On 7/18/2012 8:49 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Claudio Caldato (MS OPEN TECH)
claud...@microsoft.com wrote:
I have a dev available now so we are ready to start.
I have been out of the loop for a while so I’ll start by looking at
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:11 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 7/18/2012 8:49 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Claudio Caldato (MS OPEN TECH)
claud...@microsoft.com wrote:
I have a dev available now so we are ready to start.
I have been out of the
On 7/31/2012 3:27 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:11 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 7/18/2012 8:49 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Claudio Caldato (MS OPEN TECH)
claud...@microsoft.com wrote:
I have a dev available now so we
From: Claudio Caldato (MS OPEN TECH)
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 2:46 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: Status of Windows-work for 2.4.x
Hi guys,
I guess I'm the 'nice guy from Microsoft' :)
Sorry for the long silence. I have been waiting for one of our developers to
finish other
On 07/18/2012 05:49 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Is it possible that this results in flaky behavior depending on
third-party software installed?
Well, MSDN clearly states:
quote
Note: The function pointer for the AcceptEx function must be obtained
at run time by making a call to the WSAIoctl
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 07/18/2012 05:49 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Is it possible that this results in flaky behavior depending on
third-party software installed?
Well, MSDN clearly states:
quote
Note: The function pointer for the AcceptEx
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote:
On 07/18/2012 05:49 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Is it possible that this results in flaky behavior depending on
third-party software installed?
Well,
Is here any progess? Since there is a nice guy from microsoft, we should
use that!
Mario
Send from my toaster via IPv6
On Thursday, May 17, 2012, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 5/14/2012 6:08 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On May 13, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Steffen wrote:
No news from here too. Complaints
weeks.
Claudio
From: Mario Brandt [jbl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 2:18 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Status of Windows-work for 2.4.x
Is here any progess? Since there is a nice guy from microsoft, we should use
that!
Mario
Send
On 5/14/2012 6:08 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On May 13, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Steffen wrote:
No news from here too. Complaints from the Win community are growing.
I know that I've pinged MS for help and that we rec'd some
offers from MS engineers to assist us. Have we taken advantage
of that?
On May 13, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Steffen wrote:
No news from here too. Complaints from the Win community are growing.
I know that I've pinged MS for help and that we rec'd some
offers from MS engineers to assist us. Have we taken advantage
of that?
Jr.
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2012 10:12 PM Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.devel
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: Jim Jagielski
Subject: Re: Status of Windows-work for 2.4.x
On 5/3/2012 8:47 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm curious what the status of 2.4.x-on-Windows is... What else
can we do to speed
On 5/3/2012 8:47 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm curious what the status of 2.4.x-on-Windows is... What else
can we do to speed this along?
Can't speak for anyone but myself; I am just recovering from a month of
changing machines
over and over again due to a dead critical/primary laptop. Now
I'm curious what the status of 2.4.x-on-Windows is... What else
can we do to speed this along?
14 matches
Mail list logo
