Igor Galić wrote:
One of the several things I'm uncertain about, though,
is how to distinguish the case of just wanting to override, say,
the Host header *after* the VirtualHost has been selected (perhaps
this is the default case, to work like RemoteIPHeader), from the
extra case of using
One of the several things I'm uncertain about, though,
is how to distinguish the case of just wanting to override, say,
the Host header *after* the VirtualHost has been selected (perhaps
this is the default case, to work like RemoteIPHeader), from the
extra case of using the inserted new
On 5/3/2012 5:57 PM, Chris Darroch wrote:
Hence this patch, which adds a UseCanonicalName XHost option in
which X-Forwarded-Host is checked first, and if non-blank, is used
in place of Host to determine the server name. (The Host header is
left as-is, though.)
That describes your use
On 5/3/2012 6:14 PM, Igor Gali? wrote:
- Chris Darroch chr...@pearsoncmg.com wrote:
Hence this patch, which adds a UseCanonicalName XHost option in
which X-Forwarded-Host is checked first, and if non-blank, is used
in place of Host to determine the server name. (The Host header is
left
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 5/3/2012 6:14 PM, Igor Gali? wrote:
Wouldn't it be more appropriate to hack up^W^Wexpand mod_remoteip?
That answer seems sensible to me, too.
Thanks, guys, for pointing me at mod_remoteip; I agree it's a more
logical place for this kind of thing.
The
On 5/3/2012 5:57 PM, Chris Darroch wrote:
I promise I won't
be offended if anyone says it's a stupid hack and should never be
committed, because, well, it is arguably a very stupid hack.
Actually, I think one could make the argument that all of the headers
set by mod_proxy should be just as
Hi --
It's been a remarkably long time since I had anything useful
to commit, and I'm pretty rusty, so I thought I'd throw this out for
discussion as a RTC despite the CTR rules on trunk. I promise I won't
be offended if anyone says it's a stupid hack and should never be
committed, because,
- Chris Darroch chr...@pearsoncmg.com wrote:
Hi --
It's been a remarkably long time since I had anything useful
to commit, and I'm pretty rusty, so I thought I'd throw this out for
discussion as a RTC despite the CTR rules on trunk. I promise I won't
be offended if anyone says it's a