Re: Maven deploy does not respect finalName

2014-09-26 Thread VicBi
Hi, Thanks for responding, I saw that I could use the plugin assembly. I'll try to do it with this plugin :). Thanks and regards -- View this message in context: http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Maven-deploy-does-not-respect-finalName-tp5806549p5806658.html Sent from the Maven Developers

Re: Maven deploy does not respect finalName

2014-09-26 Thread John Casey
This question belongs on the users list. Setting that aside, finalName is only meant as a convenience for use during the build process, and as such it only affects the filenames local to the build. You're better off if you regard the repositories (local and remote) as databases (or

Re: VOTE: Release Apache Maven Changes Plugin Version 2.11 take 1

2014-09-26 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, I need some binding votes :-) Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On Sep 24, 2014 3:23 PM, Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@apache.org wrote: Hi, we solved 9 issues: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11212version=20323 * [MCHANGES-343] Update

Re: [VOTE] ASF parent pom version 15, take 2

2014-09-26 Thread Robert Scholte
Is this sha1 correct? I'm getting 2D648556AE7B91828C2ECA36378E81F6DE7373FD which is the same as the content of https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheapache-1002/org/apache/apache/15/apache-15-source-release.zip.sha1 thanks, Robert Op Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:30:00 +0200

Re: [VOTE] ASF parent pom version 15, take 2

2014-09-26 Thread Benson Margulies
I apparently pasted the wrong sum. apache-15-source-release.zip in my local build gets 2D648556AE7B91828C2ECA36378E81F6DE7373FD for me, matching Robert. On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote: Is this sha1 correct? I'm getting

Re: [VOTE] ASF parent pom version 15, take 2

2014-09-26 Thread Robert Scholte
in that case, +1 thanks, Robert Op Fri, 26 Sep 2014 19:06:34 +0200 schreef Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com: I apparently pasted the wrong sum. apache-15-source-release.zip in my local build gets 2D648556AE7B91828C2ECA36378E81F6DE7373FD for me, matching Robert. On Fri, Sep 26, 2014

Re: VOTE: Release Apache Maven Changes Plugin Version 2.11 take 1

2014-09-26 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Mirko, I'll verify this release as well. There's still time, the vote ends after Saturday 15:23 CEST regards, Robert Op Fri, 26 Sep 2014 17:47:41 +0200 schreef Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.com: Hello, I need some binding votes :-) Regards Mirko

How to deploy to a stock WebDAV enabled Apache httpd without modifying Maven installation ?

2014-09-26 Thread Christian Schulte
Subject says it all. Deployment fails PUTting to non-existent directories with HTTP 409. Is it correct that deploying to a WebDAV enabled Apache httpd can only be done by updating the local Maven installation adding support for WebDAV like $ ls -lah lib/ext/ total 1492 drwxr-xr-x 2 schulte

Re: Setting the floor at 3.0.5

2014-09-26 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Benson, This is not what I can recall. What I do remember, but maybe that was a different discussion, is that plugins depending on M2 classes should either be rewritten or have to include the compat dependency themself. Karl-Heinz is doing a great job for pushing the maven prerequisite

Re: VOTE: Release Apache Maven Changes Plugin Version 2.11 take 1

2014-09-26 Thread Robert Scholte
+1 thanks, Robert Op Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:23:12 +0200 schreef Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@apache.org: Hi, we solved 9 issues: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11212version=20323 * [MCHANGES-343] Update maven-reporting-impl to 2.3 * [MCHANGES-342] Removed

Re: svn commit: r1627863 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-javadoc-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/javadoc/AbstractJavadocMojo.java

2014-09-26 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Michael, I'm missing action on the wise words from Hervé. Are you planning to add an IT? thanks, Robert Op Fri, 26 Sep 2014 21:14:37 +0200 schreef micha...@apache.org: Author: michaelo Date: Fri Sep 26 19:14:36 2014 New Revision: 1627863 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1627863 Log:

Re: svn commit: r1627863 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-javadoc-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/javadoc/AbstractJavadocMojo.java

2014-09-26 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2014-09-26 um 21:28 schrieb Robert Scholte: Hi Michael, I'm missing action on the wise words from Hervé. Are you planning to add an IT? Actually, yes. Concerning populateCompileArtifactMap, I guess it suffices to create a sample project with some dependencies and have javadoc link to

Re: svn commit: r1627863 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-javadoc-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/javadoc/AbstractJavadocMojo.java

2014-09-26 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2014-09-26 um 21:28 schrieb Robert Scholte: Hi Michael, I'm missing action on the wise words from Hervé. Are you planning to add an IT? I am already on it. Op Fri, 26 Sep 2014 21:14:37 +0200 schreef micha...@apache.org: Author: michaelo Date: Fri Sep 26 19:14:36 2014 New Revision:

The mess that is symlinks....

2014-09-26 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I now have fully working implementations of zip/tar with symlink support. Unfortunately there is a slight mess in current symlink support that needs to be sorted out. Prior to java7, we were only able to (unreliably) detect that a directory was a symlink. Detecting symlink files was impossible.

Re: The mess that is symlinks....

2014-09-26 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
@Test public void followSymlinks(){ DirectoryScanner ds = new DirectoryScanner(); ds.setBasedir( new File(src/test/resources/symlinks/src/) ); ds.setFollowSymlinks( false ); ds.scan(); ListString included = Arrays.asList( ds.getIncludedFiles() );

Re: svn commit: r1627863 - /maven/plugins/trunk/maven-javadoc-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/javadoc/AbstractJavadocMojo.java

2014-09-26 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2014-09-26 um 21:28 schrieb Robert Scholte: Hi Michael, I'm missing action on the wise words from Hervé. Are you planning to add an IT? I have created an IT based off a real project I host on sourceforge. It replicates MJAVADOC-407. If that is fine, I'd like to roll 2.10.1 on Saturday.

Re: Setting the floor at 3.0.5

2014-09-26 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi Benson, On 9/26/14 3:19 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: Months ago, we had a discussion which, I believe, reached a consensus to up the floor for components and plugins to 3.0.5. I would like to see a real evidence of that...if there is one than i would be ok with it otherwise we need to make