Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

Hi, Just wondering what happened to this idea: http://www.nabble.com/2.1-Design-and-Process-tf1617559.html#a4383722 Cheers, Rahul Jesse McConnell wrote: hi everyone, I have been trying to help emmanuel some with pulling together the roadmap for Continuum 1.1 on the wiki and maybe help

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

it disappeared into the ether of the mailing list? :) I still think its a good idea, thanks for bringing it back up...could be very useful on some of the larger issues like security and project groups, etc.. jesse On 7/12/06, Rinku [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Just wondering what happened

[repost: review request] Re: MJAR-28 Advice from dev: Mainfest.mf/Class-Path entries by MavenArchiver, Assembly and Jar

Reposting to request someone with MavenArchiver, Assembly and Jar dev experience to provide some guidance on which is the correct direction so I can file a patch. Cheers Bae - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: Please review javadoc plugin documentation

A staging site is now available at http://people.apache.org/~oching/maven-javadoc-plugin http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/maven-javadoc-plugin Thanks :) Richard van der Hoff wrote: Maria Odea Ching wrote: Okay, will do :) Thanks.. Could you also fix your clock? It seems to be set for

Re: Listeners for build events

Thanks for your response. Glad to hear that a listener based approach is a viable solution. I have already obtained the source from Subversion trunk and will begin looking at implementing such an approach. Any thoughts on the events people may want to listen on? -- View this message in

Re: Listeners for build events

Ahmed Omarjee wrote: Thanks for your response. Glad to hear that a listener based approach is a viable solution. I have already obtained the source from Subversion trunk and will begin looking at implementing such an approach. Any thoughts on the events people may want to listen on? Are

Re: Listeners for build events

Agreed. Just to confirm that this listener based approach is indepedent of the current notifiers based approach with respect to its intended use. (not necessarily drastically different with respect to implementation). -- View this message in context:

J2EE killer: For multi module builds CLASSPATH != resolved dependencies

Hi developers, after working now for some time with M2, we run really in troubles with the M2 setup here. We use a company wide super POM and have a lot of multi module projects. Now after releasing some of the artifacts, we run into big trouble, since we had to detect, that the CLASSPATH does

[M1] maven-eclipse-plugin 1.11 creates phantom sources attachement

Hello, I'm using maven1.1 and latest eclipse plugin (1.11). Plugin downloads sources and creates sources attachement in my eclipse classpath. Some libs have no source jars available, so downloading the sources.jar fails, but the generated .classpath has a source reference to this

Re: [M1] maven-eclipse-plugin 1.11 creates phantom sources attachement

I've found it myself on MPECLIPSE-118 Is there a snapshot for the 1.11.1 maven-eclipse-plugin ? Nicolas De Loof a écrit : Hello, I'm using maven1.1 and latest eclipse plugin (1.11). Plugin downloads sources and creates sources attachement in my eclipse classpath. Some libs have no source

Re: Problem with the new plugin plugin: missing parameters from parent mojo

Brett Porter wrote: Thanks - is it definitely the inheritence? If so, that's a bug. No, it's not the inheritance. I spoke too soon. There are two other factors: - a bug that meant a parameter without expression didn't appear (I committed Edwin's fix yesterday, but didn't deploy a snapshot)

Re: Please review the documentation for the maven-jar-plugin

I did that yesterday, before posting this to the list. Can't you see my change? Edwin Punzalan wrote: Also, can you please update this page: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Maven+Plugin+Documentation Thanks. ^_^ Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi all I have finished going over the

Re: Review Javadoc Plugin Documentation

Thanks :) Btw, a staging site is already available at http://people.apache.org/~oching/maven-javadoc-plugin http://people.apache.org/%7Eoching/maven-javadoc-plugin Mike Perham wrote: Done. -Original Message- From: Maria Odea Ching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 11,

Please review maven source plugin documentation

Hi Everyone, The documentation for the source plugin is now ready for review :) Thanks, Odea - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Error building plugins

Hi I am trying to build the plugins, but I am getting an error that indicates that there must be an error in one of the pom's: [INFO] The projects in the reactor contain a cyclic reference: Edge between 'Vertex{label='org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-jxr-plugin'}' and

Problem Accessing docck Plugin

I have seen references to the docck plugin floating around the list and thought I would give it a try to see what it does. When I tried to reference it on the command line, I got some strange output [1]. What surprised me was that it resolved the version to a snapshot and tried to get it from

Maven 2.1 - Optional dependencies, exclude all ...

Hi guys, Yesterday, during the explanation of the roadmap of maven 2.1 in the meeting Maven day, Jason said that a new setting will be supported to exclude all the transitive dependencies. I had effectively see numerous users that were complaining about the big exclusion list they have to

Re: J2EE killer: For multi module builds CLASSPATH != resolved dependencies

In MNG-2424, you say it may be related to MNG-1245 which is now fixed. Does that correct that issue? There have been some classspath related archiver fixes that might help with MEJB-18. Would fixing both of these resolve your issue? - Brett On 12/07/2006 6:23 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: Hi

Re: Problem with the new plugin plugin: missing parameters from parent mojo

Yep, that's right. I'll push up a snapshot now. On 12/07/2006 7:33 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: Brett Porter wrote: Thanks - is it definitely the inheritence? If so, that's a bug. No, it's not the inheritance. I spoke too soon. There are two other factors: - a bug that meant a parameter

RE: J2EE killer: For multi module builds CLASSPATH != resolved dependencies

Brett Porter wrote on Wednesday, July 12, 2006 2:18 PM: In MNG-2424, you say it may be related to MNG-1245 which is now fixed. Does that correct that issue? I don't know. I have too less knowledge about the classpath generation in Maven and how it is related to the dependencies - escpecially

RE: J2EE killer: For multi module builds CLASSPATH != resolved dependencies

To test MNG-1245 you can just replace your maven-project-2.0.4.jar in MAVEN_HOME/lib with the SNAPSHOT I attached to the issue and see if the issue goes away or changes. -Original Message- From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 8:07 AM To: Maven

RE: General issue with clover plugin requiring creative thinking...

Hi Jesse, -Original Message- From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: mardi 11 juillet 2006 14:57 To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: General issue with clover plugin requiring creative thinking... If it's a matter of sharing information maybe the ability to store

Re: Problem Accessing docck Plugin

Allison, Bob wrote: I have seen references to the docck plugin floating around the list and thought I would give it a try to see what it does. When I tried to reference it on the command line, I got some strange output [1]. What surprised me was that it resolved the version to a snapshot and

What's the status of maven-changes-plugin, currently in the sandbox?

Hi Every now and then users are having trouble using the changes plugin. After the move from mojo there has not been any release of the changes plugin. The last version published from mojo was 2.0-beta-1. The current version at Apache, according to the pom in the sandbox, is 2.0-beta-2. What

[proposal] Maven 2.1 Design Topics

Hi everyone, I guess it's fairly obvious from some of the advanced discussions going on in this list that we're starting to think a little more seriously about writing Maven 2.1. I think it's a bad idea for us to attempt another massive release (akin to 2.0) that attempts to fix everything

Re: Please review javadoc plugin documentation

Maria Odea Ching wrote: Hi Everyone, I've made some changes in the javadoc plugin docs. Could someone please review it? :-) Thanks, Odea I've read through the docs and here are some comments: All - The title for all pages is Maven Javadoc Report, but all references in the text refers to

Re: git repository provider

I just fixed the patch. It now runs with version 1.0-SNAPSHOT. Regards, Dominik

Re: [proposal] Maven 2.1 Design Topics

Alternative component support would be a big win for maven 2.1 on the OSGi/Eclipse bundle front. I look forward to hopefully contributing in this area. Wb On 7/12/06, John Casey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, ... * Alternative Component Support In order to flex to meet the

Re: Please review maven-idea-plugin documentation

Edwin Punzalan wrote: I've just finished updating the documentation for the maven-idea-plugin. Your feedback is highly appreciated. Thanks. Here are my comments: All - IntelliJ Idea - IntelliJ IDEA and Idea - IDEA in lots of places. Search for it. index.html - The IDEA Plugin has four

Re: Review of install plugin

Allan Ramirez wrote: Hi everyone, Just updated the docs of the install plugin. I hope you dont mind if you take a look and give me some feedback about it. Thanks Cheers, allan Here are my comments: site.xml - Missing the Goals link in the overview section. **/*.html - Remove the text

Default Filtered Resources Directory

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, I read about the Super-POM at: http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-pom.html My question is now, if it was possible to add an additional resources directory that is filtered. It would not hurt anybody if he does

Re: Please review maven source plugin documentation

Maria Odea Ching wrote: Hi Everyone, The documentation for the source plugin is now ready for review :) Thanks, Odea My comments: faq.html - Use the source:test-jar to - Use the source:test-jar goal to examples/configureplugin.html - To customize the configuration of the plugin - To

Re: [proposal] Maven 2.1 Design Topics

On 7/13/06, Wendell Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alternative component support would be a big win for maven 2.1 on the OSGi/Eclipse bundle front. I look forward to hopefully contributing in this area. +1 here. There have been more than one email chain on the user lists with people

maven dependecies

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, Maven2 really rocks! I figured out a way to build a plugin that allows solaris as packaging and builds a solaris package for a maven project. Therefore I add the complete static content of the package to the main/resources. Further I have

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

hi everyone, I have been trying to help emmanuel some with pulling together the roadmap for Continuum 1.1 on the wiki and maybe help organize some of the discussions on there. I wanted to get out the url to the wiki roadmap and maybe see how you guys feel about the content on it. I tried to

Re: Please review the documentation for the maven-jar-plugin

Thanks for the review Edwin. Which place are you referring to? Edwin Punzalan wrote: I think I remember that we should be using Maven instead of Maven 2. Aside from that, everything's just great. ^_^ Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi all I have finished going over the documentation for the

how to use freshly compiled surefire junit runner

Hi all, i can compile the surefire sources from svn (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/surefire/trunk) and run mvn install succesfully to get it into the local repository: [INFO] Installing D:\maven\surefire-trunk\surefire-providers\surefire-junit\target\surefire-junit-2.

Layout of multiproject projects

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, I have a complex maven project that goes down to 3 levels of POM inheritance (= it has sub-sub-projects). I am not really sure about what the suggested layout is: TREE: trunk/ trunk/foo-project/pom.xml

Re: how to use freshly compiled surefire junit runner

you will need fetch maven-surefire-plugin source and makesure it uses the surefire components snapshot ( mostlikely it is already done so) after that new binary kicks in automatically try mvn -X -Dan On 7/12/06, berndq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, i can compile the surefire sources

Re: how to use freshly compiled surefire junit runner

User question. Please post it to the users list. BTW, did you try: dependency groupIdorg.apache.maven.surefire/groupId artifactIdsurefire-junit/artifactId version2.1-SNAPSHOT/version /dependency Cheers, Vincent 2006/7/12, berndq [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all, i can compile the

Plugins can't be built!

Hi all Someone seems to have broken something in the trunk. A lot of plugins are failing in continuum. They all have similar error messages. Does anyone know what might be wrong? I get the same error when I try to build the plugins locally. I'm not sure if this is true for all plugins, but

Re: how to use freshly compiled surefire junit runner

dan tran wrote: you will need fetch maven-surefire-plugin source and makesure it uses the surefire components snapshot ( mostlikely it is already done so) after that new binary kicks in automatically that worked, thanks! Bernd try mvn -X -Dan On 7/12/06, berndq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: how to use freshly compiled surefire junit runner

Vincent Siveton wrote: User question. Please post it to the users list. ok, sorry, was not sure where to post. BTW, did you try: dependency groupIdorg.apache.maven.surefire/groupId artifactIdsurefire-junit/artifactId version2.1-SNAPSHOT/version /dependency did not help, but

Re: Plugins can't be built!

Hi, I have seen this one ... long time ago! Can you rename/remove the folder that maps to org.apache.maven groupId in your local repo, and try building again. I think its coming from an old version of a library Cheers, Rahul Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi all Someone seems to have broken

Re: Plugins can't be built!

I went back and checked my session to see what happened just before things stopped working. Here's what I found: Downloading: http://svn.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/maven/maven-plugin-tools-java/2.0.5-SNAPSHOT/maven-plugin-tools-java-2.0.5-20060712.135652-2.jar 10K

Re: Layout of multiproject projects

The TREE layout is recommended... the plugins are laid-out flat bec they are all plugins which means they all have a single parent. No use for a sub-parent for now... but there have been talks of categorizing the plugins which maybe a good cause for sub-parents with their own children.

Re: Please review the documentation for the maven-jar-plugin

The Introduction (index.html) have two. Dennis Lundberg wrote: Thanks for the review Edwin. Which place are you referring to? Edwin Punzalan wrote: I think I remember that we should be using Maven instead of Maven 2. Aside from that, everything's just great. ^_^ Dennis Lundberg

Re: Plugins can't be built!

I remember submitting patches to maven-plugin-tools-java and maven-plugin-tools-api to reformat the plugin parameter pages... those updates could be them. ^_^ Dennis Lundberg wrote: I went back and checked my session to see what happened just before things stopped working. Here's what I

Re: maven dependecies

Hi, congratulations on your work with Maven 2.0... I'm not sure if I understand your questions(s) correctly... so I'm just going to point you to jira. It holds the future features aside from bugs, so if you see the feature you want there, then you can vote for it. Otherwise, you can create

Re: Please review maven-idea-plugin documentation

hahaha nice catches especially on the number of goals ^_^ I'll update them... thanks. Dennis Lundberg wrote: Edwin Punzalan wrote: I've just finished updating the documentation for the maven-idea-plugin. Your feedback is highly appreciated. Thanks. Here are my comments: All - IntelliJ

[jira] Subscription: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Evangelism

Issue Subscription Filter: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Evangelism (25 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MEV-392 bad dependencies in commons-logging-1.1.pom http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MEV-392 MEV-296 Activemq-core (and other activemq projects)

[jira] Subscription: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Uploads

Issue Subscription Filter: Outstanding Repository Maintenance: Uploads (8 issues) Subscriber: mavendevlist Key Summary MAVENUPLOAD-986jsontools-log4j-1.2 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-986 MAVENUPLOAD-985jsontools-core-1.2

Re: Plugins can't be built!

This shouldn't have broken - needs investigation. A while back, we agreed to add a feature to 2.0.5 (the implementation attribute). The plugin plugin was updated to use the new tools and such. However, it also has a prereq of maven 2.0.5, so maven 2.0.4 and below which give this error

Re: Default Filtered Resources Directory

I think this has already been suggested in JIRA, but if not it is worth adding. - Brett On 13/07/2006 7:48 AM, Joerg Hohwiller wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, I read about the Super-POM at:

HTTP compression (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-55)

I tried posting this to the WAGON mailing list, but there doesn't seem to be any activity over there... I've posted some attachments to the JIRA issue WAGON-55 [1] to implement support for accepting GZip-based compression with HTTP GETs for HTTP and WebDAV. I'm hoping these simple changes can

Re: Review of install plugin

Hi Dennis, Thanks for the comments. will fix immediately. allan Dennis Lundberg wrote: Allan Ramirez wrote: Hi everyone, Just updated the docs of the install plugin. I hope you dont mind if you take a look and give me some feedback about it. Thanks Cheers, allan Here are my comments:

Re: Continuum 1.1 roadmap

rahul and I chatted last night on irc a bit and I cobbled this together as an example using the Security page that carlos put together and the mailing list thread.. http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUM/CPSI+-+Security+Model so, does anyone see the value in this more formal approach? I

Re: svn commit: r421484 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-plugin-plugin/pom.xml

and the prereq Is there anything on trunk that isn't on the branch? - Brett On 13/07/2006 12:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: epunzalan Date: Wed Jul 12 19:54:18 2006 New Revision: 421484 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=421484view=rev Log: updating the deps to 2.1-SNAPSHOT

RE: J2EE killer: For multi module builds CLASSPATH != resolved dependencies

Hi Mike Brett, Mike Perham wrote on Wednesday, July 12, 2006 3:18 PM: To test MNG-1245 you can just replace your maven-project-2.0.4.jar in MAVEN_HOME/lib with the SNAPSHOT I attached to the issue and see if the issue goes away or changes. Great. Both issues are also resolved with this

RE: [proposal] Maven 2.1 Design Topics

John Casey wrote on Wednesday, July 12, 2006 10:41 PM: [snip] ** POM Loading / Building - Running Away from XPP3 [snip] What's wrong with XPP3? - Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,