Hi William,
W dniu 2010-09-10 07:43, Thomas Lange pisze:
Hi William,
On 09.09.2010 18:53, William Colen wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to intercept when the user clicks ignore button?
I'm implementing usage feedback in Cogroo grammar checker, and know
when the
user ignore an error would be a very
functions in
Soros.
Regards
Marcin
Regards,
László
2009/8/29 Marcin Miłkowski milek...@o2.pl:
Hi Laci,
this is indeed very nice and quite easy to fix (even for Polish where it's
quite involved). Here's my bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/numbertext/+bug/421031
Regards
Marcin
Németh
Hi Laci,
this is indeed very nice and quite easy to fix (even for Polish where
it's quite involved). Here's my bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/numbertext/+bug/421031
Regards
Marcin
Németh László pisze:
Hi Sophie and Olivier,
I have updated the site, also with Olivier's patches for
Mathias Bauer pisze:
Marcin Miłkowski wrote:
Mathias Bauer pisze:
Marcin Miłkowski wrote:
Mathias Bauer pisze:
Russell Butler wrote:
Mathias Bauer wrote:
Thomas Lange - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote:
b) If you list is larger and especially if you want to provide that
word-list
LanguageTool 0.9.8 has just been released at www.languagetool.org. Some
of the changes include:
* Fixed a crash
* New rules for Italian
* Many new rules, a rule-based disambiguator and synthesiser for Romanian
* Initial support for Slovak
* Small fixes and additions for Polish and English
The
Hi all, and Thomas :)
I guess nobody else comments, as these things are highly technical, but
they're of interest to the list. So let me continue our exchange :)
[snip]
If want you meant here was chaining of grammar checkers than that
probably will never happen. Currently there is only one
is the status of the bundle in such a case).
Regards
Marcin
Regards,
Carlos Menezes
2009/3/16, Marcin Miłkowski milek...@o2.pl:
Andrea Pescetti pisze:
Daniel Naber wrote:
http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/features/3.1/ says: With
OpenOffice.org 3.1, the LanguageTool grammar checker is now also
Thomas Lange - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg pisze:
Hi,
I just found this in the English-US thesaurus:
dark has the antonym light, but light has the antonym heavy
Well, of course it isn't wrong. But maybe it is not what one would
expect either.
Thus, why is it this way? Does the thesaurus
ge pisze:
Hi, Jeje,
The munch and unmunch utilites help to get all valid words; you must provide
affix and dic file, and they create all valid words.
I am not sure, where they are located right now, they were part of myspell, that is now replaced by hunspell.
maybe http://hunspell.sf.net
Olivier R. pisze:
Hi,
I would like to understand how hunspell tries to suggest the right
spelling.
Here is some examples of the strange behaviour we get:
* example 1 *
_déterrer_ is the correct spelling of a verb (to dig up in English)
a. If I write: _détérer_
Hunspell suggests:
Hi,
note for other dictionary developers: in case of some languages, they
seem to use antiquated versions. For Polish, the dictionary seems to be
indeed veeery old (misses some 40 thousand entries from our current
release, so delta files are pretty mostly useless). So you might want to
ping
)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(Unknown Source)
... 14 more
Thanks
William
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Marcin Miłkowski wrote:
Mathias Bauer pisze
Hi,
the error you mention appears when you have some settings for the JRE in
OpenOffice. Click the JRE used in OOo, and remove any settings you have, close
OOo completely, restart and try again.
Best of luck,
Marcin
Dnia 29 stycznia 2009 15:45 David B Teague davidbtea...@verizon.net
:
Marcin Miłkowski wrote:
Hi,
Marcin
Hi Marcin
I will fetch Language Tool 0.9.6 again just to be sure there isn't
something strange about the download. This had happened with other
OO.o downloads, so this is not unprecedented.
I fetched the Language Tool again, with the same
Dnia 29 stycznia 2009 21:55 David B Teague davidbtea...@verizon.net
napisał(a):
Marcin Miłkowski wrote:
Hi,
Try to install some other Java-based extension, like Report Builder:
http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/project/reportdesign
If you're having problems
Hi William,
I have just made a wiki page with instructions for users:
http://languagetool.wikidot.com/removing-languagetool-0-9-5-from-openoffice-3-0-1
But this is not very user-friendly as data loss seems to be inevitable in many
cases. I have no easy procedure for saving unaffected settings
Bauer nospamfor...@gmx.de napisał(a):
Hi,
can you explain more deeply what the exact problem is? Is it a general
problem in our extensions infrastructure?
Regards,
Mathias
Marcin Miłkowski wrote:
Hi William,
I have just made a wiki page with instructions for users:
http
Mathias Bauer pisze:
Joachim Lingner wrote:
Thomas Lange - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg schrieb:
Hi,
Marcin Miłkowski wrote:
Hi,
the problem is that the Java API has changed. So our extension that used the
old API cannot find classes in new jars, and because of this fact you cannot
Hi,
they're not hidden, look again at these grey things on the screen.
The best thing to do is to log all paragraph text to a text file and
compare two versions. OOo sends standard hard spaces, soft hyphens and
field codes (Unicode 0x01, 0x02). These are counted as normal chars in
positions.
Hi,
let me say it again: never return a null.
One more thing: my implementation uses a trivial mechanism to make sure
that there is only one instance of the service (I would have to store
the state on disk otherwise). If your implementation is stateless, you
might have many instances, but in
CARLOS EDUARDO DANTAS DE MENEZES pisze:
Thomas,
We are trying to debug new version of CoGrOO (3.0.2) but it sounds a
bit difficult.
mene...@possante:~$ /opt/broffice.org3/program/soffice -writer
terminate called after throwing an instance of
'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException'
sh:
Jean-Christophe Helary pisze:
On mercredi 07 janv. 09, at 08:42, Marcin Miłkowski wrote:
If you have to create frequency lists very frequently, then maybe it
could make some sense to create such an extension that you describe.
What would be the use of the frequency list?
Glossary creation
William Colen pisze:
Thank you Thomas,
I could figure it out. At that time, my grammar checker wasn't working and I
was trying to find what was going wrong.
Cogroo still not working with OOo 3.0.1. The OOo Writer crashes just after I
press F7, and the automatic checking is not working. I'm
what a
word is ...
Harold Fuchs
London, England
Please reply *only* to dev@lingucomponent.openoffice.org
On 06/01/2009 02:18, Marcin Miłkowski wrote:
Save as text file, and run this awk script on it from command line
(gawk -f scriptfile filename.txt):
--
# Print list of word
Save as text file, and run this awk script on it from command line (gawk
-f scriptfile filename.txt):
--
# Print list of word frequencies
{
for (i = 1; i = NF; i++)
freq[$0]++
}
END {
for (word in freq)
printf %s\t%d\n, word,
Kevin Atkinson pisze:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Marcin Mi?kowski wrote:
who is responsible now for maintaining the official en_US dictionary
for OOo? There is an extension on the extension website but it's a
bit older than the version distributed with
Kevin Atkinson pisze:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Marcin Mikowski wrote:
Kevin Atkinson pisze:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Marcin Mi?kowski wrote:
who is responsible now for maintaining the official en_US
dictionary for OOo? There is an extension on the
Hi,
who is responsible now for maintaining the official en_US dictionary for
OOo? There is an extension on the extension website but it's a bit older
than the version distributed with OOo, so it cannot be considered an
update (it also has a wrong version scheme). Ideally, the extension
Hi,
without telling us *what* problems you are experiencing it sounds as if
you're telling the doctor: I'm sick, what medicine will you give me?.
Please be specific :)
Note that the Spelling and Grammar checking dialog box has a special
check box for enabling grammar checking in the dialog
Hi,
I've found a bug with 3.0 RC3 - if you install a dictionary extension
for a language that is already supported by a bundled dictionary pack
(for example, Russian in Polish build), there is an immediate crash,
even if the node names for dictionaries are different in .xcu files:
Jancs pisze:
Hi, Olivier!
Quoting Olivier R. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I haven't tried it much, but this might be what you're looking for:
http://dicollecte.free.fr
I am the author of this website.
The code is still unavailable, for I want to implement new features and
I have to chase after
uỹ
REP ỏa oả
REP ỏe oẻ
REP ủy uỷ
REP ọa oạ
REP ọe oẹ
REP ụy uỵ
REP uo ườ
REP uo ướ
REP uo ưỡ
REP uo ưở
REP uo ượ
REP ch tr
REP d gi
REP dz d
REP f ph
REP g gh
REP gh g
REP gi d
REP ng ngh
REP ngh ng
REP s x
REP tr ch
REP x s
Many thanks.
Ivan Garcia.
Marcin Miłkowski wrote:
Iván García
Hi,
I don't know the exact answer, but:
1) it might take some time to read a long and complicated dictionary
(disk access time + processing, for example Hebrew needs quite a long time)
2) you might instantiate the class at the start of the program, and then
keep the instance for later use.
Iván García pisze:
Currently in our Vietnamese hunspell dictionary (for firefox and
Openoffice), if we misspell đường as đừong , we get three suggestions:
đừ ong (adding space, 1 operation)
đong (removing ừ , 1 operation)
đừng (removing o , 1 operation)
actually we'd like the system to
Michel Weimerskirch pisze:
Sorry for sending a second mail, but I forgot to add: same question
for the autocorrection data.
You can pack autocorrection data with the extension but I wouldn't do
this because the user cannot really edit the autocorrect list - on every
update, the list will be
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Lange - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg pisze:
For simple Grammar checker implementation that does not use a new thread
to get the result you can look up the file grammarchecker.cxx in linguistic.
How do other parts of OOo code know they should add themselves as
listeners? I
Michel Weimerskirch pisze:
Hi
I have been playing around with the morphological analysis features of
hunspell(*). Has anyone investigated if and how the PoS data
associated to a hunspell wordlist could be used for a grammar checker?
Yes and no ;)
I mean I've built a Polish tagger using a
Jancs pisze:
Quoting Marcin Miłkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm still planning to start a major rewrite of affix flag / tagging
rules as the Polish hunspell source has been significantly cleared up
(it contained many duplicates in terms of flags creating the same PoS
tag and the same affix
Michel Weimerskirch pisze:
Thank you Marcin and Janis for your comments.
I have been rebuilding the wordlist for Luxembourgish from scratch for
the last few months. It will be released in a few weeks. Most of the
words are arranged in separate lists like adjectives, nouns, etc.
and the affix
Hi Mathias,
Mathias Bauer wrote:
The checker should implement the XGrammarChecker interface, and define
its abilities this way. OK. The checking process would be started with
doGrammarChecking() method. OK. But here goes what I don't understand.
Suppose I found some errors with my code, and
Hi all,
I'm trying to understand the new API from the point of view of the
grammar checker developer (unfortunately, the docs are written from the
opposite point of view).
So far I got this (I'm using Java, so Java API names follow):
The checker should implement the XGrammarChecker
Hi,
you'd need as well to convert these document to pure text in order to
process them; you can try to spawn OOo for conversion in a batch mode
but the easier option is to use unzip in a script, and take content.xml
only from the files. Then process the files using awk (define the field
ge pisze:
My overall impression is, that TM is a toothless helper, it helps in
fact very little, and forces usage of additional tools.
For an individual translator, it can be of little help if the text
doesn't contain many repetitions. For a group, it helps to sustain
consistency of
Mathias Bauer pisze:
I call it a Proof reading tool as the Language Tool at the same time
does less than some well known Grammar Checkers but OTOH does also more.
I like this term. This way it's more clear to the users what they can
expect (and they can expect it from most so-called grammar
Lars Aronsson pisze:
How can I create a minimal grammar? Is there an independent
command-line program (similar to the hunspell program for spell
checking) that can be used for testing the grammar?
There is no built-in grammar checker in OOo. You can reuse one of the
grammar-checking
ge pisze:
If the rules check position of word types in the sentence
(e.g. verb, noun, adj, adv, ...), then besides the rules
also a dicionary is necessary containing the word type
for each word.
To set up such a dictionary is not trivial.
True, but Lars was asking only about starting the
Hi,
there is some preliminary support for Spanish in LanguageTool
(www.languagetool.org). You can contact me for any details.
Regards,
Marcin
Kepa R. pisze:
Hallo,
I would like to help in the development of a free
grammar checker for Spanish. Are there more people
working on that?
Best
Mathias Bauer pisze:
Marcin Miłkowski wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to have AutoCorrect items installable as an extension for
a particular language? If AutoText is installable, then maybe
AutoCorrect as well?
I'm not sure about this. You can check this by yourself by adding
additional folders
Mathias Bauer pisze:
I tried and it works. The entries are changeable but this is a feature
for me (after all, you might want to customize the autocorrect). I will
post a skeleton to the wiki, and some files for Polish users :)
I think changeable entries in an extension are a hairy thing.
Hi,
is it possible to have AutoCorrect items installable as an extension for
a particular language? If AutoText is installable, then maybe
AutoCorrect as well?
Thanks for any tip,
Marcin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hristo Hristov pisze:
On 8.10.2007, Mathias Bauer wrote:
Hristo Simenov Hristov wrote:
Hi,
A lot of people complain that when they install new version of OOo they
have to install our dictionaries again. Is it possible to be done
something? For example in language packages (isntall) to add
Hristo Hristov pisze:
On 4.10.2007, Simon Brouwer wrote:
The problem with many available dictionaries is that their license is not
compatible with OOo, e.g. GPL. That means you can use them with OOo, by
separately downloading them, but they cannot be made a part of it.
Well,
when I install
Simon Brouwer pisze:
I did *not* say that it's not a problem to include a dictionary if its
license is compatible.
If most dictionaries would be LGPL or otherwise compatibly licensed, it
would still be undesirable to bundle them all. That would significantly
bloat the install package, while
Hi Ruud,
r.j.baars pisze:
L.S.
Is one of the specialists out here able to point out a location where I
can find information on integrating Hunspell in C or java applications?
Use our mailing list archive to find my posts on Java ports of
Hunspell/myspell. There are at least three of them.
Mathias Bauer pisze:
Nicolas Mailhot schrieb:
That's completely true on the 'no building or packaging' side. On the
'just give access' side, distributors prefer regular versioned archive
dumps on an ftp/http:
OK, I will put this information into the ongoing discussion about
possible changes
Nicolas Mailhot pisze:
Le Dim 30 septembre 2007 20:34, Harri Pitkänen a écrit :
- We do not have an OOo macro for sending suggestions, but I think it
is a great idea.
IMHO this is a terrible idea. A web form can be integrated in the
translation/i18n/l10n web hubs big distributions like
Harri Pitkänen pisze:
On Monday 01 October 2007, Mathias Bauer wrote:
So are you planning to ask for replacing hunspell as OOo spell checker
by your new spell checker?
No, our plan is to continue doing what we already do: ship
openoffice.org-voikko as an extension that provides spell checker
Nicolas Mailhot pisze:
If SUN and/or OO.o wanted to move hunspell dicts to a neutral ground, in
the hope of getting people not interested in OO.o to contribute, I'd
advise targeting freedesktop.org. But for this move to succeed the
contribution should include manpower to make the project
Nicolas Mailhot pisze:
[for people interested in flames]
OK, let's stop the flame, right? Let me snip therefore most of our
sophisticated insults ;)
A. an authoritative download source (ftp or http directory)
There are OOo mirrors with most stuff that is put on the wiki.
And
Hi Robert,
Robert Ludvik pisze:
In just a few words: people can send words, that are not yet in spell
check dictionary trough a web form or with a help of a macro, which is
for now only available for OOo but could be ported to MSO, KOffice(?).
Relevant people (linguists) would then review sent
Simon Brouwer pisze:
Sure, if you have this menu option. But it appears that the OOo flavour
bundled in some Linux distributions (at least OpenSuSE) doesn't include
the DicOOo wizard and therefore also not this menu option.
I've been reported that Fedora also hasn't bundled DicOOo into their
Nicolas Mailhot pisze:
So instead of wasting energy pretending the linguistic project with its
few spell-checkers knows better the distribution job that distros which
have been at it for years and update systems from the kernel to the UI
theme, if OO.o could focus on getting its material in a
Nicolas Mailhot pisze:
Le samedi 29 septembre 2007 à 19:07 +0200, Marcin Miłkowski a écrit :
Nicolas Mailhot pisze:
So instead of wasting energy pretending the linguistic project with its
few spell-checkers knows better the distribution job that distros which
have been at it for years
Laurent Godard pisze:
Hi Frank
any opinion ?
where to look in the sources ?
sw/source/core/txtnode/txtedt.cxx, search for 'rWord.Len() 1'
thanks a lot
any planned impact ? what about punctuations as noticed by thomas
Well, this can slow down the spell-checking process a little. I'm not
Hi Alan,
I don't think it's the reason. Polish dictionary file is about 4 MB and
it loads fast (however the affix file is about 200K). Check it yourself.
However, it's not UTF-8 - it's ISO-8859-2. Maybe UTF-8 makes it slower?
Regards,
Marcin
Alan Yaniger napisał(a):
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for
Hi Graham,
Warned? about what? If the Wordnet list is Opensource then what is the
issue?
I understood you want to start from _scratch_. Wordnet was sponsored by
a 20-million USD grant, and done by a team of really qualified
linguists. And it is one of the biggest achievements in computer
Hi Graham,
Graham Lauder napisał(a):
2. Contact the Wordnet people and ask them if there's a way to contribute
Commonwealth words in a way they are marked in the data, i.e. they can be
filtered out for those who don't want them.
2 is clearly the better solution. Thanks for your offer to host
Hi all,
it seems to be a big misunderstanding here: My Thesaurus isn't a server
software and you really cannot setup it on any web server. What you can
do, however, to edit thesauruses, is to install Open Thesaurus (see
www.openthesaurus.de) which is used successfully to prepare OOo
messages
(or something) to Italian. So please contact me in private if you want
to help :)
Hopefully, this would attract more attention from people that need some
more sophisticated spelling or grammar rules for Italian.
Regards,
Marcin Miłkowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a):
You speak about your solution.
What is it? Is it a morphological analysis tool or a grammar checker?
Dictionary-based POS-tagger for LanguageTool, using finite-state
automata format for storing data (one of the most efficient dictionary
formats, in terms of
Hi William,
in its current state, hunspell has some limitations which make this
solution imperfect. First, in some languages only all flags of the base
form of the word determine the part of speech information (two genders
can share the same affixes, for example). Hunspell is unable to
Hi Eleonora,
For English position in sentence analysers are the tool of choice
(because lots of verbs are substantives, e.g
walk
play, etc...)
For POS-tagging this is the tool of choice but not so for grammar
checking. We had a statistical sentence-level POS tagger in LanguageTool
but it
Mathias Bauer napisał(a):
Laurent Godard schrieb:
One goal would be to use a multi-path for user/wordbook and
share/wordbook. Another would be to resolve the conflict of
user-dictionaries and downloadable dictionaries in user/wordbook,
especially since both of them happen to use the same file
Hi Matthias,
thanks for pointing this out. Polish hyphenation patterns have a README,
and I've just added the missing pointers to the original LeX/MeX patterns:
http://pl.openoffice.org/pliki/README_hyph_pl_PL.txt
As a leader of Polish NLC project, I get asked personally about three
times a
Hi,
I found out there are request in French community to have a hard space
before the exclamation mark and the question mark. Now, the French
autocorrect rules do not have it, but this is extremely easy to add. So
my question is: who maintains the autocorrect rules so that I could send
the
Hi Sophie,
Thanks for this.
Well, actually, I was too optimistic. My patch inserts a hard space
after a space, so it's not really a solution :((( But there is some
hope. First of all, I will encode this rule into LanguageTool (we
already have some basic support for French). And the vlnka
Hi all,
some of you could find my recent experiments interesting. I posted them
here:
http://morfologik.blogspot.com/2007/01/wikipedia-history-diff-as-revision.html
In short, it seems that Lars' idea was brilliant, and it is possible to
filter out the edit wars using simple metrics. Prepare
Hi Eleonora
Does Polish support compund words?
Yes, there are some.
If yes, how intensively?
(English also supports them, e.g. rainbow, raincoat,
however, it is very reserved in their usage).
The only examples of compound words are words like autoformat
autoformatowanie (autoformat),
Jonathan wrote:
Lars wrote:
One idea for finding stats on errors is to compare changes made to
Wikipedia articles. The complete text revision history is
That might make a good corpus.
Would it be possible to write a script that picks up just the
spelling/grammar changes? If not, you'll be
Simon Brouwer napisał(a):
Hi,
Is it possible to run Hunspell in a standalone mode, feeding it a list
of words and obtaining a file that contains the spell check results and
suggestions for these words?
Of course. See http://hunspell.sourceforge.net
Regards,
Marcin
Hi Robert,
Thanks for your reply. Yes, I've looked at that page,
but the instructions at Download and test your affix
file and dictionary using the Hunspell stand-alone
realease doens't say much, and when I downloaded the
stand-alone release I couldn't see how to get it to
work in Windows. I
Dear Dmitri,
have a look on hunspell website, try to find jmorph (Java version of
hunmorph which uses hunspell dictionaries, I guess). It seems to me
there are some programs that interface myspell dictionaries in Java.
This could be adapted to OmegaT more easily but you'll need to search
Bruno Sant'Anna wrote:
So do you think that both methods can be put In API (provide sentence
and paragraphs) ?
The grammar checker itself choses the best way to him?
Do you agree that enabling paragraph method we have the language problem
right? This is a thing I worry about...
Well, I
Bruno Sant'Anna wrote:
I know splitting the
paragraph into sentences is not trivial but I sincerely think that this
way is better than sending the full paragraph when we are dealing with
more than one language.
Why not using the language attribute for decided which grammar checker
should
Matthew Strawbridge wrote):
I once noticed when toying with the MS grammar checker that if there are
too many errors in a text (e.g. because the language attribute is
inappropriate) it displays a message like too much errors encountered.
Maybe it is foreign text... and stops grammar checking
Daniel Naber wrote:
9-) If the grammar checker find an error the complete sentence is marked
as it has an error. (Not just a piece of sentence has errors).
Does that mean the whole sentence would be underlined? I guess not, as that
wouldn't make sense.
+1
I also made a comment directly on
Jonathon Blake wrote:
Bruno wrote:
we can create a unified dictionary but this implies modification in
spell checker.
Au Gramadoir uses a different type of spell checker.
Language Tool uses another type of spell checker.
Language Tool in its current version (0.8.2) does not use any spell
Hi Daniel and Simon,
Daniel Naber wrote:
On Freitag 26 Mai 2006 18:57, Simon Brouwer wrote:
It would be great if
the relevant data for the grammar checker would be easy to generate from
a list of such word groups.
It's easy to write such rules in LanguageTool. For example, this of cause
Checker how many registers and which
registers it actually supports). Now, should the register list be
defined generally for all languages or set by a grammar checker for a
particular language? Hard to say which is best.
Best regards,
Marcin Miłkowski (developing a Polish checker
Jancs napisał(a):
Hi!
Can i ask someone to help me out with the design of the OO macro having the
following functionality:
it checks opened document (word by word, f.e.) against the dic of document
language and writes words, which are not found in the dic, to the separate
file.
If the file
can simply implement a best-bet algorithm to show only one form
without distracting the user too much.
Best regards,
Marcin Miłkowski
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Laurent Godard wrote:
As huspell is designed as an addon and there is a need of an intensive
and systematic verification of all existing dictionaries, i would
propose this:
- deliver it as an addon, officially supported by the lingucomponent
project or the comming scripting one.
One thing
Laurent Godard napisał(a):
Obviously, Hunspell has to become the default engine as it replies to a
need
is Hunspell actually ready to be integrated ?
Agree, we have to do a testing campaign; the first step of offering it
as an addon would be OK: end-users of non-Unicode languages won't
Hi Subir,
check out hunspell.sourceforge.net. Hunspell supports multibyte
characters so there should be no problem, and it probably will replace
myspell. Contact Laszlo Nemeth at [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the developer of
hunspell) for more information. He is supposed to replace Kevin as well.
Daniel Naber wrote:
The thesaurus would benefit from code that can find the base form for any
word. E.g. walked - walk, children - child. This could be plugged into
the existing thesaurus code easily, it's basically just one method like
getBaseform(String). Of course it would need to support
Laurent Godard wrote:
Also, would it be possible to provide style information to the grammar
checker (so it gets XML instead of plain text)? Users might want to
set up rules that check, for example, that certain keywords are always
bold or that latin terms appear in italics. This might also be
96 matches
Mail list logo
