Re: Release maven anton plugin...sorry

Sorry for the offtopic, but you probably got attention of a lot of Antons with that subject :) вс, 5 апр. 2020 г. в 20:16, Elliotte Rusty Harold : > Are there up to date instructions for releasing a Maven plugin > somewhere? If so, I could probably do this. I see >

Re: Second MNG-6296: New option -Dstyle.color is not working

I was actually going to ask on the list eventually. Tried using it with -B to no success a few days ago. I've also had no luck finding where this option is documented on the maven site. The only place to look was in the Jira and PR, but those mostly have the syntax that's not actually what was

Re: Redesign website

What happened to the last attempt and the shotgun owl? :-D On Fri, 21 Jul 2017, 18:22 Robert Scholte, wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to start an attempt to redesign our website. > At ApacheCon Europe Hervé and I got in touch with Open Source Design[1]. > Any objections to

Re: index out of bounds 3.5 regression

You're hitting an issue [1] in plexus-utils most probably. Check if you have processing instructions in one of the poms. [1] https://github.com/codehaus-plexus/plexus-utils/issues/22 2017-06-30 16:57 GMT+03:00 Brian Fox : > I'm getting index out of bounds exceptions with

Re: Maven 3.5.1 - MNG-6025

+1 Needed this for a performance fix in m2e. 2017-05-03 15:05 GMT+03:00 Igor Fedorenko : > +1 > > In the longer run I think we need to review the many caches we have in > Maven (including the resolver) and come up with a coherent strategy how > to manage those caches. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0-alpha-1

Hi guys, I've been reminded of another issue that was supposed to go into 3.4.0 at the time but seem to have forgotten about it when the 3.4-3.5 scrubbing thing happened. It's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6025 Really minor thing that doesn't affect maven itself, but could help a lot

Re: [IT MNG-5958 - Take 2]: Please review integration test for MNG-5958

1cdd0c2be545200a11d74c1055dcd0b16d96adc3> > >> > >> Regards, > >> > > > > To clarify: It won't be possible to run the non-updated (tagged?) core > > ITs against Maven >= 3.5.0. This is what made us reset the branches. You > > need to review this, if you are going to run the non-updated ITs against > > what will be voted for release. > > > > @Anton Tanasenko: > > If what I just wrote is incorrect, please comment here. Thank you. > > > > Regards, > > > > Merged to master. > > -- Regards, Anton.

Re: [IT MNG-5958 - Take 2]: Please review integration test for MNG-5958

New ITs should run successfully against 3.3.9 and 3.5.0-SNAPSHOT+changes. It doesn't make sense to test a feature which is not in. 2017-01-19 22:46 GMT+02:00 Christian Schulte : > Am 01/19/17 um 13:06 schrieb Stephen Connolly: > > Ideal would be to create a *new throw-away

Re: [IT MNG-5958]: Please review integration test for MNG-5958

I've submitted the PR for MNG-5958 branch. Changed the existing 5805 IT to work for 3.3.9 only ('phases' syntax), and duplicated it to a one that works with 3.3.9+ ('lifecyclePhases' syntax). 2017-01-11 22:59 GMT+02:00 Christian Schulte <c...@schulte.it>: > Am 01/11/17 um 15:05 schr

Re: [IT MNG-5958]: Please review integration test for MNG-5958

I'll submit a PR in these couple of days, if it waits a little bit. 2017-01-11 0:54 GMT+02:00 Christian Schulte <c...@schulte.it>: > Am 01/10/17 um 09:30 schrieb Anton Tanasenko: > > 3.3.9 (in 5805) introduced an additional syntax for specifying lifecycle > > goals as >

Re: [IT MNG-5958]: Please review integration test for MNG-5958

licate the test (second one being _mk2 or > something like that) and ensure that the duplicate has a different range > activation > > HTH > > On 10 January 2017 at 07:32, Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So 5805 should be marked as only

Re: [IT MNG-5958]: Please review integration test for MNG-5958

1d9> > > > > authorStuart McCulloch <mccu...@gmail.com> > > Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:23:06 +0100 (11:23 +) > > > > Commit to the ITs: > > <https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven- > integration-testing.git;a=commit;h=8852538208e

Re: [DISCUSS] Big Scrub for proposed 3.5.0 (if we reset master)

FIX-3.5.0: MNG- WONTFIX Add a ProjectArtifactsCache similar to PluginArtifactsCache That's actually a https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6025 2017-01-01 2:55 GMT+02:00 Michael Osipov : > I just went through the list my issues. Here is a safe list I

Re: Massive number of failing ITs

Looks like the high failure count was due to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6023 The commit that reverted the slf4j version change came in some 9 hours ago while we were running tests just before that. https://github.com/apache/maven/commit/4b35102f0e3302e15a80d3ddb756463601b9217a

Re: Read plugin configuration from another plugin

Hey, M2E is effectively doing LifecycleExecutor#calculateExecutionPlan(session, false, "default").getMojoExecutions(), and each returned mojo execution has a final xml config. 2016-04-28 13:00 GMT+03:00 Tamás Cservenák : > Hi there, > > there is a POC I was toying with

Re: Get licenses of transitive dependencies

Hi, MavenProject#getArtifacts() is returning a resolved list of all dependencies, each artifact will have only one specific version. Which scope is resolved - depends on the requiresDependencyResolution attribute of your @Mojo. Be aware, that not all of the projects provide licensing infromation

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

Tried out with a couple of projects that contributed to burning two of the previous release attempts plus a couple more. All good! +1 2015-10-29 23:37 GMT+02:00 jieryn : > Tested with a few projects, I see no issues with this release. Thank you, > +1 non-binding. > On Oct 29,

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.6

think will help. I’ll cut the release next Monday. On Aug 2, 2015, at 5:46 PM, Anton Tanasenko atg.sleepl...@gmail.com wrote: Sure thing, I'll update pull request. Thanks for reminding. 2015-08-02 21:00 GMT+03:00 Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org: Even though the changes seem

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.6

:37 +0200 schreef Anton Tanasenko atg.sleepl...@gmail.com: I've created yet another PR for MNG-5805: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/62 Sorry guys, I was certain I had run m-enforcer-p its as well with 3.3.5 candidate. 2015-08-01 16:57 GMT+03:00 Anton Tanasenko atg.sleepl...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.6

Oh not again, The LifecyclePhase#toString() method was added by me along with toLegacyMap. Looks like I didn't take care of 'mojos' field possibly being null. This seems to be happening when an extension specifies a lifecycle phase but doesn't assign any mojo executions to it. 2015-08-01 16:08

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.6

I've created yet another PR for MNG-5805: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/62 Sorry guys, I was certain I had run m-enforcer-p its as well with 3.3.5 candidate. 2015-08-01 16:57 GMT+03:00 Anton Tanasenko atg.sleepl...@gmail.com: Oh not again, The LifecyclePhase#toString() method was added

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.5

Hi Jörg, The error message you posted says that java is unable to allocate 500mb of heap. The machine you were running it on didn't have that much available at the time. 2015-07-23 15:47 GMT+03:00 Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@swisspost.com: Hi folks, M335 needs even more memory (see also

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.4

This looks to be a consequence of MNG -5805 :( 2015-07-19 23:12 GMT+03:00 Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.com: This seems to affect project which use requirePluginVersions as an enforcer-rule. After inserting this rule into another project I get a similar stack trace.

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.4

I've renamed getter methods in question from xPhases to xLifecyclePhases and reimplemented the original ones to preserve full compatibility. Setters were left mostly as is since imo those are not called from outside of maven core. Pull request is submitted for

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.4

://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ (http://osrc.dfm.io/mfriedenhagen) https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Anton Tanasenko atg.sleepl...@gmail.com wrote: This looks to be a consequence of MNG -5805 :( 2015-07-19 23:12 GMT

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.4

+1 for MNG-5805, works perfectly. 2015-07-18 15:33 GMT+03:00 Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io: +1 Analyzing release validity... stagingUrl: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1199 groupId: org.apache.maven artifactId: apache-maven version: 3.3.4 Source ZIP url

Custom packaging types: configuring DefaultLifecycleMapping mojo executions

Hi, There is no possibility right now to map goals to phases with a custom configuration and/or dependencies when dealing with custom packagin types. DefaultLifecycleMapping only has 'goals' parameter in components.xml, and DefaultLifecyclePluginAnalyzer does not take those into account. I