Am 2017-06-03 um 13:53 schrieb Tibor Digana:
Hi Michael,
I have pushed branch SUREFIRE-1380_2, see [1], and separated the previous
ticket SUREFIRE-1380 to two: SUREFIRE-1380 and SUREFIRE-1381.
The branch SUREFIRE-1380_2 is for Jira SUREFIRE-1380.
[1]:
I've ran successfully the ITs on FreeBSD under JDK 7 and 8, so +1 from me.
Would it make sense to add an IT for SUREFIRE-1376?
Guillaume
Le 03/06/2017 à 13:53, Tibor Digana a écrit :
Hi Michael,
I have pushed branch SUREFIRE-1380_2, see [1], and separated the previous
ticket SUREFIRE-1380
Hi Michael,
I have pushed branch SUREFIRE-1380_2, see [1], and separated the previous
ticket SUREFIRE-1380 to two: SUREFIRE-1380 and SUREFIRE-1381.
The branch SUREFIRE-1380_2 is for Jira SUREFIRE-1380.
[1]:
Am 2017-06-03 um 12:36 schrieb Tibor Digana:
Michael, I will split SUREFIRE-1380 in two tickets on tomorrow evening.
Another flush is necessary because the method InputStream.read() is called
in a loop and the flush should be called after last byte. If another thread
marks the stream to be
Looks good now.
Am 2017-06-03 um 12:31 schrieb Tibor Digana:
The changes in SUREFIRE-1376 are done.
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2017-06-03 um 10:56 schrieb Tibor Digana:
I have added a new branch with small change only, SUREFIRE-1380.
Michael, I will split SUREFIRE-1380 in two tickets on tomorrow evening.
Another flush is necessary because the method InputStream.read() is called
in a loop and the flush should be called after last byte. If another thread
marks the stream to be closed asynchronously, then the bytes can be lost.
The changes in SUREFIRE-1376 are done.
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Michael Osipov wrote:
> Am 2017-06-03 um 10:56 schrieb Tibor Digana:
>
>> I have added a new branch with small change only, SUREFIRE-1380.
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven-surefire.git
Am 2017-06-03 um 10:56 schrieb Tibor Digana:
I have added a new branch with small change only, SUREFIRE-1380.
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven-surefire.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/SUREFIRE-1380
I am not happy with this: you mix two different taks in one issue,
refactoring and
Am 2017-06-03 um 09:03 schrieb Tibor Digana:
Hi all,
We have a patch received from users group. I have improved it a bit, added
Javadoc and pushed the code to branch [1].
Jira issue related [2].
[1]:
I have added a new branch with small change only, SUREFIRE-1380.
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven-surefire.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/SUREFIRE-1380
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Tibor Digana wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We have a patch received from users
Hi all,
We have a patch received from users group. I have improved it a bit, added
Javadoc and pushed the code to branch [1].
Jira issue related [2].
[1]:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven-surefire.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/SUREFIRE-1376
[2]:
11 matches
Mail list logo