On 29-Nov-04, at 11:02 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Yes, but our API dictates that they are looking for ...
(in the case of this module) - which is a bad thing IMHO (and in
Greg's and Ryan's as well)...
Sorry, I don't understand that. The search for is in the first line
of the directive; arg
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 09:44:14AM -0500, Rici Lake wrote:
...
Just out of curiousity, what do people think is wrong with the
Comment directive implemented by this micro-module:
https://ssl.bulix.org/projects/rici/file/apache/mod_comment.c?rev=49
That module uses a feature of the
On 29-Nov-04, at 10:10 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
So no... I don't like mod_comment. It uses a feature that I dearly
wish to see removed from httpd.
I agree 100% on removing that feature. If it were gone, something
like mod_comment would have to be implemented in the core, I suppose.
However, I was not
* Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
https://ssl.bulix.org/projects/rici/file/apache/mod_comment.c?rev=49
That module uses a feature of the configuration parser that should be
removed. The capability of code external to the config parser taking
over the reading/parsing of the config file
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 04:20:21PM +0100, Andr? Malo wrote:
* Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
https://ssl.bulix.org/projects/rici/file/apache/mod_comment.c?rev=49
That module uses a feature of the configuration parser that should be
removed. The capability of code external to the
* Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taking over the reading/parsing of the file pointer. We pass the fp to
modules (when they process a directive), allowing them to read from
it. Bad bad bad. Especially when you're trying to read your config
from some place funky.
I seem to miss something
At 09:31 AM 11/29/2004, André Malo wrote:
* Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taking over the reading/parsing of the file pointer. We pass the fp to
modules (when they process a directive), allowing them to read from
it. Bad bad bad. Especially when you're trying to read your config
from
* William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the offending code;
endp = ap_strrchr_c(arg, '');
if (endp == NULL) {
return unclosed_directive(cmd);
}
Aah! understood, thanks ;-)
So I'd guess, there's currently no good way for implementing containers?
nd
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 07:33:35PM +0100, Andr? Malo wrote:
* William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the offending code;
endp = ap_strrchr_c(arg, '');
if (endp == NULL) {
return unclosed_directive(cmd);
}
Aah! understood, thanks ;-)
So I'd
--On Monday, November 29, 2004 10:41 AM -0800 Greg Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
but we were not allowed to remove features. Removing the fp from the
API would have disabled this feature in mod_perl, among others.
I can't tell you how often I've been bitten personally by mod_perl trying to
10 matches
Mail list logo
