MASSEMBLY-561: Encoding issue with assembly filtering

2011-09-27 Thread Julien HENRY
Hi, Sorry for the insistence, but could someone have a look at my patch for MASSEMBLY-561. John Casey started to look at the patch but seems he is busy. We have users that are forced to use a custom released version of m-assembly-p and I wouldn’t like this situation to stay as it is. Thanks

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.10

2011-09-27 Thread Tony Chemit
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:26:06 -0500 Paul Gier pg...@apache.org wrote: +1 (non binding) Works fine for your projects. Tony. Hi, We solved 8 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=17431 There are still lots of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.10

2011-09-27 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Paul Gier pg...@apache.org wrote: Hi, We solved 8 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=17431 There are still lots of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Wagon 2.0

2011-09-27 Thread Tamás Cservenák
+1 On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hello, I'd like to release Apache Maven Wagon 2.0. We fixed 31 issues: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=17379styleName=TextprojectId=10335Create=Create Staging repo :

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Wagon 2.0

2011-09-27 Thread Tony Chemit
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:56:23 +0200 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: +1 (non binding) Thanks, Tony. Hello, I'd like to release Apache Maven Wagon 2.0. We fixed 31 issues: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=17379styleName=TextprojectId=10335Create=Create Staging

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.10

2011-09-27 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 2011/9/27 Paul Gier pg...@apache.org: Hi, We solved 8 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=17431 There are still lots of issues left in JIRA:

Re: Use of standards in the Maven core

2011-09-27 Thread Jesse Glick
Reposting to an old thread, since I am still running into what seems to be Maven 2 debris in the APIs. On 11/19/2010 02:19 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: if it hurts you, make a patch; documentation upgrade, javadoc or code changes The difficulty with submitting Javadoc changes is that if you

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.10

2011-09-27 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1 Emmanuel On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Paul Gier pg...@apache.org wrote: Hi, We solved 8 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=17431 There are still lots of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Wagon 2.0

2011-09-27 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1 Emmanuel On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hello, I'd like to release Apache Maven Wagon 2.0. We fixed 31 issues: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=17379styleName=TextprojectId=10335Create=Create Staging repo :

Maven release plugin not honoring -Darguments

2011-09-27 Thread David Blevins
Is it a known issue that the release plugin does not honor the -Darguments? Specifically, I'm attempting to: mvn release:prepare -DdryRun=true -Darguments=-DskipTests=true -DfailIfNoTests=false It takes 40 minutes to get through a dryRun with tests on. We still have several kinks in the

Change version of a Dependency

2011-09-27 Thread uranodi
I need change version of a dependency but I can`t find a way to not depend on the Dependency`s oldVersion. I have: dependencyManagement dependencies ... dependency groupIdcom.legi.info/groupId artifactIdMRKartifactId

Re: Use of standards in the Maven core

2011-09-27 Thread Mark H. Wood
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 07:49:37AM -0400, Jesse Glick wrote: On 11/19/2010 02:19 PM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: if it hurts you, make a patch; documentation upgrade, javadoc or code changes The difficulty with submitting Javadoc changes is that if you need the Javadoc you probably are not

problem to build maven 3 project from hudson console

2011-09-27 Thread Amiragl
Hi community, I'm using : apache-maven-3.0.3 , hudson-2.1.1 but i'm having this error during building my project Démarré par l'utilisateur anonymous Updating file:///C:/SVNRepository/mavenhudsonproject revision: 27 sept. 2011 14:14:49 depth:infinity ignoreExternals: false At revision 6 Found

Re: are multi-threaded builds still working reliably?

2011-09-27 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
There is also http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4996 , which might be one of the problems you have. Unfortunately I have not been able to reproduce this on any medium-sized or small project that I have available, it only seems to happen on the really large ones. (The reason for this probably

Re: Use of standards in the Maven core

2011-09-27 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I am wondering about what kind of documentation you are thinking about. We have so much documentation that I hardly know where to stop. I think blind javadoc is just so much baloney. If there are any specific use cases that require documentation I'm happy to discuss that. Kristian ti.,

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.10

2011-09-27 Thread Paul Gier
I noticed some possible problems in the staged site docs. The maven failsafe plugin no longer generates a site, and the shadefire JUnit 3 provider also doesn't have a site. Looks like the site configuration was removed from the failsafe plugin [1], and the parent relationship was changed for

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.10

2011-09-27 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
shadefire should not have a site, it's an entirely private artifact in the surefire build, basically a shaded previous version of surefire to run the tests for surefire itself. Stephen did the site work and I'm sure he can tell us what's up ;) Kristian ti., 27.09.2011 kl. 09.12 -0500, skrev

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.10

2011-09-27 Thread Stephen Connolly
Hmmm the site was being generated for 2.9... Paul, What version of maven did you stage the docs with? -Stephen On 27 September 2011 15:24, Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote: shadefire should not have a site, it's an entirely private artifact in the surefire build,

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.10

2011-09-27 Thread Stephen Connolly
You should have see something like this when runing mvn site [INFO] [INFO] Building Maven Surefire Plugin 2.11-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] *[INFO] ---

Re: problem to build maven 3 project from hudson console

2011-09-27 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 27 Sep 2011, at 14:39, Amiragl amy...@live.fr wrote: Hi community, I'm using : apache-maven-3.0.3 , hudson-2.1.1 but i'm having this error during building my project Looks like http://issues.hudson-ci.org/browse/HUDSON-9004 This will be fixed in 2.1.2 (expected soon) otherwise you could

RE: problem to build maven 3 project from hudson console

2011-09-27 Thread Amiragl
Thank you for the responce , I'll try 2.1.0 until the release of 2.1.2 on 30 september :) it's soon Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:51:35 -0700 From: ml-node+s40175n4845847...@n5.nabble.com To: amy...@live.fr Subject: Re: problem to build maven 3 project from hudson console On 27 Sep

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.10

2011-09-27 Thread Paul Gier
The only problem is that a link for Shadefire still shows up as one of the modules of surefire. For now, should I just hack the HTML to remove this link? http://maven.apache.org/surefire-2.10/ On 09/27/2011 09:24 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: shadefire should not have a site, it's an entirely

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.10

2011-09-27 Thread Paul Gier
I ran mvn site:site instead of following the directions like I was supposed to ;) The failsafe plugin staging URL now looks good (pending sync). http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-failsafe-plugin-2.10/ On 09/27/2011 09:36 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: You should have see something like this

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Wagon 2.0

2011-09-27 Thread Robert Scholte
+1 -Robert Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:13:02 +0200 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Wagon 2.0 From: emmanuel.veni...@gmail.com To: dev@maven.apache.org +1 Emmanuel On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hello, I'd like to release Apache

Re: Maven release plugin not honoring -Darguments

2011-09-27 Thread David Jencks
IIRC you have to include your forked maven arguments in the release plugin configuration under arguments-DskipTests=true -DfailIfNoTests=false/arguments Perhaps someone else can say _why_ the m-r-p is set up so you can't set this on the command line? thanks david jencks On Sep 27, 2011, at

Re: Maven release plugin not honoring -Darguments

2011-09-27 Thread Stephen Connolly
you can if you understand shell escaping. - Stephen --- Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the screen On 27 Sep 2011 17:58, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote: IIRC you have to

RE: MASSEMBLY-561: Encoding issue with assembly filtering

2011-09-27 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi, I've checked out the sources and ran all tests first. On my machine the IT for massemble-196 is failing. So I first have to figure out what's going on here before I can continue on your issue. Maybe someone else could pick it up in the meantime. -Robert Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Wagon 2.0

2011-09-27 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 Hervé Le lundi 26 septembre 2011, Olivier Lamy a écrit : Hello, I'd like to release Apache Maven Wagon 2.0. We fixed 31 issues: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=17379styleName=T extprojectId=10335Create=Create Staging repo :

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.10

2011-09-27 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 Hervé Le mardi 27 septembre 2011, Paul Gier a écrit : Hi, We solved 8 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=17 431 There are still lots of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truemode=hidejq

Re: Maven release plugin not honoring -Darguments

2011-09-27 Thread David Blevins
That's not it, the quoting was fine. Even with a single argument with no spaces to -Darguments it still does not work. Did some more digging and it seems the issue is in the apache-10 parent pom. If you alter it like so, the arguments are passed as expected: plugin