Martin,
Apparently, those changes came in by error. So we need to evaluate
how that happened and how it can be prevented in the future. Accusing
co-contributors of being malicious or inconsiderate will certainly
not facilitate this effort.
So, please, (and I am minding my tone), who did these
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 11:52, Frank Petersf...@sun.com wrote:
Martin,
Apparently, those changes came in by error. So we need to evaluate
how that happened and how it can be prevented in the future. Accusing
co-contributors of being malicious or inconsiderate will certainly
not facilitate
2009/9/7 Frank Peters f...@sun.com:
Specifically, getting rid of the 6-blanks strings in the CWS should be
easy, assuming that there are no legitimate instances of such a thing.
Any such validation must be based on rules, we need to define so we do
not by accident fix bugs that are no bugs.
Hi Martin,
first: thanks for bringing the issue to the list - I share your
opinion, that these really hurt translators.
But a small side note ...
Original-Nachricht
An: dev@l10n.openoffice.org
...
Just a small regression from a translator's perspective. When you
stumble
Frank,
2009/9/7 Frank Peters f...@sun.com:
So, please, (and I am minding my tone), who did these changes? Who is
In what way do persons matter here?
Well, up until now this did not happen. Actually I do remember some
sporadic errors like added 6-blanks in the past year, maybe 5 of them
in
Martin,
2009/9/7 Frank Peters f...@sun.com:
So, please, (and I am minding my tone), who did these changes? Who is
In what way do persons matter here?
Well, up until now this did not happen. Actually I do remember some
sporadic errors like added 6-blanks in the past year, maybe 5 of them
in
Martin Srebotnjak wrote:
2009/9/7 Frank Peters f...@sun.com:
Specifically, getting rid of the 6-blanks strings in the CWS should be
easy, assuming that there are no legitimate instances of such a thing.
Any such validation must be based on rules, we need to define so we do
not by accident fix
As reported by Martin, Ain and others helpcontent2 introduced
numerous changes partly due to a bug in the creation tools and
partly due to communication issues. As far as I understood,
these changes affect the following:
1. Replacement of emph by item type=menuitem elements
2. Occurrence of
Martin Srebotnjak wrote:
This puzzles me and adds another type of error or unnecessary changes
m57 introduced. Namely, changes in m57 include also (regarding to
m56):
From:
image id=\img_id7261268\ src=\res/helpimg/border_ca_5.png\
width=\1.1354inch\ height=\0.25inch\alt
Hi Translators/Localizers,
On 09/07/09 14:50, Frank Peters wrote:
As reported by Martin, Ain and others helpcontent2 introduced
numerous changes partly due to a bug in the creation tools and
partly due to communication issues. As far as I understood,
these changes affect the following:
1.
Hi Frank
Yes I noticed all three issues you listed but I work with Pootle which
has M54 loaded and I just finished the job yesterday...
Some remarks
1) not sure I flagged this in M54.
2) I just ignored them as long as the content was consistent. I may have
taken a risk there, I dunno... But
Actually, the AD3 happened before (with some previous milestone), but
with m57 these {ENTER ALTERNATIVE...} English string parts might
have gotten replaced by Icon again. However, also icon sizes changed
in several spots.
Lp, m.
2009/9/7 Frank Peters f...@sun.com:
As reported by Martin, Ain and
Hi,
Original-Nachricht
Von: Rafaella Braconi rafaella.brac...@sun.com
We need to know if we should roll back the changes listed
above that were introduced with m57 (this does not apply
to the relevant content changes, just the changes
listed above).
I agree with
Hi Andre'
On 09/07/09 15:22, Andre Schnabel wrote:
Hi,
Original-Nachricht
Von: Rafaella Braconi rafaella.brac...@sun.com
We need to know if we should roll back the changes listed
above that were introduced with m57 (this does not apply
to the relevant content
2009/9/7 Olivier Hallot ohal...@scinergy.com.br:
Hi Frank
Yes I noticed all three issues you listed but I work with Pootle which has
M54 loaded and I just finished the job yesterday...
Now I understand why not many translators chimed in. If they would see
m57 in Pootle ... Well, Olivier, I am
Martin Srebotnjak wrote:
Frank et al.,
We need to know if we should roll back the changes listed
above that were introduced with m57 (this does not apply
to the relevant content changes, just the changes
listed above).
*It's important that we get feedback by tomorrow, or else
our deadline
16 matches
Mail list logo
