Re: h2_proxy_util.c, is this going make 2.4.21?

Saw last minute change mod-http2 to version 1.5.11. Running now: mod_http2 (v1.5.11, feats=, nghttp2 1.11.1), initializing... -Original Message- From: Steffen Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 11:57 AM To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: h2_proxy_util.c, is this going make 2.4.21

Re: h2_proxy_util.c, is this going make 2.4.21?

Thx! I'll plan on T tomorrow w/ a release on Monday. > On Jun 15, 2016, at 5:57 AM, Steffen wrote: > > > Running now 2.4.21-dev pulled today (wednesday), exported revision 1748510. > > > So far all good. > > > > > > > On Wednesday 15/06/2016 at 01:11, Gregg

Re: h2_proxy_util.c, is this going make 2.4.21?

Running now 2.4.21-dev pulled today (wednesday), exported revision 1748510. So far all good. On Wednesday 15/06/2016 at 01:11, Gregg Smith wrote: Hi Steffen, Attached is a svn pull from about 1 hour after I committed my changes. No need to wait for tag if you would rather get a

Re: h2_proxy_util.c, is this going make 2.4.21?

sorry, that was not supposed to go to list. On 6/14/2016 4:01 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: Hi Steffen, Attached is a svn pull from about 1 hour after I committed my changes. No need to wait for tag if you would rather get a jump on testing. To maybe hit the 3 or 4 days after when you find bugs.

Re: h2_proxy_util.c, is this going make 2.4.21?

Thanks, Gregg! > Am 14.06.2016 um 17:27 schrieb Gregg Smith : > > I've committed my changes and the module builds and loads but that is as far > as I got. > > Thanks everyone, > > Gregg > > On 6/14/2016 4:47 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: >>> Am 14.06.2016 um 13:18 schrieb Jim

Re: h2_proxy_util.c, is this going make 2.4.21?

I've committed my changes and the module builds and loads but that is as far as I got. Thanks everyone, Gregg On 6/14/2016 4:47 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: Am 14.06.2016 um 13:18 schrieb Jim Jagielski: Let's hold off on the tag then... How about if I bump the T from today to

Re: h2_proxy_util.c, is this going make 2.4.21?

> Am 14.06.2016 um 13:18 schrieb Jim Jagielski : > > Let's hold off on the tag then... How about if I bump the T > from today to Thurs? +1 I would like to have any Window build issues detected and resolved before the tag. -Stefan >> On Jun 14, 2016, at 5:17 AM, Steffen

Re: h2_proxy_util.c, is this going make 2.4.21?

Let's hold off on the tag then... How about if I bump the T from today to Thurs? > On Jun 14, 2016, at 5:17 AM, Steffen wrote: > > Then I wait for the Tag. > > You know with me, that http2 in real live testing needs extended time for > testing. Happened more then once

Re: h2_proxy_util.c, is this going make 2.4.21?

Then I wait for the Tag. You know with me, that http2 in real live testing needs extended time for testing. Happened more then once that a crash/issue was showing up,after 3/4 days. So hope that 72 hours is enough. Steffen On Tuesday 14/06/2016 at 11:09, Stefan Eissing wrote: Steffen,

Re: h2_proxy_util.c, is this going make 2.4.21?

I rather like to test before tagging. Can you apply these changes for my testing also to Git ? Steffen On Tuesday 14/06/2016 at 10:54, Stefan Eissing wrote: I just backported the h2_proxy_util.c change in r1748359. It also uses the back ported ap_cstr_casecmp* instead of its own copies. I

Re: h2_proxy_util.c, is this going make 2.4.21?

I just backported the h2_proxy_util.c change in r1748359. It also uses the back ported ap_cstr_casecmp* instead of its own copies. I tried to update the win build files appropriately, but am unable to check the correctness. Gregg: please commit your changes when awake enough. Hopefully Jim can

Re: h2_proxy_util.c, is this going make 2.4.21?

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: > I have the to connect this module in the traditional windows build but as > of right now it's using h2_util.c which Bill had an objection to. See his > comments http://marc.info/?l=apache-httpd-dev=146543811201820=2 > > So to

Re: h2_proxy_util.c, is this going make 2.4.21?

I won't be able to do this today, but can tomorrow. Otherwise anyone with time to merge back the change, please do. > Am 13.06.2016 um 20:59 schrieb Gregg Smith : > > I have the to connect this module in the traditional windows build but as of > right now it's using h2_util.c

Re: h2_proxy_util.c, is this going make 2.4.21?

I have the to connect this module in the traditional windows build but as of right now it's using h2_util.c which Bill had an objection to. See his comments http://marc.info/?l=apache-httpd-dev=146543811201820=2 So to me that seems to be a -1 to mod_proxy_http2, at minimum on Windows. In

Re: h2_proxy_util.c, is this going make 2.4.21?

What needs to be done? > On Jun 13, 2016, at 2:20 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: > > Hi Stefan, > > Any plans to backport this before Jim tags 2.4.21 tomorrow? > > Thanks, > > Gregg >

h2_proxy_util.c, is this going make 2.4.21?

Hi Stefan, Any plans to backport this before Jim tags 2.4.21 tomorrow? Thanks, Gregg