One question about `||` vs ``, but that should be easily answered. Otherwise,
+1 - looks good to me. Thanks for the adjustments, @abayer!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/206#issuecomment-28865289
Once 1.6.3 is out, do we need to carry out some cleanup of the jclouds
incubator site [1]? I haven't read this recent thread yet in full, but
it seems to relate to similar issues:
http://markmail.org/thread/3y7hmelendts36th
ap
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/jclouds.html
+
+Tag editedTag = new Tag.Builder()
+.meta(meta)
+.name(Edited Tag)
+.resources(ImmutableList.of(
+new TagResource.Builder()
+.uuid(createdDrive.getUuid())
+
+Tag editedTag = new Tag.Builder()
+.meta(meta)
+.name(Edited Tag)
+.resources(ImmutableList.of(
+new TagResource.Builder()
+.uuid(createdDrive.getUuid())
+
@@ -544,7 +543,7 @@ public void testEditProfileInfo() throws Exception {
.address(edited address)
.bankReference(sigma111)
.company(Awesome company)
-.country(USA)
+.country(ES)
:-)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it
+))
+.build();
+
+checkTag(editedTag, api.editTag(createdTag.getUuid(), editedTag));
+}
+
+@Test(dependsOnMethods = {testEditTag})
+public void testDeleteTag() throws Exception{
+api.deleteTag(createdTag.getUuid());
+}
+
+
Thanks, @nacx! Just a couple of small comments.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/38#issuecomment-28895596
@nacx: Should we create a JIRA issue for this, or is this mainly part of
work-in-progress..?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/37#issuecomment-28895956
Anyway, if you prefer a JIRA I'm ok with having it too :)
No, in this situation I'm fine without it...
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/37#issuecomment-28900278
Yup, mentioned in the wiki.
Doh, sloppy reading, sorry. It didn't render properly for me, I think
(see attachment) - should be fixed now [1]?
ap
[1]
https://wiki.apache.org/jclouds/Releasing%20jclouds?action=diffrev1=27rev2=28
http://www.apache.org/dist/jclouds/KEYS
Would we need to add your apache.org email address to the key?
pub 2048R/730FC232 2013-10-14
uid Andrew Gaul and...@gaul.org
sig 3730FC232 2013-10-14 Andrew Gaul and...@gaul.org
sig 508D20E9 2013-10-16 Matt
Should we publish 1.7 alpha/beta artifacts like we did pre-ASF? Ideally
we would have done this regularly during the 1.7 development cycle.
If we can find a way to do this reasonably quickly (ideally,
automatically!) I'm sure that would help. As it is (hope it's been
smooth for you, Andrew
Should we publish 1.7 alpha/beta artifacts like we did pre-ASF? Ideally
we would have done this regularly during the 1.7 development cycle.
...
Would work for me - they've been stable for ages, see active use and
improvements and don't feel significantly less generic that e.g.
route53.
ap
I
@wrigri PS: I'm guessing you've _run_ the live tests with this change, by the
way? ;-)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/15#issuecomment-28927776
I ran integration tests against Atmos, Amazon EC2, Amazon S3, Azure, and
Cloud Files. Azure receives the teacher's apple and Amazon EC2 wins the
skunk award:
Hm...quite a lot of AWS EC2 failures there compared to last time [1].
Any thoughts on what might be causing this? Have we seen
Committed to
[master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-labs-google.git;h=cf7adb8).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/15#issuecomment-28928028
Yes, I ran the live tests with this change
Thanks for confirming, @wrigri!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/15#issuecomment-28931890
+/**
+ * Select internal URL endpoints services
+ *
+ * @author Ignacio Mulas
+ */
+@Singleton
+public class InternalURL implements EndpointToSupplierInternalURI {
+ @Override
+ public SupplierURI apply(Endpoint input) {
+ return
Minor note: a couple of the files use two-space and/or tab rather than 3-space
indents
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/142#issuecomment-28932369
+ */
+@Test(groups = live, testName = InternalURLLiveTest)
+public class InternalURLLiveTest extends BaseNovaApiLiveTest {
+
+ @Singleton
+ class InternalUrlModule extends AbstractModule {
+ @Override
+ protected void configure() {
+
[1] http://jclouds.apache.org/documentation/releasenotes/1.6.2-tests/
That page does not have results for aws-ec2, only aws-s3.
Doh! Indeed. You're right, I don't think we ran the AWS EC2 live tests
last time..?
The remainder of the comparison looks stable enough ;-)
ap
@@ -138,29 +150,34 @@ public void testDeleteDrives() throws Exception {
for (DriveInfo driveInfo : createdDrives) {
stringListBuilder.add(driveInfo.getUuid());
}
- api.deleteDrives(stringListBuilder.build());
+ ImmutableListString uuids =
rebased and addressed your comments.
@nacx: Thanks!
I'll keep out of the decision on what to do about
_testListSubscriptionsCalculator_ - otherwise, just needs a squash of commits
and would then be good to go for me.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Committed to master and 1.6.x.
Thanks for catching the additional incubating ones too, @andrewgaul!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/213#issuecomment-29052141
My vote is a +1 for the release.
I guess that needs to go in the [VOTE] thread too? And we need to move
the discussion about the keys *from* the [VOTE] thread to the
[DISCUSS] thread ;-)
ap
We only use the shared resources for the Checkstyle config now, and that
doesn#39;t need to be quot;mixed inquot; to the project output directory
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds remove-remote-res-plugin
Or you can view, comment on it, or
Committed to
[master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-labs-openstack.git;h=96c8340)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/55#issuecomment-29021517
Committed to
[master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-cli.git;h=85568c9)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-cli/pull/15#issuecomment-29024107
Weird failure in placing the comment from the [DEV@cloud
build](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/view/pull%20requests/job/jclouds-karaf-pull-requests/19/consoleFull),
but the result looks OK:
```
INFO: Apache jclouds :: Karaf ... SUCCESS [16.448s]
Nov 21, 2013 1:33:39 PM
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack remove-disclaimer
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/55
-- Commit Summary --
* JCLOUDS-387: Removing
Committed to
[master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-labs.git;h=21acd9e)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/39#issuecomment-29021186
Committed to
[master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds.git;h=4f95de2)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/211#issuecomment-29020742
+1, second commit addresses the first failure.
Thanks, @andrewgaul! Just pushed a squashed version.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-cli/pull/15#issuecomment-29022283
Committed to
[master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-chef.git;h=5cbba5c)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-chef/pull/38#issuecomment-29021736
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs remove-disclaimer
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/39
-- Commit Summary --
* JCLOUDS-387: Removing DISCLAIMER file now that
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-chef remove-disclaimer
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-chef/pull/38
-- Commit Summary --
* JCLOUDS-387: Removing DISCLAIMER file now that
Good catches - thanks! +1 - looks good to me.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/213#issuecomment-29009800
You can drop that file. Probably should as well. BTW we aren't mentors
anymore, jclouds has graduated. :)
Is trusted friend of the project and advisor OK? ;-)
Thanks for the input, David. My vote would also be to fix and respin...
ap
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf remove-disclaimer
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/27
-- Commit Summary --
* JCLOUDS-387: Removing DISCLAIMER file now that
@zack-shoylev: Reviewing the [output from
release:prepare](http://pastie.org/private/uu7wabhqfpdzzplzibgsza), it looks
like the additional `version..` property may actually be unnecessary:
```
Dependency 'org.apache.jclouds:jclouds-project' is a snapshot (1.7.0-SNAPSHOT)
: Which release version
Committed to
[master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-karaf.git;h=34751a9)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/27#issuecomment-29022128
The idea behind this change is to give the jclouds user a way of selecting
the internalUrl from the services catalog
returned by keystone.
Ah, so you would use it as demonstrated in the test: create a module to
override the standard EndpointToSupplierURI binding and pass that module to the
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-cli remove-disclaimer
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-cli/pull/15
-- Commit Summary --
* JCLOUDS-387: Removing DISCLAIMER file now that
@abayer: are you planning to update the release verification script
[1]? The dists location has changed - I'm about to figure out what
else I need to tweak in the Windows version ;-)
ap
[1] http://people.apache.org/~abayer/verify_jclouds_release.sh
I would like to keep this consistent though
Agree. So let's leave it in for now. But it's good to know the opportunity
exists, and what the potential costs are ;-)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-cli/pull/14#issuecomment-29049258
@abayer Since, from what I can see, you were the last person to touch the
remote-resources config, could you kindly have a look at this when you have a
minute? Thanks!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/212#issuecomment-29050133
Squashed. Waiting for a final DEV@cloud build before merging.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-cli/pull/14#issuecomment-29050727
Hi Reka
We would like to control the network interfaces via jclouds when creating a
node. We came up with this when trying with openstack Grizzly where we can
configure more than one network per project. Is there any way that we can
pass network or networks to a node via jclouds?
Could you
Committed to
[master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds.git;h=981db34).
Thanks, @abayer!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/212#issuecomment-29119209
Noticed $subject. Is it the case?
I'm hardly the expert here, and this probably makes more sense to some
of the Rackspace folks on the mailing list. But just to clarify: would
this be the same type of region as referred to in the Nova command
line client docs [1]?
--os-region-name
Thanks for investigating. AFAIK Openstack has a 3 layer hierarchy :
Region -- Zone -- Host
1 : n
1: m
OK, now we're leaving the land of my OpenStack expertise. I hope one
of the OpenStack gurus on the list (or on IRC?) can shed more light on
this
it requires changes to the api and the domain model, and it is out of scope
of this one. Good to merge then?
After squashing, yes - looks good to me!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/38#issuecomment-29161175
@@ -236,6 +236,14 @@ public GoogleComputeEngineTemplateOptions
userMetadata(String key, String value)
* {@inheritDoc}
*/
@Override
+ public GoogleComputeEngineTemplateOptions nodeNames(IterableString
nodeNames) {
Just doing things the same way for this method call as
+import javax.inject.Singleton;
+
+import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkArgument;
+import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkNotNull;
+
+/**
+ * @author Everett Toews
+ */
+@Singleton
+public class BindIdsToQueryParam implements Binder {
+
+
UUID clientId =
UUID.fromString(3381af92-2b9e-11e3-b191-71861300734c);
+ messageIds.put(zoneId, new ArrayListString());
`Lists.newArrayList()`?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/57/files#r7881672
@@ -136,6 +144,23 @@ public void streamManyPagesOfMessages() throws Exception
{
}
@Test(dependsOnMethods = { streamManyPagesOfMessages })
+ public void listMessagesByIds() throws Exception {
+ for (String zoneId : api.getConfiguredZones()) {
+ MessageApi
+import java.util.Map;
+
+import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkNotNull;
+
+/**
+ * A queue.
+ *
+ * @author Everett Toews
+ */
+public class Queue {
+
+ private final String name;
+ private final MapString, String metadata;
+
+ protected Queue(String name,
+
+ ListMessage messages = messageApi.list(clientId, ids);
+
+ assertEquals(messages.size(), 3);
+
+ for (Message message: messages) {
+assertNotNull(message.getId());
+assertNotNull(message.getBody());
+
boolean exists(@PathParam(name) String name);
- // TODO stream method!
+ /**
+* List the queues.
[minor] Lists...?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/56/files#r7881698
}
}
@Test(dependsOnMethods = { create })
+ public void listOnePageOfQueues() throws Exception {
+ for (String zoneId : api.getConfiguredZones()) {
+ QueueApi queueApi = api.getQueueApiForZone(zoneId);
+ ListQueue queues =
@@ -35,20 +38,96 @@
@Test(groups = live, testName = QueueApiLiveTest, singleThreaded = true)
public class QueueApiLiveTest extends BaseMarconiApiLiveTest {
+ public void listZeroPagesOfQueues() throws Exception {
+ for (String zoneId : api.getConfiguredZones()) {
+
assertTrue(success);
}
}
@Test(dependsOnMethods = { setMetadata })
+ public void listManyPagesOfQueuesWithDetails() throws Exception {
+ for (String zoneId : api.getConfiguredZones()) {
+ QueueApi queueApi = api.getQueueApiForZone(zoneId);
+
+ server.enqueue(new MockResponse().setBody(accessRackspace));
+ server.enqueue(new
MockResponse().setResponseCode(200).setBody({\queues\: [{\href\:
\/v1/queues/jclouds-test-1\, \name\: \jclouds-test-1\}, {\href\:
\/v1/queues/jclouds-test-10\, \name\: \jclouds-test-10\}, {\href\:
@@ -122,6 +128,120 @@ public void doesNotExistQueue() throws Exception {
}
}
+ public void listZeroPagesOfQueues() throws Exception {
+ MockWebServer server = mockOpenStackServer();
+ server.enqueue(new MockResponse().setBody(accessRackspace));
+
@@ -128,7 +232,7 @@ public void delete() throws Exception {
public void doesNotExist() throws Exception {
for (String zoneId : api.getConfiguredZones()) {
QueueApi queueApi = api.getQueueApiForZone(zoneId);
- boolean success = queueApi.exists(jclouds-test);
+
A couple of real questions and one (minor) repeated comment about adding
messages to `assertNotNull` and `assertTrue/False`? Makes figuring out what has
failed in Jenkins etc. much easier...
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@Path(/messages)
MessageStream stream(@HeaderParam(Client-ID) UUID clientId,
-StreamOptions... options);
+StreamMessagesOptions... options);
+
+ /**
+* List specific messages. Unlike the stream method, a client's own
messages
@@ -136,6 +144,23 @@ public void streamManyPagesOfMessages() throws Exception
{
}
@Test(dependsOnMethods = { streamManyPagesOfMessages })
+ public void listMessagesByIds() throws Exception {
+ for (String zoneId : api.getConfiguredZones()) {
+ MessageApi
@@ -136,6 +144,23 @@ public void streamManyPagesOfMessages() throws Exception
{
}
@Test(dependsOnMethods = { streamManyPagesOfMessages })
+ public void listMessagesByIds() throws Exception {
+ for (String zoneId : api.getConfiguredZones()) {
+ MessageApi
@@ -37,10 +37,7 @@ public String getValue() {
}
public static NetworkType fromValue(String value) {
- for (NetworkType networkType : values()) {
- if (networkType.getValue().equalsIgnoreCase(value))
-return networkType;
- }
- return null;
+
+
+ /**
+* Returns the list of all routers currently defined in Neutron for the
current tenant. The list provides the unique
+* identifier of each router configured for the tenant
+*
+* @return the list of all router references configured for the tenant.
+*/
+
+
+ @Override
+ protected FunctionObject, IterableWithMarkerReferenceWithName
markerToNextForArg0(OptionalObject arg0) {
+ String zone = arg0.isPresent() ? arg0.get().toString() : null;
+ final RouterApi routerApi =
api.getRouterExtensionForZone(zone).get();
+
Thanks for responding to the review comments, @KrisSterckx!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/47#issuecomment-29208427
jclouds-java-7-pull-requests #880 UNSTABLE
Haven't looked at the code, just wanted to add that that looks like an
[unrelated test
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
* @author Nick Livens
* @see a
href=http://docs.openstack.org/api/openstack-network/2.0/content/Subnets.html;api
doc/a
*/
-public class AllocationPool {
+public final class AllocationPool {
Ah, yes, I recall. Thanks for the reminder, @KrisSterckx!
---
Reply to
I started the 1.6.3-rc2 release yesterday but INFRA-7048 blocks me from
closing the staging repository:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7048
Thanks for the update, Andrew G. Hope this gets fixed soon!
ap
+ *
+ * @author Andrew Bayer
+ */
+@Test(groups = live, singleThreaded = true, testName =
ProjectApiLiveTest)
+public class ProjectApiLiveTest extends BaseCloudStackApiLiveTest {
+
+ @Test
+ public void testListAccounts() throws Exception {
+ for (Project project :
+ *
+ * @see a
+ *
href=http://download.cloud.com/releases/3.0.6/api_3.0.6/root_admin/listProjects.html;
+ * /
+ * @author Andrew Bayer
+ */
+public class ListProjectsOptions extends AccountInDomainOptions {
+
+ public static final ListProjectsOptions NONE = new
+ }
+ }
+
+ private final String id;
+ private final String account;
+ private final String displayText;
+ private final String domain;
+ private final String domainId;
+ private final String name;
+ private final State state;
+
+ @ConstructorProperties({
+
Waiting for BuildHive, but (pending squash'n'commit) looks good to me! Thanks,
@abayer!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/215#issuecomment-29314397
Squashed, rebased, waiting to see how it does to be safe.
All the builders are happy, it seems! ;-)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/215#issuecomment-29315890
@@ -41,7 +44,11 @@ public static void deleteRecursively(File file) throws
IOException {
}
}
if (!file.delete()) {
- throw new IOException(Could not delete: + file);
+ // On windows, often the directory does not register as empty right
away.
+
don't want to slow tests down, they are slow as is.
Fair enough!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/217#issuecomment-2931
+import java.util.Date;
+
+/**
+ * @author Vladimir Shevchenko
+ */
+public class CalcSubscription {
+
+ public static class Builder {
+ private String amount;
+ private double discountAmount;
+ private double discountPercent;
+ private Date endTime;
+
@@ -944,25 +947,13 @@ IPInfo editIP(@PathParam(uuid) String uuid
/**
* This is identical to the listSubscriptions(), except that
subscriptions are not actually bought.
*
-* @return list of subscriptions that are not actually bought.
+* @return List of subscriptions
+ this.resource = resource;
+ return this;
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * @param startTime Start time of subscription
+ * @return Subscription Binder
+ */
+ public Builder startTime(Date startTime) {
+ this.startTime = startTime;
+
@@ -587,9 +588,29 @@ public void testGetSubscription() throws Exception {
}
@Test
- public void testListSubscriptionsCalculator() throws Exception {
- for (Subscription subscription :
api.listSubscriptionsCalculator().concat()) {
- assertNotNull(subscription);
+
+ */
+package org.jclouds.cloudsigma2.domain;
+
+import javax.inject.Named;
+import java.beans.ConstructorProperties;
+import java.util.Date;
+
+/**
+ * @author Vladimir Shevchenko
+ */
+public class CalcSubscription {
+
+ public static class Builder {
+ private String amount;
Would it be possible to cut a new RC for 1.6.3 including this?
I'm -0 on this one. Would prefer to get 1.6.3 out of the door, focus
on a timely 1.7.0 and then spin a quick(er) 1.6.4 early next year. But
I think ultimately this is a decision for the release manager.
Over to you, Gaul ;-)
Second time around looks better. Still waiting on BuildHive, but otherwise +1
from me. Thanks, @ahgittin!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/43#issuecomment-29480601
===
Apache ID: andrewp
---
[X] +1 Release.
[ ] -1 Don't release (see notes).
---
Checklist
Does it make sense to move login statements from script builder to
compute? That would eliminate (i).
I don't know scriptbuilder too well, but I think if we really want to
decouple it we should take *all* hard-coded statements out of it and
make the script building engine a separate
+ @Named(discount_amount)
+ private final Double discountAmount;
+ @Named(discount_percent)
+ private final Double discountPercent;
+ private final String period;
+ private final Double price;
+ private final SubscriptionResource resource;
+ @Named(start_time)
+ private
+ private final Date endTime;
+
+ @ConstructorProperties({
+ amount, discount_amount, discount_percent, period, price,
resource, start_time, end_time
+ })
+ public CalcSubscription(@Nullable Double amount, @Nullable Double
discountAmount, @Nullable Double
+import java.util.List;
+
+import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkNotNull;
+
+/**
+ * @author Vladimir Shevchenko
+ */
+public class SubscriptionCalculator {
+ private final double price;
+ @Named(objects)
+ private final ListCalcSubscription subscriptions;
+
+
+ CloudSigma2Api api = requestSendsResponse(
+postBuilder()
+.endpoint(endpoint + subscriptioncalculator/)
+
.payload(payloadFromResourceWithContentType(/subscriptioncalculator-request.json
+ , MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON))
+
PS: Is this PR still supposed to be closed?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/44#issuecomment-29524935
Thanks, @sivikt! Just a quick heads-up that we're just wrapping up the 1.6.3
release of jclouds at present, so it might take a little longer to review your
PR...
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/44#issuecomment-29524922
@timur87: Looks like a real compilation error:
```
[INFO] -
[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR :
[INFO] -
[ERROR] bootstrap class path not set in conjunction with -source 1.6
Congrats and thanks to Andrew G. for cutting his first release!!
ap
101 - 200 of 1315 matches
Mail list logo
