Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
I offer to be RM.
I think we should start thinking about it too. I think we should also
consider requesting that APR{,-Util} 1.2.8 gets done by the APR
developers...
while we are on the subject to of apr...May i ask why the lib's have a 1 appended to it in 2.2.x? Most (read nearly all) 3rd party modules link to the old filename.JorgeOn 11/8/06,
Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote: Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should start
Scroll back a half hour :)
Seriously - do folks need the extra day - or does anyone object to Friday
midday?
Paul Querna wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
I offer to be RM.
I think we should
