baked. We won't be changing ap_doit() to add or change an argument until 2.6.0,

Re: ******** Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev

2011-10-28 Thread Gregg L. Smith
On 10/28/2011 8:00 AM, Eric Covener wrote: On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Steffeni...@apachelounge.com wrote: Great, time to make 2.3.15 available to test. It would be most useful to be tested ahead of being part of an attempted release. For the pre-mentioned AcceptFilter+windows+vhost

Re: ******** Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev

2011-10-28 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 10/28/2011 6:07 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote: On 10/28/2011 8:00 AM, Eric Covener wrote: On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Steffeni...@apachelounge.com wrote: Great, time to make 2.3.15 available to test. It would be most useful to be tested ahead of being part of an attempted release. For

2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev

2011-10-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
Still hoping to get these out, esp getting the ball rolling for an actual 2.4.0 GA by ApacheCon… There is a hold up due to an issue which may need to be fixed/addressed and that's the reason for the delay...

Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev

2011-10-27 Thread Sander Temme
On Oct 27, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Still hoping to get these out, esp getting the ball rolling for an actual 2.4.0 GA by ApacheCon… There is a hold up due to an issue which may need to be fixed/addressed and that's the reason for the delay... Thanks Jim, I was just

Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev

2011-10-27 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Oct 27, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Sander Temme wrote: On Oct 27, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Still hoping to get these out, esp getting the ball rolling for an actual 2.4.0 GA by ApacheCon… There is a hold up due to an issue which may need to be fixed/addressed and that's the