On 01/22/10 00:10, Martin Srebotnjak wrote:
Hello,
we discussed about this a lot on the road to 3.2. We were promised that
things like this would not happen again.
Well, I downloaded m70 sdf and updated the Slovenian translation (100% done
for 3.2) to it, and got some new, untranslated or
2010/1/22 Uwe Fischer uwe.fisc...@sun.com
the only helpcontent relevant changes in m70 came in from the CWS
printerpullpages. See issue 104335.
I cannot see any reason for changes in scalc/01 in that CWS, however. Why
did you look into those strings? Were they flagged as to be translated?
Hi,
Von: Uwe Fischer uwe.fisc...@sun.com
..
the only helpcontent relevant changes in m70 came in from the CWS
printerpullpages. See issue 104335.
Seems to be introduces with some earlier cws.
Diff between OOO320_m10.sdf and DEV300_m70.sdf include those changes (sorry for
long lines):
On 01/22/10 10:12, Andre Schnabel wrote:
Hi,
Von: Uwe Fischer uwe.fisc...@sun.com
.
the only helpcontent relevant changes in m70 came in from the CWS
printerpullpages. See issue 104335.
Seems to be introduces with some earlier cws.
Diff between OOO320_m10.sdf and DEV300_m70.sdf include
Hello,
we discussed about this a lot on the road to 3.2. We were promised that
things like this would not happen again.
Well, I downloaded m70 sdf and updated the Slovenian translation (100% done
for 3.2) to it, and got some new, untranslated or fuzzy strings, which
seemed normal.
Then I took a
