[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ rpluem says: Without r571927 the documentation for mod_authn_dbd fails
+ to build.
I found that while trying to write the documentation, Firefox refused to
parse the XML file at the start, complaining about the nbsp; non
breaking space
* Graham Leggett wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ rpluem says: Without r571927 the documentation for mod_authn_dbd
fails + to build.
I found that while trying to write the documentation, Firefox refused to
parse the XML file at the start, complaining about the nbsp;
André Malo wrote:
Is nbsp; valid in XML?
Given the proper Doctype, sure.
However, firefox refuses a lot. This does not mean it's not valid. The char
entity problem is well-known, but invalid (firefox only uses DTDs out of
the chrome scheme, for whatever reason). The doc build system
* Graham Leggett wrote:
André Malo wrote:
Is nbsp; valid in XML?
Given the proper Doctype, sure.
However, firefox refuses a lot. This does not mean it's not valid. The
char entity problem is well-known, but invalid (firefox only uses DTDs
out of the chrome scheme, for whatever
On Sep 2, 2007, at 5:24 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is nbsp; valid in XML?
The answer is complicated. One approach is to use #xA0; which is
kinda ugly but works in lots more places. -T
On 02.09.2007, at 17:06, Tim Bray wrote:
On Sep 2, 2007, at 5:24 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is nbsp; valid in XML?
The answer is complicated. One approach is to use #xA0; which is
kinda ugly but works in lots more places. -T
Yep, quite complicated - it has to
